Management Accounting- Questions and Answers

This article provides answers to five questions related to management accounting, including traditional and activity-based costing systems, overhead costs, and more. The article explains the differences between traditional and activity-based costing systems, the concept of overhead costs, and how to manage over or under absorbed overheads. It also discusses the advantages and limitations of activity-based costing systems.

Management Accounting- Questions
and Answers
1 | P a g e

Table of Contents
Answer to Question No. 1...........................................................................................................................3
Answer to question No.2.............................................................................................................................3
Answer to Question no. 3............................................................................................................................5
Answer to Question No. 4...........................................................................................................................7
Answer to Question No. 5...........................................................................................................................8
References:................................................................................................................................................11
2 | P a g e

Answer to Question No. 1
Sewing Easy Ltd
Traditional Costing System
Particulars Basic Model Advanced Model
Units Produced and sold 1600 1500
Direct Cost unit cost Total cost unit cost Total cost
Direct Material Cost
$
325.00
$
520,000.00
$
560.00
$
840,000.00
Direct Labor Cost
$
150.00
$
240,000.00
$
260.00
$
145,600.00
Overhead Costs
Allocated:
Inspection cost
$
6.00
$
10,323.00
$
6.00
$
9,677.00
Assembly Cost
$
29.00
$
46,452.00
$
29.00
$
43,548.00
Production Scheduling
$
34.00
$
54,194.00
$
34.00
$
50,806.00
Machine Setup
$
11.00
$
18,065.00
$
11.00
$
16,935.00
Total Cost
$
556.00
$
889,034.00
$
738.00
$
1,106,566.00
Working:
Allocation of overhead
cost Basic Model Advanced Model
Inspection cost
$
20,000.00
$
10,323.00
$
9,677.00
Assembly Cost
$
90,000.00
$
46,452.00
$
43,548.00
Production Scheduling
$
105,000.00
$
54,194.00
$
50,806.00
Machine Setup
$
35,000.00
$
18,065.00
$
16,935.00
Answer to question No.2
Sewing Easy Ltd
Activity Based Costing System
WORKING
Activity Basic Model Advanced model total
3 | P a g e

setting up machine 100 250 350
Inspection cost 200 750 950
Assembly Cost
Machine hour 4600 3400 8000
Production
Scheduling Runs 50 500 550
Pre determined Overhead Rate
estimated
overhead cost
estimated cost
driver activity
Predetermined
overhead rate
setting up machine $ 35,000.00 350 100
Inspection cost $ 20,000.00 950 21.05
Assembly Cost
Machine hour $ 90,000.00 8000 11.25
Production
Scheduling Runs $ 105,000.00 550 190.91
Allocation of
overhead costs basic model advanced model
setting up machine $ 10,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 35,000.00
Inspection cost $ 4,211.00 $ 15,789.00 $ 20,000.00
Assembly Cost
Machine hour $ 51,750.00 $ 38,250.00 $ 90,000.00
Production
Scheduling Runs $ 9,545.00 $ 95,455.00 $ 105,000.00
Calculation of Product costing under Activity based costing system
Particulars Basic Model Advanced Model
Units Produced and
sold 1600 1500
Direct Cost unit cost Total cost unit cost Total cost
Direct Material Cost $ 325.00 $ 520,000.00 $ 560.00
$
840,000.00
Direct Labor Cost $ 150.00 $ 240,000.00 $ 260.00
$
145,600.00
$ 760,000.00
Overhead Costs
Allocated:
Inspection cost $ 3.00 $ 4,211.00 $ 11.00
$
15,789.00
Assembly Cost $ 32.00 $ 51,750.00 $ 26.00
$
38,250.00
Production
Scheduling $ 6.00 $ 9,545.00 $ 64.00
$
95,455.00
Machine Setup $ 6.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 17.00
$
25,000.00
Total Cost $ 997.00 $ 1,595,506.00 $ 773.00 $
1,160,094.0
4 | P a g e

0
Answer to Question no. 3
Profit and Loss Account- sewing Easy Ltd
Advanced Model
Traditional Costing system Activity based Costing System
Particulars
product
cost Profit Amount Amount
product
cost Profit Amount' Amount'
Revenue
$
1,106,5
66.00
$
221,313.
20
$
1,327,87
9.20
$
1,160,0
94.00
$
232,01
8.80
$
1,392,11
2.80
Less cost of
goods sold
$
840,000.
00
$
840,000.
00
Less: Direct
Labor Cost
$
145,600.
00
$
145,600.
00
Less Production
overhead cost
$
120,966.
00
$
174,494.
00
$
1,106,56
6.00
$
1,160,09
4.00
Gross Profit
$
221,313.
20
$
232,018.
80
Less
Operational
Expenses:
Selling and
Administration
$
140,000.
00
$
140,000.
00
Interest
Expense
$
25,200.0
0
$
25,200.0
0
Office rent
$
35,900.0
0
$
35,900.0
0
Total Expenses
$
201,100.
00
$
201,100.
00
Net Profit
$
20,213.2
0
$
30,918.8
0
5 | P a g e

The company has introduced advanced model for their customers in order to grab intended domestic and
overseas market. It is the customer, who can drive the production pattern of the company through their
product choice. There are several factors like Porter’s Five Forces and PESTEL analysis. But the basic
factor is costing of the product. Although the company exercises traditional costing system for their
product costing method, recently they are going to start activity based costing system for more accurate
product costing of their products. The company has two different products- basic model and advanced
model of sewing machines. While implementing activity based costing method, the product costing of both
the products are going to differ with more realistic implication of costing method. Traditional costing
method had resulted $ 556 for basic model and $ 738 for advanced model. This system is confined to
straight method of overhead cost allocation to the cost of product. The total overhead cost is allocated to
the products as per straight line method of per unit basis. The application of activity based costing system
had shown totally different result. This system is inclined to more scientific allocation of overhead costs to
the units for product costing purpose. The basis of activity based costing is to allocate overhead costs in
more realistic and scientific way to make the costing approach logical for the products of the company
through identification of production activities and derivation of cost drivers. Advanced model of sewing
machines are more attractive to the overseas customers due to its added value of service to the users.
Upgraded customer base of overseas is more interested to buy those units of sewing machines. When
the company is going to implement activity based costing system to their product costing method, the
costing of basic models are inferred as $ 997, and the advanced model are concluded as $ 773. This is
due to more scientific allocation of overhead costs depending upon the treatment of cost driver and
activities related to two different products. While considering the cost driver factors in costing system, the
allocation of overhead costs are determined by activities related to production system with its contribution
to the manufacturing process. Basic steps in activity based costing system endorse identification of
activities with subsequent classification of those activities as per the hierarchical status of costs.
Hierarchical status of cost is such framework, which clarifies respective activities in order to connect them
with the product in different levels of activities. The levels considered are unit level, product level, batch
level and facility level. Unit level activities are those activities which are to be performed on each different
unit of products. Batch level activities are such activities which are performed during the time of
6 | P a g e

production of a single batch. Product level activities are those activities, which are identified to be carried
out on separate note for each output. The types of facility level activities are those activities, which are
taken care of at the plant level. The most easily identifiable activities are unit level activities while facility
level activates are really tough to be traced. (Schmitz, 2012)
With the above discussion, it is easily identifiable that Sewing easy Ltd is more concentrated on product
level activities. The implementation of activity based costing system is easily allocated to this production
method and the identification of cost driver is easy to be identified for overhead cost allocation. For this
purpose, the advanced model product with activity based costing proves to be economic with the required
level of service from those sewing machines, as asked for by the overseas customers. (Explained, 2017)
Answer to Question No. 4
Overhead normally relates to indirect nature of manufacturing costs in accounting. There are other
expenses or costs take part in manufacturing process other than direct material and direct labor costs.
Actual overhead is referred as those indirect manufacturing costs which normally occurs and recorded in
the books of accounts. These segments of actual overhead costs include different provisions like water,
gas, electricity, production supervisors, property tax, repair and maintenance, depreciation and several
other head of costs.
Applied costs are those indirect manufacturing costs, which are assigned to the products manufactured.
In this context, application, assignment and allocation of manufacturing overheads are exercised by
assessment of predetermined periodical overhead rate. Example for this concept is an estimation of $
3,000,000 as manufacturing costs with the total machine hour as 60,000. The resultant predetermined
annual overhead rate is arrived at $50 per machine hour.
When historical costing system is followed on the basis of actual costs, the derivation of recovery rate is
instrumental to match actual and applied overhead through the system of predetermined recovery rate.
This situation prevents occurrence of over or under applied costs. (Focus, 2017)
7 | P a g e

The situation of over or under applied costs arises for these two instances:
a) The cost of actual overhead exceeds or is lesser than the estimated overhead;
b) The base of actual absorption amount under different heads differs from the basis of estimated
absorption.
This situation of over or under absorbed overheads can be managed in three ways:
1) The amount may be carried forward to next financial period accounting;
2) The amount may be written off through exercise of costing profit and loss account;
3) A supplementary rate of absorption may be worked out with subsequent application to the
manufacturing process. (Net, 2014)
These above three steps can be useful to manage over or under absorbed overheads for any
organization with logical foundation.
Answer to Question No. 5
Activity based costing is defined as an approach to the aspect of costing through monitoring of different
manufacturing activities. This system is involved in tracing of resource consumption followed by making
costing analysis of final product. In this process, resources are allocated to different manufacturing
activities followed by activities to the objects of cost. Main deriving agent for this practice is determination
of cost drivers related to activities and attach those activity costs to the products. (CGMA, 2013)
Activity based Costing was first introduced by Kaplan and Bruns in 1980. It is reckoned as the latest
alternative concept of absorption costing, which allows the managers for better understanding of product
costing and net profitability of customers. This system can make the business more equipped with better
level of information flow to ensure value added proposition to enble for more effective level of decisions.
Basic difference between Activity based costing system and traditional costing system is that ABC is
8 | P a g e

based on identification of driver based activities while traditional costing system is depending upon flat
system of cost allocation to the output. (efinancemanagement, 2017)
Activity based Costing is a method of 2 steps of costing. Through this method, allocations of costs are first
made to the activities identified for any business followed by the assignment of products or services
through those activities. Alternatively, the ABC system endorses the concept of costing of products or
services on the specific activities required to produce or render products or services.
There are certain advantages and limitations of this ABC system. They are defined below:
Advantages:
 More perfect system of costing with accuracy related to allied products or services, to suffice the
value justification to stakeholders in the forms of customers, supply chain associates and referred
SKUs.
 For better understanding of respective overheads
 Easy for everyone to understand the concept
 Scientific approach to consider unit cost instead of total cost
 Prone to integration with latest management tools like six sigma and other development programs
 Ability to visualize waste and other activities which are not able to add value
 Support management of performance derivation with different parameter like Balance Score card
 Confirms ability of costing to processes, value chain and supply chain ingredients
 This system of costing enables projecting the path of work done
 Confirms facilitation of benchmarking
Limitations of Activity based Costing System
Although the concept of Activity based Costing system proves to be helpful and conclusive for the
managers to ensure management of overhead to make clear concept of understanding profitability of
products and respective stakeholders, and proves to be stronger tools for managerial decision making;
this system has certain limitations too, which are given below:
9 | P a g e

Limitations:
 Transformation of costing system from traditional to activity based costing system is a major
project. This transformation need to be implemented through introduction of massive IT enabled
infrastructure. Properly qualified IT professionals are required for this purpose, who are able to
handle big data and mange them as per the requirement of the organization. This process
involves big amount of financial impact for the organization, too.
 Activity based costing system generates numerical figures like product margins. These figures
are produced in odd numerology as compared to the output of traditional costing system. As the
managers are more conversant with traditional system to perform their management duties, and
that is the parameter of their performance evaluation, ABC system is not the ideal option for this
performance evaluation in initial stage.
 Understanding activity based costing output in the form of data is not easy for new users and it is
often tending towards misinterpretation. Hence referred output data must be handled with proper
knowledge base and true care to arrive at the decisive managerial decision making. Assignment
of costs to products or services along with its impact on customers and other objects of cost are
mainly relevant with potential ability. It is the preamble of using activity based costing data for the
managers to identify those costs which proves relevance for the decision to be made.
 The reports generated from the Activity based costing system do not ascertain the concept of
Generally Accepted Accounting Principle or GAAP. Subsequently, the organization with Activity
based costing system should follow two types of costing system- first to use internally and second
to prepare external reports. (Explanation, 2017)
10 | P a g e

References:
CGMA, 2013. Activity Based Costing(ABC). [Online] Available at:
https://www.cgma.org/resources/tools/essential-tools/activity-based-costing.html [Accessed 22 May
2018].
efinancemanagement, 2017. Activity Based Costing. [Online] Available at:
https://efinancemanagement.com/costing-terms/activity-based-costing [Accessed 22 May 2018].
Explained, A., 2017. Activity Bassed Costing. [Online] Available at:
https://accountingexplained.com/managerial/cost-systems/activity-based-costing [Accessed 22 May
2018].
Explanation, A., 2017. Advantages, Disadvantages and Limitations of Activity Based Costing (ABC)
System. [Online] Available at:
http://www.accountingexplanation.com/advantages_disadvantages_and_limitations_of_activity_based_co
sting.htm [Accessed 22 May 2018].
Focus, A.i., 2017. Appled Overhead versus Actual overhead. [Online] Available at:
http://accountinginfocus.com/managerial-accounting-2/overhead-allocation/applied-overhead-versus-
actual-overhead/ [Accessed 22 May 2018].
Net, T.o., 2014. Treatment Of Over Or Under Absortion Of Overhead. [Online] Available at:
http://www.tutorsonnet.com/over-or-under-absorption-of-overhead-homework-help.php [Accessed 22 May
2018].
Schmitz, A., 2012. Accounting for Managers.

11 | P a g e