Investment Appraisal Techniques and Approaches to Pricing - Management Accounting
Verified
Added on 2023/04/23
|14
|2866
|216
AI Summary
This report discusses various investment appraisal techniques and approaches to pricing in management accounting. It includes calculation of NPV and IRR, comparison of capital budgeting decisions, methods of investment appraisals, and approaches to pricing.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1 MAIN BODY...................................................................................................................................1 A) Calculation of Net present value.......................................................................................1 B) Calculation of IRR.............................................................................................................1 C) Limitation of various techniques of proposed investments...............................................1 D) Comparison of two approaches to making capital budgeting decisions by means of discounted cash flow..............................................................................................................2 E) Another two methods of investment appraisals.................................................................2 F) Can non-monetary aspects are useful to make various decisions related to the investment projects...................................................................................................................................3 G) Four methods used in investment appraisals are...............................................................3 H) Various approaches to pricing...........................................................................................4 CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................5 REFERENCES................................................................................................................................6 APPENDIX......................................................................................................................................7
INTRODUCTION Management accounting is the process of preparing various financial accounts and reports in order to analyze the accurate and timely based financial and statistics data which are required bymanagers to make day-to-day decisions in order to achieve the short term and long term objectives of the company. Investment appraisal is a collection of various techniques that are used to identify the attractiveness of investment. In this report, case study of KingtonTech Ltd. has being used in order to calculate the NPV and IRR. In this report, two approaches are compared to make various capital budgeting decisions. In this, methods of investment appraisals are also discussed. MAIN BODY A) Calculation of Net present value [Enclosed in appendix] B) Calculation of IRR [Enclosed in appendix] C) Limitation of various techniques of proposed investments The acceptability of proposed investment is that NPV is positive, thus it can be suggested as a proposed investment in financial terms. In the above calculation, IRR is 16% and discounted rate of return is only 12% which indicate that IRR is more as compared to discounted rate that is used. Thus, proposed investment can be financially accepted (Carmichael, 2011). It can be said that cash flow of the proposed investment in terms of Alpha is inevitable as there is only one IRR.Therefore, limitation of investment in Alpha is that evaluation of IRR and NPV is highly reliant on the production and sales volume. Thus, Kingston Tech Ltd. should analyze and investigate the assumption that is underlying the production and sales volume. Thus one of the main limitations of NPV is that it requires an estimated cost of capital in order to calculate Net present Value and at the same time, cash flows should be in terms of dollars not in the term of percentage. Likewise, the method of IRR cannot be used in a situation in which sign of the cash flows of a project changes continuously. 1
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
D) Comparison of two approaches to making capital budgeting decisions by means of discounted cash flow The two approaches to make capital budgeting decisions by the means of discounted cash flow are NPV and IRR. Company should make an efforts to select/accept the investment proposal that gives positive NPV as it can increase the market value of company to the great extent as per the increment in NPV. In order to increase the wealth of shareholders, companies should always make effects to investment in the proposal which gives the positive NPV (Garleanu and Pedersen, 2011). At the same time, in order to increase the wealth of shareholders, Kingston Tech Ltd. can also accept the projects that have profitability IRR. The condition of profitability IRR arises when IRR is higher than the uniform discounted rate. Technique of IRR is used for making various necessary decisions for the management. NPV at 20%-£92,387 NPV at 12%£91,154 IRR15.9716% By taking into consideration, it could be concluded that Kingston Tech Ltd. should move on with the NPV at 12% because it is given positive cash flow which in turn will aid company to increase the shareholder’s wealth. At the same time, IRR at 16% should be selected in order to achieve the profitability IRR. E) Another two methods of investment appraisals Another two methods of investment appraisals which management accountant can use are payback period method and Accounting rate of return. Pay Back Period Methodis the method of analyzing the time period after that investment made will be recovered back (Irani, 2010). This method will provide the manager of Kingston Tech Ltd. an indication that how many year will take place in order to recover the original investment cost. This method makes an allowance for the risk by focusing attention on the near future term. The advantage of this method is that it helps to identify the project which is having fastest return on investment made. This method is especially beneficial for the newly opened firm in order to know the actual time frame for recovering the amount invested. However, drawback of this method is that it does not consider the time value of money which in turn could lead to wrong decision making. Furthermore, it ignores cash flows that occur after the payback 2
period which indicates that there is the possibility of ignoring the complete return which a project can generate. Likewise, on the other handAverage Rate of Returnis the percentage of average accounting profit that is earned over the average accounting value of investment earned (Kaplan and Atkinson, 2015). This method normally focuses on the accounting profit generated than that of cash flows. The approach of this method is to estimate revenues that will be generated by a proposed investment and then, deducting all the projected operating expenses that are associated with the project. Advantage of this method is that it uses the entire streams of net operating income which in turn assists investors and creditors to evaluate the performance of business. Moreover, there is also a drawback of this method. This method ignores the time value of money which is a major decision factor which aids company in taking various financial decisions F) Can non-monetary aspects are useful to make various decisions related to the investment projects It is true that all monetary aspects are important and beneficial in order to find out the best investment proposal/ project. There is no doubt that these methods aid investors to analyze the time period after which they are able to recover the particular amount of money invested. But, all the time, decisions taken on these basis are not correct (Lukka and Modell, 2010). Meanwhile, it could also be concluded that only by using various monetary aspects for making investment decision is not a right way. Investment decisions should be made by taking into consideration both the monetary and non-monetary aspects.Monetary aspects include various methods of capital budgeting like Payback period, IRR, NPV, ARR and many more. Similarly, non-monetary aspects includes various internal and external factors that are available in the environment. These factors could be identified by conducting SWOT or PESTLE analysis or by using various relevant models. Thus, at last, it suggests that in order to take correct decisions, Kingston Tech Ltd. should undertake both the monetary and non-monetary aspects. This in turn will aid company to properly found the time period after which they are able to recover the invested amount. G) Four methods used in investment appraisals are Out of the four investment appraisal methods, company can use more than one method at a time. These four methods (i.e. NPV, IRR, ARR and Pay Back period) contribute towards the broader understanding of the investment projects. These methods also assist company to rank 3
various investment that can be made according to their optimality and efficiency of return in order to select the best investment proposal. But, at the same time, it cannot be ignored that each of the methods has its own risk factors and different methods are suitable for the different type of business organization. Features of different types of methods are as follow:-Net Present Value: - NPV takes into account the size, risk factor and timing of the future cash flow which in turn aid managers to determine the viability on the cost of capital of the company based on the selected project (Maharjan, Zhang and Gjessing, 2011).Internal Rate of Return: - IRR takes the cash flows of investment projects into account along with the time value of money (Otley, 1999). This method will aid manager to decide and analyze whether the selected investment proposal/ project is profitable from the company’s point of view or it will increase the cost of company. Moreover, this method can be considered as one of the best methods for ranking projects.Pay Back period:- This method reduces the cost of company due to its simplicity. At the same time, this method will aid company to analyze the number of years when it is able to recover the amount of money investment (Willcocks, 2013). Average Rate of Return: - ARR does not take into account the concept of time value of money. This method is used by company in order to calculate the return earned out of the net income generated from the proposed capital investment (Zimmerman and Yahya- Zadeh, 2011). Furthermore, it is analyzed that using more than one method of investment appraisals reduces the risk involved and at the same time, decreases the chance of discrepancy between actual and budgeted revenue. Sum of methods also reduces the cost of project. Henceforth, after analyzing all the four methods of investment appraisals, it could be concluded that NPV is one of the suitable methods for the long term investment. Thus, on the other hand, it could be concluded that Pay Back period is suitable for analyzing the short term investment. H) Various approaches to pricing There are three main approaches which Kingston Tech Ltd. can consider (i.e. competitor based approach, economist approach and cost plus pricing approach). 4
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Competitor based pricing approach: - It is one of the effective pricing methods in which seller considers the price of competitors as a benchmark for setting its own prices. Main advantage of this method is that it helps company to set their prices in a competitive manner (Andor, Mohanty and Toth, 2011). But, on the other hand, drawbacks of the approach cannot be ignored, this is a very time consuming approach and competitors are also able to change its price easily. Cost plus pricing approach: - In this method, markup is applied to the base cost in order to determine the targeted selling price. This method will assist Kingston Tech Ltd. to easily identify the amount of expenditure that is incurred by the company at the time of manufacturing goods. According to me, most suitable pricing method for Kingston Tech Ltd. isthe cost plus pricing approach because this method will reduce the risk as well as uncertainty and at the same time, it assures company to make profit since its cost are reimbursed so it will initially make profit and there is no risk of losses. CONCLUSION From the following report, it could be concluded that Net Present value is one of the best methods for analyzing the long term investment and payback period method will be beneficial for meeting the short term investments. At last, it can also be said that out of the three selected approaches, Cost plus approach is one of the best approaches for the Kingston Tech Ltd. 5
REFERENCES Books and Journals Carmichael,D.G.,2011.Analternativeapproachtocapitalinvestmentappraisal.The Engineering Economist.56(2). pp.123-139. Garleanu, N. and Pedersen, L. H., 2011. Margin-based asset pricing and deviations from the law of one price.Review of Financial Studies, p.hhr027. Irani, Z., 2010. Investment evaluation within project management: an information systems perspective.Journal of the Operational Research Society.61(6). pp.917-928. Kaplan, R. S. and Atkinson, A. A., 2015.Advanced management accounting. PHI Learning. Lukka, K. and Modell, S., 2010. Validation in interpretive management accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society.35(4). pp.462-477. Maharjan, S., Zhang, Y. and Gjessing, S., 2011. Economic approaches for cognitive radio networks: A survey.Wireless Personal Communications.57(1). pp.33-51. Otley, D., 1999. Performance management: a framework for management control systems research.Management accounting research.10(4). pp.363-382. Willcocks,L.,2013.Informationmanagement:theevaluationofinformationsystems investments. Springer. Zimmerman, J. L. and Yahya-Zadeh, M., 2011. Accounting for decision making and control. Issues in Accounting Education.26(1). pp.258-259. Online Andor, G., Mohanty, S.K. and Toth, T., 2011.Capital Budgeting Practices: A Survey of Central andEasternEuropeanFirms.Available through:<http://www.efmaefm.org/0EFMAMEETINGS/EFMA%20ANNUAL %20MEETINGS/2011-Braga/papers/0118.pdf>[Assessed on 30thDecember, 2015]. 6
APPENDIX 1) Sales Revenue workings (W1) Year1234 Selling price per unit with inflation of 4%per year (£)20.8021.6322.5023.40 Production and Sales (units)35,00053,00075,00036,000 Sales Revenue (£)7,28,00011,46,39016,87,5008,42,400 Variable cost (W2) Year1234 Variable cost per unit with inflation of 5% per year (£)12.6013.2313.8914.59 Production and Sales (units)35,00053,00075,00036,000 Total Variable cost (£)4,41,0007,01,19010,41,7505,24,880 Total Investment in working capital (W3) 7
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Year0123 Sales Revenue (£)7,28,00011,46,39016,87,5008,42,400 Investment in working capital (7%)0.070.070.070.07 Total Investment in working capital (£)50,96080,2471,18,12558,968 Year 0 Investment:£50,960 Year 1 Investment:£29,287 Year 2 Investment:£37,878 Year 3 Investment:-£59,157Recovery Year 4 Investment:£58,968Recovery Depreciation workings (W4) Plant cost£10,00,000 Four year life4 Depreciation across 4 years£2,50,000 N ot esYear 0Year 1Year 2Year 3Year 4 ££££ Sales Revenue1 7,28,00 011,46,390 16,87,50 08,42,400 Costs: Variable2(4,41,0(7,01,190)(10,41,(5,24,8 8
cost00)750)80) Total Contribut ion3 2,87,00 04,45,2006,45,7503,17,520 Capital allowanc es (Deprecia tion)4 (2,50,0 00)(2,50,000) (2,50,0 00) (2,50,0 00) Taxable profit537,0001,95,2003,95,75067,520 Taxation (30% per year)6 (11,10 0)(58,560) (1,18,7 25) (20,256 ) After tax profit725,9001,36,640 2,77,02 547,264 Capital allowanc es (Deprecia tion)8 2,50,00 02,50,0002,50,0002,50,000 After-tax cashflow9 2,75,90 03,86,640 5,27,02 5 2,97,26 4 Initial investme nt- Plant cost 1 0 (10,00, 000) Working1(50,96(29,28(37,878)59,15758,968 9