This paper analyzes and compares the remuneration approaches used by Saracen Mineral Holdings and Newcrest Mining Ltd. in terms of their effectiveness in encouraging higher performance by executive teams and translating to higher company performance.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING (REMUNERATION APPROACHES)1 MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING (REMUNERATION APPROACHES) By (Name) Name of the Course Professor Name of University City and State Date
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING (REMUNERATION APPROACHES)2 Introduction The main purpose of this paper is to analyze and compare methods of remuneration used by Saracen Mineral Holdings and Newcrest Mining Ltd. In this report, an analysis of how well the approaches of each company worked in encouraging higher performance by the executive teams is given. In addition, this report considers whether or not this performance translated to higher performance of the companies. Remuneration Approach of Saracen Mineral Holdings According to its 2017 financial year annual report, Saracen Mineral Holdings has a remuneration target positioning which is set at the 50thpercentile against the market. The company’s STI is set at a maximum of twenty-five percent (25%) for its Chief Executive Officer (CEO), and at forty-two percent (42%) for other Key Management Personnel (KMP) of the company. The company achieved a hundred percent (100%) of its Long Term Incentive (LTI) targets that had been set for the past three financial years (Saracen Mineral Holdings 2017, pp. 29). The company mainly uses performance linked approaches of remuneration such as Long TermIncentivesandShortTermIncentives.Forinstance,initsLongTermIncentive remuneration approach, Saracen Mineral Holdings rewards its executive employees and key management personnel using performance payments and equity payments, for exceedingly meeting their set targets and objectives. The company also uses other short term incentives such as cash payments for remunerating its staff (Hilton & Platt 2013, pp. 23).These incentives are meant for rewarding the key management personnel of the company in order to motivate them in
MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING (REMUNERATION APPROACHES)3 achieving their individual as well as group targets, thus enhancing achievement of organizational success (Bussin 2014, pp. 14). The performance linked remuneration approach used by Saracen Mineral Holdings in rewarding its executive teams motivated them to achieve higher performance, which led to improved performance of the group company in general (Gitman, Juchau & Flanagan 2015, pp. 10).The company achieved a Total Shareholder Return (TSR) of 832%, which gave it the first place in its peer group. This is primarily attributed to its attractive remuneration methods and incentives (Saracen Mineral Holdings Limited 2017, pp. 29). According tothe 2017 financialannualreport for thecompany,SaracenMineral Holdings Limited recognized an increase of $2,497,000 in the financial year ending 2017. This was a percentage increase of 9.65% (Saracen Mineral Holdings Limited 2017, pp. 76).Although the company does not have a history of dividends paid to its shareholders during the financial year ended 2017, its share price is currently at $1.855, which is a competitive price as compared to its peers in the industry. These significant improvements in the profits, share price and dividends paid by the company can be associated with competitive rewards and remuneration incentives given to its executive team for upon achievement of organizational excellence (Saracen Mineral Holdings Limited 2017, pp. 2). Regarding its business growth, Saracen Mineral Holdings Limited has been focusing mainly on increasing generation of profits and cash (Hill, Jones & Schilling 2014, pp. 9).The companyhasrecordedanimprovedandexpandedproductionthathasmadeanactive contribution in led to realization of more revenue through its positive gold price environment, as well as its declining costs. This enormous business growth has been significantly attributed to
MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING (REMUNERATION APPROACHES)4 great motivation resulting from the attractive remuneration packages rewarded to its executive team and Key Management Personnel (KMP) (Parrino, Kidwell & Bates 2011, pp. 12). Remuneration Approach of Newcrest Mining Ltd The remuneration method of Newcrest Mining Ltd is quite similar to that of Saracen Mineral Holdings. However, there are significant differences in the trends of the approaches used in the two companies. For instance, the Short Term Incentive (STI) outcomes of executives for Newcrest Mining Ltd during the financial year ending 2017 were kept in the range of fifty-seven percent (57%) to sixty-nine percent (69%) of their potential maximum allowed. Additionally, during the year 2017, the company increased the Total Fixed Remuneration (TFR) to three of its nine executive team members. According to the remuneration report of the company, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) received Increased TFR that resulted from annual review of his salary, which was consequential to remuneration benchmarks of his salary against the market practices for this role (Newcrest Mining Ltd. 2017, pp. 74). This remuneration approach for Newcrest Mining Ltd is believed to have encouraged its executive teams in achieving higher performance. For instance, the company achieved Total Shareholder Return (TSR) of one third of its Long Term Incentive grants. Additionally, the company has maintained positive free cash flows in all its operating sites during the financial year ending 2017. This indicates that the company has an improved overall performance (Newcrest Mining Ltd. 2017, pp. 74). In conclusion, as discussed above, the methods or approaches of remuneration used by the two companies are quite similar but slightly different.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING (REMUNERATION APPROACHES)5 References Bussin, M., 2014.Remuneration and Talent Management: Strategic compensation approaches for attracting, retaining and engaging talent. Knowres Publishing. Hill, C.W., Jones, G.R. and Schilling, M.A., 2014.Strategic management: theory: an integrated approach. Cengage Learning. Hilton, R.W. and Platt, D.E., 2013.Managerial accounting: creating value in a dynamic business environment. McGraw-Hill Education. Gitman, L.J., Juchau, R. and Flanagan, J., 2015.Principles of managerial finance. Pearson Higher Education AU. Newcrest Mining Ltd., 2017. Newcrest Mining Limited annual report 2017. Parrino, R., Kidwell, D.S. and Bates, T., 2011.Fundamentals of corporate finance. John Wiley & Sons. Saracen Mineral Holdings, 2017. Saracen Mineral Holdings Limited annual report 2017. Saracen Mineral Holdings Limited, 2017. Retrieved from https://www.investsmart.com.au/shares/asx-sar/saracen-mineral-holdings-limited