This document discusses the dangers of a flawed mission statement and its impact on the unit's mission statement, individual job descriptions, and goals. It also explores the unique features of organizational development that differentiate it from other change initiatives.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: MANAGEMENT Organizational Behavior Name of the Student: Name of the University: Author Note:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1MANAGEMENT Table of Contents 1. Dangers of Flawed Mission Statement........................................................................................2 2. Impact of the Flawed Statement on Mission Statement of the Unit, Individual Job Description and Goals.........................................................................................................................................2 3.Unique Features of Organizational Development that make it Different from Other Change Initiatives.........................................................................................................................................3 References:......................................................................................................................................5
2MANAGEMENT 1. Dangers of Flawed Mission Statement The mission statement refers to the brief statement that relates to the general principles and values that helps in guiding the department goals and the program curriculum within the organization (David, David & David, 2014). A flawed mission statement refers to the statement that does not provide clear guidance to the actions, the objectives and the purpose of an organization (Jung & Pompper, 2014). The danger of the flawed mission lies in the inability of statement in guiding the organizational actions and in defining the primary objectives and purpose of the organization. In other words, a flawed mission statement does not provide the employees with focus, direction, challenge or meaning. A flawed mission also negatively impacts the goals and the job descriptions. Besides, a flawed mission also fails in setting the tone as well as the philosophical position that helps in the development of objectives and in communication of the overall purpose of the department or the program. A flawed mission will also result in the inability of the program distinction of the similar areas and its clear alignment with the organization’s mission. 2. Impact of the Flawed Statement on Mission Statement of the Unit, Individual Job Description and Goals The elements that a company adopts in shaping the business process include vision statement, mission statement, values, goals and objectives. The vision statement represents the roadmap for future. The mission statement represents the whereabouts of the company. The values represent the fundamental beliefs about the company’s operation while the goals represent defined strategies that company adopts in the attainment of the corporate mission. Whereas, the
3MANAGEMENT objectivesare measureable, specific, action based, timed and realistic strategiesused for attaining the values and goals of the company. Considering the fact that mission represents a roadmap for the company’s future, a flawed mission statement will lead towards a flawed destination because of the following reasons (Page, 2013): It will prevent the company in attaining the objectives It will prevent the company in attaining the goals and the values It could lead to the failure of the company A flawed statement will affect development of mission statement of the unit along with the goals and the job descriptions of the individuals since it causes a shift of the role towards the flawed statement that is different from what the company aims at achieving. This is because in case of a flawed statement guides the principle to corporate process in terms of the roles, objectives and the accountability. 3.Unique Features of Organizational Development that make it Different from Other Change Initiatives The unique features of organizational development include (Jeske & Axtell 2016): A Planned Change: Organizational development focuses on bringing about a planned change Encompass the Entire Organization: Organizational development represents the development of the entire organization for effectively responding to change.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4MANAGEMENT Ensures Long Range Change: Organizational development is a longer term process that might take years or months to get implemented Orientation of Systems: Organizational development emphasizes on relationships amongst group and not the group themselves. Independent Change Agents:Organizational development involves consultant from outside organization who can operate independently and bears no ties to the politics or the organizational hierarchy. Emphasize on Problem Solving: Organizational development focuses on solving problems instead of theoretical discussion Ensures Management at All Levels: Organizational development involves collaborative management at all levels Relies on the Group Process: Organizational development relies on inter group conflicts, group discussions, process of cooperation and confrontations Provides Feedback: This provides a basis to the employees for further activities
5MANAGEMENT References: David, M. E., David, F. R., & David, F. R. (2014). Mission Statement Theory and Practice: A Content Analysis and New Direction.International Journal of Business, Marketing, & Decision Science,7(1). Jeske, D., & Axtell, C. M. (2016). How to run successful e-internships: A case for organizational learning.Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal,30(2), 18-21. Jung, T., & Pompper, D. (2014). Assessing instrumentality of mission statements and social- financial performance links: Corporate social responsibility as context.International Journal of Strategic Communication,8(2), 79-99. Page, T. (2013).Conservation and economic efficiency: an approach to materials policy. RFF Press.