MAED 5351 Whole Numbers, Rational Numbers, and Operations
7 Pages1892 Words338 Views
Added on 2020-04-07
MAED 5351 Whole Numbers, Rational Numbers, and Operations
Added on 2020-04-07
ShareRelated Documents
MAED 5351 Whole Numbers, Rational Numbers,and OperationsSubmit Assignment by 11:59 PM, Sunday of Week 4.Student:Date:Grade Level/Subject Area:Overview: Original Cognitively Demanding TasksIn this module you read about the research done by Schulman as well as Smith, Stein, andcolleagues regarding the selection of worthwhile tasks that are cognitively demanding for students. In this assignment, you will create/modify one cognitively demanding Number and Operations task and provide justifications for your selection. (In the state of Texas, with the revised TEKS, teachers were encouraged to create Amplified Tasks, modifying tasks to increase the cognitive demand. Samples of such tasks are available on the links below. They are not necessarily focused on Number and Operations, but keep in mind thatis a requirement for this assignment.)http://jukebox.esc13.net/teks_revised_m2/HTML_materials/teks_68_02_07_task_6-8.pdf(6th-8th grade)http://jukebox.esc13.net/teks_revised_m2/HTML_materials/teks_k2_02_07_task_k-2.pdf(K-2 examples)Source: Texas Education Agency. (2013). Amplifying Mathematical Tasks, 6-8. Retrieved from Introduction to the Revised Mathematics TEKS: Mathematical Process Standards: http://jukebox.esc13.net/teks_revised_m2/HTML_materials/teks_68_02_07_task_6-8.pdfTexas Education Agency. (2013). Amplifying Mathematical Tasks, K-2. Retrieved from Introduction to the Revised Mathematics TEKS: Mathematical Process Standards: http://jukebox.esc13.net/teks_revised_m2/HTML_materials/teks_k2_02_07_task_k-2.pdfObjectivesDevelop one Number and Operations tasks that is cognitively demanding (or “amplified”)Classify the cognitive demand of the tasks, providing a rationale©2017 University of Texas at ArlingtonPage 1 of 7Module 4: Collaboration on an Original Cognitively DemandingTask
MAED 5351 Whole Numbers, Rational Numbers,and OperationsInstructionsCreate one task that is cognitively demanding or amplify an existing task and do the following:Give your task a titleState the appropriate grade for task, based on a standards document (i.e., National Councilof Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM] standards, Texas College and Career Readiness Standards [CCRS], Common Core State Standards [CCSS], your state’s standards) Include the exact text from the standard you used to make this decision and indicate which standards you used Description of the mathematics involved to solve the task (include full solutions)Classification on Cognitively Demanding framework (either “procedures with connections” or “doing mathematics”) and rationale based on readings and discussion Provide feedback on the collaboration processReflect on the critical mathematics©2017 University of Texas at ArlingtonPage 2 of 7
MAED 5351 Whole Numbers, Rational Numbers,and OperationsRubric Use this rubric to guide your work on the Module 4 assignment. TasksTargetAcceptableUnacceptableOn time(max 7 points)On Time(7 points)Late(0 pointsBasic Information (max 10 points)Clearly state the task along with its title. Indicate appropriate grade and standard used to make this decision(10 points)State the task and indicate appropriate grade or appropriate standard used to makethis decision(6-9 points)Task not stated or not clearly stated. No appropriate grade given and/or no text from standard specified and/or no standard referenced (NCTM, CCRS, CCSS, etc.)(0-3 points)Mathematics Involved(max 10 points)Clear description of mathematics involved (full solutions included)(10 points)Description of mathematics involved in solution is not clear(6-9 points)No description of mathematics involved in solution(0-3 points)Cognitive Demand Classification(max 10 points)Classification of tasks as higher level of cognitive demand (“procedures with connections” or “doing mathematics”) along with rationale(5 points)Classification of higherlevel cognitive tasks is missing a rationale(3-4 points)No classification of task(0-1 point)Rationale for classification is based on readings; citation(s)included(5 points)Rationale is included, but not based on readings and/or not cited (3-4 points)No rationale for classification (0-1 point)Reflection on Process(max 15 points)Thoughtful response about process of selecting a task collaboratively with colleagues(5 points)Somewhat thoughtful response about process of selecting a task collaboratively with colleagues(2 points)No response about process of selecting a task collaboratively with colleagues(0-1 point)Rationale for task is Rationale is included, No rationale for ©2017 University of Texas at ArlingtonPage 3 of 7
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.