This report focuses on the implementation of lean project management principles in an organization, specifically SINTEF Ltd. It discusses various leadership styles, the preferred leadership style for SINTEF, the characteristics of the project team, and tools for facilitating lean business operations.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: MANAGEMENT OF LEAN PROJECT Management of Lean Project Name of the student: Name of the university: Author Note:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1MANAGEMENT OF LEAN PROJECT Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction..........................................................................................................................2 2.0 Various Leadership Styles....................................................................................................2 3.0 Preferred Leadership Style and its Approach to SINTEF....................................................4 4.0 Characteristics of “THE A TEAM”.....................................................................................5 5.0 Tools and techniques for facilitating lean business operations............................................6 6.0 Assumptions for the implementation of tools within the organization................................8 7.0 Conclusion............................................................................................................................9 8.0 References..........................................................................................................................10
2MANAGEMENT OF LEAN PROJECT 1.0 Introduction The aspect of this report is to focus on the implementation of the principles regarding Lean Project Management within an organization, which is mainly associated with the consulting of the project (Biazzo, Panizzolo & de Crescenzo, 2016). In this report the implementation of the lean project management is carried out in a functional organization that is SINTEF Ltd. This organization is said to possess different departments such as information technology, finance and engineering. Moreover, the organization also possess the departments of sales and marketing, procurement, production, human capital management and ware housing. This organization is thriving to implement the lean principle within their organization that can lead the organization with potential benefits as well as success. The method for the implementation of lean principles agile methodology is chiefly used. The agile methodology is said to be associated with the IT domain but it can be well identified that the management team of the organization is thriving forward to implement the principlesofleanprojectmanagementwithinthevariousdepartmentspresentinthe organization. For this reason, the senior management team focuses on the different styles of leadership so that they can provide a proper guidance to this lead this implementation. The management team of the organization is seeking to develop a team that will be named as “THE A TEAM”, the prime focus of this team is to put focus on every single step of the implementation, and the team will comprise of 3 to 4 project managers (Huxley, 2015). In perspective of this above situation at SINTEF, the various aspects such as leadership styles, the details about the “A TEAM” as well as the proposed team efficiency systems. 2.0 Various Leadership Styles The distinctive approach of a project to leap from an average towards superior performance of business regarding the leadership styles. The great leaders can be very effective regarding the inspiration as well as ignition of the potential of the employees to thrive the organizational success. The implementation of the lean project principles must adhere leadership styles for the effective implementation as well as execution of the overall project within the environment of the organization of SINTEF. In accordance to the choosing of the great leaders that can thrive the potential success of the organization, the management team must focus on some factors that are likely to be trust, communication, respect, vision as well as integrity (Tortorella, Miorando & Marodin, 2017). The effective leader adheres the broad perspectives of leadership styles at the instant time it is being needed. Thus in case of
3MANAGEMENT OF LEAN PROJECT SINTEF the leadership styles that can be adhered by the management team are stated as follows: Visionary Leadership Style: The chief aspect of this leadership style states that the leaders present within this category provides or enhances the organization with long-term vision as well as direction.Thismotivatesthe employeesto get going for the success of the organization. The utilization of this style can help the project manager for developing and articulating the clarity in the vision of the organization (Sunder, 2016). This style is not neededfortheisolationpurposewhereasitsolicitsthevisionperspectivesofthe organization. The usage of this style must not be taken into consideration if the project manager adapting this style is not associated with the development of the project team. Affiliative Leadership Style: The prime aspect of this style of leadership is to develop harmony among the employees that tends to connect the individuals with each other. The concern of this style is to promote the positive trends of communication as well as development of the team. This style emphasises on diminishing the conflict among the team members for the better working as well as motivating them through the stress times (Mirdad & Eseonu, 2015). The project manager adapting this style provides improved communication as well as repair the broken trust among the employees thus leading to strengthening of the connections. Coaching Leadership Style: This style is depicted as one of the prime leadership styles that deals with the long-term development of the professional regarding the employees present in the project teams. This style identifies the unique strengths as well as weaknesses thus encouraging them for the establishment of the organization’s success goals (Cardon & Bribiescas, 2015). The potential breakdown of this leadership style depends on the strong capabilities of the project manager for the execution of the goals as set by the organization. The project manager must be genuinely concerned about the growth of the team members thus developing trust within the project manager so that the employees could trust them as an established leader. Participative Leadership Style: The primary aspect of this type of leadership style is to develop the commitment goals as well as generate new ideas among the project teams. This leadership style tends to put an emphasis on the employee’s input thus gaining commitment via participation (Minh, 2015). The main or focus points of this style is to enhance the collaboration as well as building the teamwork for better success of the project. This also put
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4MANAGEMENT OF LEAN PROJECT an effective focus on the management of the conflict as well as influence on the project teams that are associated for attaining the specific goals of the organization. Pace Setting Leadership Style: This leadership style accomplishes the task to maintain the higher standard of excellence regarding the project services as well as tasks. This is said to be the style that drives the project utilization for performing the things better as well as faster (Elbert,2018).Thisalsodepictsthepoorperformerswithintheorganizationthus emphasizing them regarding the demands of the situation and perform better. 3.0 Preferred Leadership Style and its Approach to SINTEF TheorganizationofSINTEFdealswiththefinance,engineering,information technology, sales, marketing as well as procurement and warehousing departments. However, the organization is now thriving forward to implement the Lean Project Principles within their workplace environment for the enhancement of the business operations. Thus, the senior management team believes to implement a dedicated and efficient project manager for leading the execution of the Lean Project Principles (Ansah, Sorooshian & Mustafa, 2016). In this scenario the best preferred leadership style of the project manager that must be adhered by the project management team of the organization of SINTEF is stated as theCoaching Leadership Style. The Coaching Leadership style is depicted as one of the most innovative as well as guided leadership style. The project manager that adapts this style of leadership does not solely takes the decisions in accordance to the project management but enhances the employees or the project team members for effective execution of the project (Urban, 2015). The primary character that is needed in a project manager that is adhering the coaching leadership style is the coaching skills. These skills incorporates the development as well as improvementoftheperformanceoftheemployeesinclusiveoftheteammember’s competencies. This style is based on the dynamic communication or interaction among the project leader as well as of the team members associated with the project. The coaching attitude enables a leader for assuring the fact that his employees or project team members can work independently thus not restricting their interest from the project. In case of SINTEF, this style is appropriate, as the initiative of imposing the lean project principles is very new in regards to the organization. Hence, if the project manager guides the team members the implementation can be effective as well enhanced in terms of the organization (Campos & Vazquez-Brust, 2016). Moreover, the independent working
5MANAGEMENT OF LEAN PROJECT assurance of the project team members can enhance the support as well as involvement of the members to work effectively. However, the leader is also capable of understanding the employees better as the leader is closer than the employees rather than the high-level management. Thus, it can be depicted that this leadership style will be a very important approach towards the enactment of the lean principles within the organization of SINTEF. 4.0 Characteristics of “THE A TEAM” In the above section, the preferred leadership style for the implementation of the Lean principles at the organization of SINTEF is stated as Coaching Leadership Style. This style states that project manager is not the sole person that takes decision but the participants as well as project team members also participates in decision-making procedure as well as executes the overall planning for the implementation of the lean principles within the organizational structure of SINTEF. The stated project team of SINTEF is named as “THE A TEAM” and this mainly consists of a project manager and three to four project team members. The coordination of the team members is always appreciated for the enhancement as well as effective implementation of lean principles in the environment of SINTEF. The chief identified characteristics in a project team member for becoming valuable among the other project team members within the team, regarding the implementation of the lean principles within SINTEF is stated as follows: The understanding capability of the role of a particular individual team member is one of the most significant valuable character regarding the team member (Lozano et al., 2018). The team members are associated with the lean principle implementation and the most effective evaluation of this capability may be identified potentially within the project team member who has a brief but effective knowledge of the lean principles and its application. The next effective character may be said as the embracement of the collaboration of the team members with the project of lean principle implementation within the organization of SINTEF. The collaborative response of an individual team member with respect to the project manager may enhance the value of a project team member. This tends to provide effective values to the project implementation. The third as well as the significant characteristics that are needed within an individual for enhancement of the values of a project team member is that the commitment of the individual towards its team. In case of SINTEF, the overall aim of the team is
6MANAGEMENT OF LEAN PROJECT depicted as the implementation of lean principles within various aspects of the organization.If a particular team member is effectively committed towards the goal of SINTEF along with the project manager then it will be depicted as one of the important value regarding “THE A TEAM”. The last characteristics that might put a strong value in an individual project member is said to be the development of skills for the growth of a team member. This provides an added advantage to the overall project execution procedure so that the thus making a team member to be valuable for the effectiveness of the overall implementation procedure. Thus from the stated points it can be well explained that the adherence of the above points can make it possible for an individual team member within “THE A TEAM” to be valuable in terms of the implementation of the lean project principles within the scenario of the SINTEF. 5.0 Tools and techniques for facilitating lean business operations Seven tools and techniques can be considered by the project management team of SINTEF for the implementation of the lean principles for the improvisation of business within their organization. These are explained as follows: 5S Tool: This is depicted as the simple as well as powerful tool for ensuring the production as well as manufacturing of the goods and services in an effective manner throughput the organization. This assures the organization to be efficient and safe for the execution of any type of process within the environment of the organization. The brief description of the %S are provided in the table below: SortFirst StepIncludes the sorting of all the important and useful items from the mess present within the workplace. StraightenSecond StepIncludes the arrangement of the useful items efficiently as well as ensures the proper organization of the data. SweepThird StepIncludes the cleaning of the work area and ensures the machineries are still effective after the occurrence of any technical difficulties. StandardizeFourth StepInvolves the simple standards that depicts the working as a team. This is a crucial phase. SustainFifth StepThis adheres the standards of the promised organizational goals. Cellular manufacturing: This concept deals with the manufacturing increment of the various products with minimal waste. This depends on the arrangement of components in an effective
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7MANAGEMENT OF LEAN PROJECT manner that can lead to higher advantages with the proper implementation (Eaidgah et al., 2016). This address the multiple prospects of a customer regarding the different products as provided by SINTEF. Continuousimprovement:Thisissaidtobeaprocedureoftheleanprinciple implementation,whichcomprisesoftheoverallformalpracticesaswellaseffective guidelines and rules. This tool is influenced by the need of the continuous development in the set of products that are being delivered to the customer by organizations (Tauriainen et al., 2016). This process further follows a four step methodology for carrying out the execution procedure. These are stated as follows: PlanThe change is planned and identified before the implementation has already started. DoThe change is executed for the implementation after the plan is completed as well as verified. CheckThe data collected for checking the effectiveness of the implementation regarding its success ActThe change is depicted successful the plan is carried out accordingly and then assessments are carried out. Jidoka:ThisJapanesetermdepicts“automationwithrespecttohumanintervention” (Omogbai & Salonitis, 2017). This tool performs the following four processes for the detection of the vulnerabilities in the main system for which the implementation is needed. Deviation detection regarding the normal happening workflow of the organization. The halts in the production. The operational manager checks the issues as well as resolves the potential problems. The changes encompasses the standard workflow. Total maintenance of product: The downtime of machine is said to be a serious concern regarding the development of the products and are said to cause some detrimental issues due to the problems (Yadav et al., 2017). This program consists of three components that are stated below:
8MANAGEMENT OF LEAN PROJECT PreventiveMaintenance:RegularlyPlannedaswellaseffectiveactivitiesof maintenance and these are not conducted by the employees whereas it is conducted by the project managers associated with this maintenance section (Mendes, 2018). Corrective Maintenance: This includes the decision-making procedure regarding the equipment that needs fix or are to be newly equipped. The machines should be examined frequently for sensing this type of situations. Maintenance prevention: This stage ensures that the machines, which are purchased, are the correct ones. If the proper machineries are not adhered then the employees will feel difficult to maintain them. Total Management of Quality: This is said to be a continuous quality check of the overall lean principles that are implied on the organization (Buzatu, Costache & Iordache, 2019). This management deals with the participative management and thus focuses on the customer demands as well as needs which further aligns the production and timeline processes. KANBAN: This is a tool that is endorsed by the power of visualization using the overall picture of the work that is being performed by the organization. The big ideas that this tool provides are: Process Visualization Process of limited work Focus on the process flow Improvement that is to be done continuously Thus, it can be said that the managementof individuals, teamsaswell as wide organizational work are assessed critically for the implementation of the lean principles within the organization. 6.0 Assumptions for the implementation of tools within the organization The probable tools that can be implemented for imposing lean principles within the organization of SINTEF are explained below The 5S tool can be adhered by the organization in the department of engineering, sales, marketing, warehousing as well as procurement as this departments incorporates the production of the services, and machineries are involved for the carrying out the execution procedure (Tyagi et al., 2015). Thus, this tool might be significant for achieving the organizational goals.
9MANAGEMENT OF LEAN PROJECT The next tool that can be used by SINTEF is assumed as the KANBAN tool. This tool enhances the visualization power of the overall flow of the business processes that are followed by the organization. This will effectively put a positive impact in the overall project flow within the organization of SINTEF. One of the most significant technique that can be used by SINTEF is the continuous improvement technique regarding the implementation of the lean principles within the organization(YALÇINTILFARLIOĞLU,2017).Thistoolwillenhancethepossible improvements that need continuous improvement. The analysis of the improvement can be done by this tool and can be well justified for the lean principles. 7.0 Conclusion Thus, the above report clearly depicts that the organization of SINTEF is trying to implement lean principles within their workplace. The necessary agile methodologies are well explained in the above report. The various leadership styles that will be probably helpful for the top management support to choose the effective project manager is well stated in the above report. The management also wants to deploy a special team that is “THE A TEAM”, which tends to impose the lean principles effectively and this team will be composed of a project manager and 3 to 4 effective team members. Thus, it can be concluded that the lean principles will be very effective in the overall environment of the organization to increase the potential of the business execution.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
10MANAGEMENT OF LEAN PROJECT 8.0 References Ansah, R. H., Sorooshian, S., & Mustafa, S. B. (2016). Lean construction: an effective approachforprojectmanagement.ARPNJournalofEngineeringandApplied Sciences,11(3), 1607-1612. Biazzo, S., Panizzolo, R., & de Crescenzo, A. M. (2016). Lean management and product innovation: a critical review. InUnderstanding the Lean Enterprise(pp. 237-260). Springer, Cham. Buzatu,A.I.,Costache,C.,&Iordache,A.(2019).LEANMANAGEMENTFOR SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT.Quality-Access to Success,20. Campos, L. M., & Vazquez-Brust, D. A. (2016). Lean and green synergies in supply chain management.Supply Chain Management: An International Journal,21(5), 627-641. Cardon, N., & Bribiescas, F. (2015). Respect for people: the forgotten principle in lean manufacturing implementation.European Scientific Journal, ESJ,11(13). Eaidgah, Y., Maki, A. A., Kurczewski, K., & Abdekhodaee, A. (2016). Visual management, performancemanagementandcontinuousimprovement:aleanmanufacturing approach.International Journal of Lean Six Sigma,7(2), 187-210. Elbert, M. (2018).Lean production for the small company. Productivity Press. Huxley, C. (2015). Three decades of lean production: Practice, ideology, and resistance. International Journal of Sociology,45(2), 133-151. Lozano, A. G. G., Alulema, J. M., Flores, A. G., Peña, A. S., & Cascante, G. M. (2018). LEAN MANUFACTURING TOOLS FOR PRODUCTIVE IMPROVEMENT IN THE PRODUCTION PROCESS OF SMOKED CHICKENS.Journal of Marketing and HR,8, 440-452. Mendes, M. F. R. (2018).A journey towards Lean: the case of a Small-Medium Enterprise (SME)(Doctoral dissertation). Minh, N. D. (2015). A new application model of lean management in small and medium sized enterprises.
11MANAGEMENT OF LEAN PROJECT Mirdad, W. K., & Eseonu, C. I. (2015). A conceptual map of the lean nomenclature: comparing expertclassificationto the leanliterature.Engineering Management Journal,27(4), 188-202. Omogbai, O., & Salonitis, K. (2017). The implementation of 5S lean tool using system dynamics approach.Procedia CIRP,60, 380-385. Sunder M, V. (2016). Lean Six Sigma project management–a stakeholder management perspective.The TQM Journal,28(1), 132-150. Tauriainen, M., Marttinen, P., Dave, B., & Koskela, L. (2016). The effects of BIM and lean construction on design management practices.Procedia engineering,164, 567-574. Tortorella, G. L., Miorando, R., & Marodin, G. (2017). Lean supply chain management: empirical research on practices, contexts and performance.International Journal of Production Economics,193, 98-112. Tyagi, S., Cai, X., Yang, K., & Chambers, T. (2015). Lean tools and methods to support efficient knowledge creation.International Journal of Information Management, 35(2), 204-214. Urban,W.(2015).Theleanmanagementmaturityself-assessmenttoolbasedon organizational culture diagnosis.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,213, 728- 733. Yadav, O. P., Nepal, B. P., Rahaman, M. M., & Lal, V. (2017). Lean implementation and organizational transformation: A literature review.Engineering Management Journal, 29(1), 2-16. YALÇIN TILFARLIOĞLU, F. (2017). A NEW METHOD IN EDUCATION: LEAN. Electronic Turkish Studies,12(6).