This article discusses the worldwide concern of MAiD or medical assistance in dying. It explores the legality of MAiD, its benefits for patients suffering from incurable pain and diseases, and the ethical considerations involved. The author shares personal opinions and perspectives on the topic.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running Head: MAiD 0 MAiD student
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
MAiD 1 Part one Euthanasia is the worldwide concern as it has been a debatable topic for many years (Keown, 2018). MAiD or medical assistance in dying is actually the medical act which is commenced by single individual with aim of putting a person to expiry or death either painlessly or failing to prevent the death form usual causes in the scenario of disease of incurable coma (Li, Watt, Escaf, Gardam, Heesters, O’Leary, & Rodin, 2017). It is legal in some countries and illegal in others. According to me MAiD is beneficial and it is like a mercy for the patient who is suffering from an unalterable pain and diseases, but I also think that the decisions should not be taken until the situation is getting worse. The patients and their families should discuss about the situation. My opinion about this particular topic is not one sided. I think the medical assistance in dying is acceptable in some condition but I think it also prevents every chances of future treatment of that particularly person. As everybody knows that medical science is developing day by day and the scientist are continuously working on discovering new treatment options for different diseases, but medical assistance in dying or euthanasia prevents every chances of cure (Kastenbaum, 2015). The program started by UHN is in favour of patients as it relieves them from pain and their family members who are not free from the distress they experience due the patient’s condition (Goldberg, Nissim, An, & Hales, 2019). On 6 February 2015 Supreme Court of Canada also removes the ban on the MAiD for the diseased person meeting with particular eligibility needs (Fujioka, Mirza, McDonald, & Klinger, 2018). I would be comfortable in the programs like MAiD at UHN. However, I would also refuse if the patient’s condition is curable. If you ask me to put myself in this situation and delivering this assistance, my answer would be yes. As i can think that there are lots of people who are suffering from pain which cannot be cured, it is hard to have such pain for lifetime. If I
MAiD 2 would be in such situation as I will say as it can also help my family who would be suffering with me. However I would not ask for such assistance if I know that my condition is treatable but not at the place I am getting treated. I am not in favour of euthanasia or MAiD in case of Coma until it is unalterable. Although this decision is quite difficult for anyone who has to decide whether they wants to live and suffer, or they wants to quit. Nobody can imagine the things going on in patient’s mind (Li, et al., 2017). If I would be in such situation I want to know the method for euthanasia or MAiD they will use, I would ask the professional if they searched for every possibility of cure or not, will my family get the money from my medical insurance. I would also ask the professional about who will be involved in MAiD, and whether they have the authority or not to perform MAiD. Part two This post was quite convincible and I am agreed with the thoughts and comments of the author. I think he mentioned all the personal and professional reasons to avoid and accept the MAiD very well. I am also in favour of the Supreme Court’s decisions to implement right to die in Canada as it can relive the person from incurable pain and unalterable diseases. However I am not fully convinced with the emotional reason to avoid MAiD, according to me, as health professional you need to be strong and take decision without any emotional impacts if it is in favour of the patient. The health professional should know that their first priority is to provide the best interventions to the patient, in the diseases that cannot be cured or altered, MAiD is the best approach. I am agree with the author’s comments on the legal issues a health professional may face while providing MAiD, but being conscious and aware about the ethical and illegal aspects a health professional can avoid the issues. The health providers should asks for consent form from family and the patient before applying the MAiD. Author also expressed his thought
MAiD 3 about being in a situation of patient very well, and i am fully convinced and agreed with the comments he made. He also reported that people of MAiD providers are left vulnerable, both legally and emotional. I think the points he made are applicable and right in some cases. They need to change this in favour of the patients and their families and also for themselves. I am very convinced with the comment that the social workers who are involved in the process of MAiD should be careful while directing the patients seeking assistance in dying, as it is actually a crime to suggest or counsel someone for dying by suicide. I think he clearly suggested that the decisions of MAiD should be taken by the patients completely; the health professional or social workers should only advise them if they ask for it (Kastenbaum, 2015). The example provided by the author is also appropriate to express the necessity of MAiD in the adverse situations. There are number of people who are in favour of the medical assisted death and some are against this Approach (Kastenbaum, 2015). Author also mentioned about what he would do if he have to make the decision to apply for MAiD. I think he expressed his side very clearly and I am agreed with the comments. Having an understanding about the diagnosis and prognosis is essential before receiving MAiD. He also reported that he would get the information about the people with same health issues are in more progressed situation. And I am very convinced with it. Prolong the death until the suffering of the person become intolerable is the good ideas of the timeline as it increases the chances of being cured. This is because the scientists inventing different treatments, and medicines that can be helpful in the patient’s condition. In the end I am agreed with the author.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
MAiD 4 References Fujioka, J. K., Mirza, R. M., McDonald, P. L., & Klinger, C. A. (2018). Implementation of Medical Assistance in Dying: A Scoping Review of Health Care Providers' Perspectives.Journal of pain and symptom management,55(6), 1564-1576. Goldberg, R., Nissim, R., An, E., & Hales, S. (2019). Impact of medical assistance in dying (MAiD) on family caregivers.BMJ supportive & palliative care, bmjspcare-2018. Kastenbaum, R. (2015).Death, Society and Human Experience (1-download). Routledge. Keown, J. (2018).Euthanasia, ethics and public policy: an argument against legalisation. Cambridge University Press. Li, M., Watt, S., Escaf, M., Gardam, M., Heesters, A., O’Leary, G., & Rodin, G. (2017). Medical assistance in dying — Implementing a hospital-based program in Canada. New England Journal of Medicine, 376(21), 2082-2088.