This essay evaluates the reasons causing workplace conflicts and approaches for effective conflict management. It discusses alternative dispute resolution, types of conflict styles, emotional intelligence theory, guanxi, and Ganqing.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head:Management and Leadership Skills Management and Leadership skills
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Management and Leadership Skills2 Introduction The main aim of this essay is to address the reasons causing workplace conflicts and evaluates the approaches for effective conflict management. Reasons causing workplace conflicts According to Currie Gormley Roche & Teague (2017), workplace conflict is held by trade representatives as well as personnel managers. Along with this, some focuses on occasional industrial arguments as liberating that generates bad opinion among workforces as well as management. In an analytical manner, it is stated that grievance and disputes can arise due to market relations such as difference over labor pricing as well as, from the managerial relations like differentiation over application regarding management power. The key reason for causing conflicts is trade unions entering into a collective agreement with the employers. It creates conflicts in assigning the rights and obligation for enterprise and individual employees. In contrast to this, Carmody-Bubb Duncan & Ree (2015) stated that conflict can be seen as challenging factor at the workplace that creates due to lack of trust, closeness where people feel fear to raise their questions as well as concerns about consequences. It can also create the tension along with disruptive behavior at the workplace. On the other side, Yen Abosag Huang & Nguyen (2017) evaluated that emotional conflict is illustrated as the perceived and recognized interpersonal incompatibilities within the group that is relied on personality clashes as well as friction. Emotional conflicts can be demonstrated as harmful as they could be personal and denigrates the relationships as well as emphasizes on non- task associated disagreement among parties. It is specifically destructing the collaboration within a relationship, resulting in a lack of coordination as well as disputes between parties within the liaisons. In contrast to this, task conflicts are perceived and recognized disagreement within the
Management and Leadership Skills3 group regarding the task that should be performed along with emphasizes on judgemental differences regarding the best method for attaining the objectives of a company. Approaches for effective conflict management According to Currie Gormley Roche & Teague (2017), effective conflict management strategy is beneficial for avoiding the conflicts at the workplace. The best way that a company can use is workplace conflict management entails the diffusion of ADR (Alternative dispute resolution in a different manner. In contrast to this, another strategy for a company is updating conflict management practices and procedure by ad hoc and gradually transformation. Another technique is that a line manager should play a stronger role in problem-solving at the workplace. The motivation for using these strategies is to endorse the informal conflict management. The term ADR could be applied to a mode for dealing the conflicts as well as disputes entailing the individual workforces. In the context of disputes and grievances are surrounding the individual employment rights. Moreover, coaching as well as mentoring activity facilitates the opportunity to line manager to address whether workforces are unsatisfied with any concept of a company or whether they are facing the workplace issues. In contrast to this, Carmody-Bubb Duncan & Ree (2015) opined that there are different types of conflicts style that must be used for avoiding the conflicts at the workplace. These conflicting styles are based on the five-factor model. The first style is integrating style that characterized through the open exchange of data and where innovative results to the problem can be achieved. Another conflict style could be an obliging style that is used to make a greater attempt for accommodating the issue related to the other people over one’s own. The dominant style can be also considered as an unreceptive strategy where disagreement can be avoided as well as, no resolution usually considered. Another style is compromising that considered as entailing the
Management and Leadership Skills4 give and take in which, both parties can provide something for making the mutually satisfactory decision. The concept of Goleman emotional intelligence theory is an effective technique for appealing the people using leadership theory, specifically transformational leadership theory. Since, this theory focuses on the ethical and personal relationship between followers and leaders. The five personality factors can be major subscales for emotional intelligence. These personality factors are Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Openness, Neuroticism, and Agreeableness, as well as emotional intelligence factors, are General Mood, Stress Management, Interpersonal, Intrapersonal, and Adaptability. Emotional intelligence can be determined by EQi, NEO-FFI is used to determine the personality as well as Watson-Glaser is used for assessing general intelligence. On the other side, Yen Abosag Huang & Nguyen (2017) evaluated that guanxi can be used to reduce the conflict within the business association without identifying the conflicts. In addition, Guanxi is an integral element for business conduct and maintaining a personal relationship in Chinese society. Guanxi is developed at a more interpersonal level between specific actors and individuals that demonstrate the company. This aspect is different from the perspective of western relational governance that involves cooperation as well as, trust developed amongst two companies. It is also stated that written as感感in Chinese, Ganqing could be an integration related to two Chinese characters. The first term is defined as feeling of an individual as a verb as well as, second is related with sentiment, emotions as well as affections. Along with this, Ganqing demonstrates the tenor of social association among two individuals and two companies along with an emotional connection that is existed between members of the system. Moreover,
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Management and Leadership Skills5 business length association restrained the anticipated set related to association between GRX to task conflict as well as, increases the emotional attachment with business length association, declining the impact of GRX on emotional and conflicts intasks. Conclusion From the above interpretation, it can be concluded that there are different reason causing the conflict. These are market relations, trade unions entering into a collective agreement, lack of trust, and Emotional conflicts. It can be summarised that there are several approaches to manage the conflict such as alternative dispute resolution principle, types of conflicts style such as integrating style, obliging style, dominant style and compromising and five personality factors, and Goleman emotional intelligence theory. Other approaches are guanxi and Ganqing.
Management and Leadership Skills6 References Carmody-Bubb, M.A., Duncan, P.A., & Ree, M.J. (2015). Emotional intelligence and personality predict conflict management style: examining relationships and factor structures. Journal of Behavioral Studies in Business, Vol. 8, 1-12. Yen, D.A., Abosag, I., Huang, Y. A., & Nguyen, B. (2017). Guanxi GRX (ganqing, renqing, xinren) and conflict management in Sino-US business relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 66, 103–114. Currie, D., Gormley, T., Roche, B., & Teague, P. (2017). The management of workplace conflict: contrasting pathways in the HRM literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 19, 492–509, DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.12107.