Project Alignment and Performance Scorecard in Management

This presentation discusses project alignment and performance scorecard in management. It covers ethical considerations, budget limits, and recommendations for improvement. The bibliography includes sources on strategic management, risk management, and economic effects of partnerships.

MANAGEMENT

PROJECT A: DEGRANDIS RUNNING
SHOESCommentary on project alignment
Making profit as well as maintaining the
law of the nation need to be made
It is necessary to understand the
budget limit based on which the project
need to be completed
Use of child labor need to be banned so
that ethical work environment can be
maintained
The company code of conduct need to
be abided by so that proper
implementation of techniques be made

CONTD..
Project Performance Scorecard snapshot
Process involved in shoe
manufacturing
Project Process Perspective
Benefit Perspective
Increase in reputation and sales
Stakeholder Perspective
Profitable yet concern about use of
children
Innovative and learning
Perspective
New sole cushioning shoes are
adopted
Quality Perspective
Project process is criticised but
results are profitable
Use Perspective
Understanding the Code of
Conduct

CONTD..
Conclusion and Recommendation
It can be concluded that ethical trust is
needed to be obtained
Recommendations can be made for the
improvement of the future
One recommendation can be the shift of
the manufacturing unit from China to avoid
child labor
Another recommendation is the timely
production of the shoes and appointment of
regional managers
Gain more human resources is another

PROJECT B: AOC PARTNERSHIP
Commentary on project alignment
Require to complete projects within the
given timeframe
It is necessary to maintain the ethical
considerations so that Code of Conduct
regarding work can be upheld
The incident related to bribing have
been taken into consideration as the
ethical factor
The bribing incident have led to the loss
of reputation and partnership deal

CONTD..
Project Performance Scorecard snapshot
Timely completion of the project
Project Process Perspective Benefit Perspective
Increase in reputation and contract
with the AOC
Stakeholder Perspective
Meeting every requirement except
the timeline
Innovative and learning Perspective
Ethics on not taking bribes is
provided
Quality Perspective
Leads to an increase in profit but
loss of partnership due to bribes
Use Perspective
Consequences of bribes and the loss
of partnership

CONTD..
Conclusion and Recommendation
Conclusion can be based on the biggest
concerns of the project
Loss of partnership and reputation can
be considered as problematic for the
project
One of the recommendation can be the
fact that Code of Conduct on bribing need
to be understood
At the same time it is necessary that
employees be increased for meeting
deadline

PROJECT C: LADYBIRD SPORTING APPAREL
Commentary on project alignment
The alignment is based on the loss of
customers and the marketing factors that
may affect the project
Ethical consideration is the
dissatisfaction of the customers
Increase in customer complaint due to
poor marketing can be considered as
factors
Poor sales as well as customer
dissatisfaction can be considered as
ethical considerations

CONTD..
Project Performance Scorecard snapshot
Loss of customers due to improper
market research
Project Process Perspective Benefit Perspective
Increase in reputation and customer
satisfaction
Stakeholder Perspective
Meet customer requirements and
improve sales
Innovative and learning Perspective
Require proper market research
Quality Perspective
Low quality and loss of reputation
as well as profit
Use Perspective
Improve reputation and develop
partnership

CONTD..
Conclusion and Recommendation
It can be concluded that assessment of
market and customer satisfaction can be
made
Recommendations can be made so that
improvement of market research is
undertaken
Assessment of the market condition is
required to be made
The quality of the materials for the
project can be considered for customer
satisfaction

BIBLIOGRAPHY
 Ansoff, H.I., Kipley, D., Lewis, A.O., Helm-Stevens, R. and Ansoff, R., 2018. Implanting strategic
management. Springer.
 Ansoff, H.I., Kipley, D., Lewis, A.O., Helm-Stevens, R. and Ansoff, R., 2018. Implanting strategic
management. Springer.
 Barclay, C. and Barclay, C., 2015. Introduction to the Project Performance Scorecard as a Technique in
Determining Project Success. Strategic Project Management: Contemporary Issues and Strategies for
Developing Economies, pp.293-304.
 Brook, R.K., Cattet, M., Darimont, C.T., Paquet, P.C. and Proulx, G., 2015. Maintaining ethical standards
during conservation crises.
 Browne, S., 2018. Beyond aid: from patronage to partnership. Routledge.
 Carvalho, M.M.D. and Rabechini Junior, R., 2015. Impact of risk management on project performance: the
importance of soft skills. International Journal of Production Research, 53(2), pp.321-340.
 Chadwick, W., 2018. Significant others: creativity & intimate partnership. Thames & Hudson.
 Chen, H.L., 2015. Performance measurement and the prediction of capital project failure. International
Journal of Project Management, 33(6), pp.1393-1404.
 Harriss, D.J. and Atkinson, G., 2015. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2016
update. International journal of sports medicine, 36(14), pp.1121-1124.
 Heikkilä, M., Bouwman, H. and Heikkilä, J., 2018. From strategic goals to business model innovation paths:
an exploratory study. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 25(1), pp.107-128.
 Kaplan, R.S. and Atkinson, A.A., 2015. Advanced management accounting. PHI Learning.
 Laudon, K.C. and Laudon, J.P., 2016. Management information system. Pearson Education
 McCarthy, J., 2016. Partnership, collaborative planning and urban regeneration. Routledge.
 Petri, P.A. and Plummer, M.G., 2016. The economic effects of the Trans-Pacific Partnership: New
estimates. Peterson Institute for International Economics Working Paper, (16-2).
 Robertson, J., 2016. Coaching leadership: Building educational leadership capacity through partnership.
New Zealand Council for Educational Research. PO Box 3237, Wellington 6140 New Zealand.