This article explores the congruity theory and its impact on gender bias in leadership. It discusses the challenges faced by women in leadership roles and the need for equality. The article also examines the role of gender stereotypes in shaping perceptions of leadership.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Managing a workforce1 Managing a workforce Student Name Name of the Course Professor Name Name of the School City or State located Date
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Managing a workforce2 The congruity theory runs on the idea that the human mind strives for harmony (Health Research Funding, 2019). This means that there should be consistency in individual thought. Roles that involve influence and power in society have normally been perceived to be held by men rather than women. On the other hand, women have been perceived always to hold lower status roles. This form of division of labor gives birth to a belief of what women and men are supposed to do in regards to their gender roles (Hoyt and Burnette, 2013, pg. 3). In relation to the congruity theory, one of the outcomes of the gendered social roles is reduced complimentary attitudes towards women in leadership and power. Besides, the social roles of women are said to match some general characteristics; therefore, any inconsistencies may create a prejudice (Hoobler, Wayne, and Lemmon, 2009, pg. 941). Women in leadership mostly experience this form of prejudice. The reason for this is because the characteristics of the female gender stereotype clash with the “standard” characteristics of a typical leader. Therefore, the evaluation brought forth about women in leadership tends to be negative. The prejudice seen above comes from the incongruity among associated stereotypes, perceived leadership requirements and the female gender role. The biased evaluations acquired from gender stereotypes in leadership are resilient and pervasivesince they maintain men must take charge and women take care (Hoyt and Burnette, 2013, pg. 3). Men are viewed to have features that emphasize self-reliance, dominance and confidence while women are connected with communal features primarily for showing concern to other people. Therefore, men are considered to have the perfect traits needed in a leader due to their agentic qualities which qualify them to have leadership prototypes. According to the congruity theory, the perceived mismatch between female gender prototypes and leader prototypes is the reason for more negative attitudes and prejudice towards
Managing a workforce3 female leaders and women in leadership (Elsesser & Lever, 2011, pg., 1556). This explains the reason why women are underrepresented in leadership roles. In addition, the theory of congruity may tend to be inconsistent in regards to women in leadership if people place personal beliefs ahead of facts (Eagly & Karau, 2002, pg. 575). However, if people decide that facts must outweigh personal beliefs, the theory of congruity can be consistent such that the success of women in leadership can be an evidence that women have the ability to lead and assume more leadership roles.
Managing a workforce4 References Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573-598. Elsesser, K. M., & Lever, J. (2011). Does gender bias against female leaders persist? Quantitative and qualitative data from a large-scale survey. Human Relations, 64(12), 1555- 1578. Hoobler, J.M., Wayne, S.J. and Lemmon, G. (2009) Bosses’ perceptions of family-work conflict and women’s promotability: Glass ceiling effects. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 939- 957. Health Research Funding. (2019).Congruity Theory Explained - HRF. Retrieved from https://healthresearchfunding.org/congruity-theory-explained/ Hoyt, C.L. and Burnette, J.L., 2013. Gender bias in leader evaluations: Merging implicit theories and role congruity perspectives.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,39(10), pp.1306- 1319.