1 MANAGEMENT Corruption is one of the potential issues in the management at the national and international level. According to the economists, indicators of corruption lie in the GDP per capita, government expenditure and the foreign assistance(Anand, Rajagoplan and Guerber 2016).The immediate outcome of corruption are delay in the economic development, international trade and investment. These issues adversely affect the economic growth of a country. According to the research, it has been reflected that the high corruption directly affects the foreign direct investment, simultaneously affecting the economic success of the country. As a result of this, both the private and the public spheres encounter lack of confidence towards executing the activities in an efficient and effective manner. Globalization has assisted the managers to predict the rates of corruption.However, López‐Duarte et al. (2016)opines thatthe difficulties still persist in the efforts towards corruption. This is in terms of the multi-faceted nature of societies and the phenomenon, which govern the social structure. Cultural norms and values contradict the aspect of corruption. However, disobedience to the cultural norms and indulgence in the corruption activities degrade the pride of the country.Aligning it with the workplace context, if the managers indulge in these activities, it is a shameful act, if the reputation of the country is considered.In this context, Nam (2018) states that the dimension ofindulgence vs restraint can be applied. The mindset of the managers changes according to the workplace scenario. The new manager, who has visited Tanzania for communicating with the locals regarding establishment of the dam and plant, needs to be ethical in his approach.On the contrary, Beugelsdijk et al. (2015) is of the view that if he uses theuncertainty avoidance indexis used by the new manager, it would be productive in terms ofaverting the illegal instances. If he is conscious towards adopting the elements of the ethical code of conduct, then he would be able to exert the provided power and authority as per the requirements.
2 MANAGEMENT Conducting participative leadership style reflects the incorporation of collective approach towards executing the tasks. Gender equity relates to the dimension of masculinity vs. femininity, diversifying the workforce. Liberal approach towards the needs of the employees adds to the dimension of indulgence (Kong and Volkema 2016).This relates with the dimension ofindividualism vs collectivism, as proposed by Hofestede. Along with this, it can also be collaborated with the dimension of power distance. Lanier and Kirchner (2018) argues that measuring the effectiveness and feasibility of the exposed performance would reflect the use ofpower distance index.
3 MANAGEMENT Bibliography Anand, V., Rajagoplan, A. and Guerber, A., 2016. The influence of national culture on the rationalizationof corruption. InCrime and Corruption in Organizations(pp. 163-180). Routledge. Beugelsdijk, S., Maseland,R. and Van Hoorn, A., 2015. Are Scoreson Hofstede's Dimensions of National Culture Stable over Time? A Cohort Analysis. Global Strategy Journal, 5(3), pp.223-240. Kong, D.T. and Volkema, R., 2016. Cultural endorsement of broad leadership prototypes and wealth as predictors of corruption. Social Indicators Research, 127(1), pp.139-152. Lanier, C. and Kirchner, M., 2018. Corruption and Culture: Empirical Analyses of Long- Term Indulgence and Corrupt Systems. Review of Business, 38(2). López‐Duarte, C., Vidal‐Suárez, M. M., & González‐Díaz, B. (2016). International business and national culture: a literature review and research agenda.International Journal of Management Reviews,18(4), 397-416. Nam, T., 2018. Examining the anti-corruption effect of e-government and the moderating effect of national culture: A cross-country study. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), pp.273-282.