Strategies of Equality and Diversity at Workplace: A Case Study on Marks and Spencer

MANAGING A SUCCESSFUL
BUSINESS PROJECT
Unit 6

INTRODUCTION
 Over the years, equality and diversity can be taken as an important term
for every single business at international or national level, because
today’s environment consist of people that differs from each other in
many terms like race, religion, sex, age and many more other elements
(Graf, Brown and Patten, 2018). For efficient work at a workstation it is
much needed for companies to develop effective strategies in order to
reduce various challenges that an individual may face while working
with others that feels different due to some specific reasons like the
person may belong to another religion, or he or she is of a different
colour and so on. This means to give it to different laborers in the
association with work possibilities.

Aim and objectives
Research Aim: “To identify the strategies of equality and diversity at
workplace to reduce number of challenges faced by a company”. A case
study on Marks and Spencer
 Research Objectives:
 To understand the equality along with diversity term in a firm.
 To identify different challenges faced by Marks and Spencer while
following an effective equality & diversity strategy.
 To gain knowledge how positively, equality and diversity impacts upon
employees of Marks and Spencer

Literature Review
Description of the term “equality and diversity for a company
As mentioned by Polachek, (2019), Diversity along with equality are two
qualities that are important to viably control the workforce. In the working
environment, all specialists ought to be dealt with decently. The thought is
that more labourers should feel roused and committed to impartial treatment
busy working. At the point when inconsistent treatment occurs, labourers
fight and sporadically debates will aggravate things much. That isn't solid for
the business. Organizations ought to adhere to approach rights and laws to
keep up a sound working atmosphere. It is along these lines pivotal that the
lower the board or top chiefs ought not segregate as this would raise the
maladministration