Health and Safety in British Airways

This assignment analyzes health and safety protocols implemented by British Airways. It explores relevant legislation like the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 and Occupational Health and Safety Regulations 2007. The analysis focuses on passenger well-being with specific attention to disabled passengers, animal transportation, electronic device usage restrictions, and prohibited items. Additionally, it delves into workplace safety measures within British Airways to ensure a secure environment for employees.

REPORT

Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1
MAIN BODY..................................................................................................................................1
Safety procedure by Aerfin to deal with life engine Service Company......................................1
Protection/equipments to keep safety in Aerfin...........................................................................1
Health and safety act to deal with the dangerous material..........................................................1
Safety procedure adopted by GE Aviation..................................................................................2
Protection and equipments required to employers.......................................................................2
Health and safety acts which considered in working with engineering workshop......................2
Safety procedure of British Airways in plane..............................................................................2
Protection/equipment would be given by employees to keep safety...........................................3
Health and safety acts which considered at dangerous height.....................................................3
CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................3
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................4

INTRODUCTION
In respect to focus on the report, there are several functions and operations has been
implemented that need to focus on the effective functioning (Liu, Huang and Chen, 2015). In this
regard, present report consist case of British Airways, GE Aviation and Aerfin. They all are
considered process to make effective functioning in the business for expansion of operations and
functions.
MAIN BODY
Safety procedure by Aerfin to deal with life engine Service Company
In the business, following steps must be taken:
 In respect to deal with the procedure of Aerfin with Engine Service Company, they need
to focus on the assets that purchasing, leasing and trading in major commercial aircraft
and engines.
 In respect to implement the process, they require technical and commercial experts to
access capital.
 They are also provided professional and efficient solution to consider strategy.
 Along with this, the company also requires components which support to attain creative
results at workplace.
Protection/equipments to keep safety in Aerfin
There are several protections and equipments has been implemented to keep safety in
chosen business:
 In order to maintain and keep safety at workplace of Aerfin, eye protection and machine
guard need to provide to each candidate so that injuries could be diminish.
 In addition to this, operations and functions could also implement smoothly so that
general information could be kept safe with various hazards.
 Along with this, for avoiding accident, it is important to look towards the machine that
equipped with emergency shut off.
Health and safety act to deal with the dangerous material
Following acts are consider to deal with dangerous material in business:
1

 There are several acts determines health and safety with dangerous material. In this
aspect, first is Occupational health and safety Act 2004.
 In respect to implement the above act, employers of Aerfin have duty to provide and
maintain employee’s safety.
 Furthermore, The Occupational health and Safety regulation also considered which helps
to protect the employees from Hazards substances.
 It parts assists to consider some details matter that how enterprise deal with the different
activities (Liu, Huang and Chen, 2015).
 In addition to this, welfare at work implemented that consider and understand legal duties
towards employees at workplace. It helps to make sure that effectiveness will be develop
to focus on the employees safety.
In order to consider COSHH regulations, it can be stated that law requires control
substance which prevent hazards to health. In this way, manager of the company need to prevent
and reduce workers exposure to hazards substances which help to decide to prevent harm to
health.
Safety procedure adopted by GE Aviation
Safety procedure by GE Aviation
 GE evolve their continuous safety procedure through they can attain desired results in
their business.
 In this consideration, team of the enterprise need to take safety in operating design and
manufacturing to meet with the intent.
 Therefore, they assure that it is drive to recognition policies and compliance to attain
systematic results.
 Furthermore, Aviation industry also implement quality standards as the serve model for
accreditation and international recognition for safety programs (Liu, Huang and Chen,
2015).
Protection and equipments required to employers
Protection and equipments requirement for employees
 All the employees of GE Aviation bound with Official Secret Act. Therefore, it
considered generalisation in manufacturing units.
2

 In this way, employers keep security to consider occupational nurse and implement
circuit board.
 GE is going with the well and beyond regulatory requirements so that care of staff exists
due to accident and emergencies.
 Furthermore, there are fifty-nine employees received basic aid of work in training so that
it could be support to work in 13 building with almost 1800 employees.
 In addition to this, the country also ensures high population building in different corner
site so that it will help to estimate average age of workforce.
Health and safety acts which considered in working with engineering workshop
Health and safety regulations
 In respect to maintain health and safety in the business environment, it is essential to look
upon the Work Health and Safety Regulations 2011.
 In this way, GE Aviation can implement all hazards chemicals which need to classified
and labelled with global harmonium system.
 Therefore, it assists to maintain hazards system within the group of chemical In addition
to this, towards the dangerous goods, it is important to look for the classified transport
(Brauer, 2016).
 As results, it will assist to implement DG classifications with effective marketing system
which used in the transport setting.
 In addition to this, health and safety policy also need to implement to focus on the some
important rules and regulations to display copies.
 Requirement also need to undertaken on the basis of first aid provision.
In GE Aviation, there are different aspects has been considered which assists to provide
all aspects in term of environmental, health and safety program. Therefore, it will assist to
consider following aspects:
 Preparing OSHA voluntary protection program audits.
 Reviewing, updating and posting different EHS programs with policies and training
material.
 Assisting management in accident investigation to determine root cause.
 Environment project also helps to include and site the waste maps outline for different
sampling plan.
3

 Complete assigned EHS tasks and project develop with administrative duties.
In respect to implement regulation of Noise Work 2005, it can be stated that industry
sector attain different consideration to focus on the protected from excessive noise at theor work
place. It could be termed for hearing and suffer from the tinnitus. Furthermore, in the GE
Aviation, employees requires proper protection in term of hearing. This act has been taken for
new requirement which replace with 1989 to introduce different things at workplace. It tells
about harm and noise cause at workplace.
Safety procedure of British Airways in plane
 In respect to deal with the British Airways functions and operations, it is important to
look towards the flight safety awareness.
 It is developed for conscious of companies regarding health and safety which keep
personnel safe when they are travel (Sousa, Almeida and Dias, 2014).
 It is implemented to maintain and keep security to consider knowledge and awareness in
safety procedure.
 In this way, activities are design with the tea and coffee on arrival, course
commencement and health and safety introduction, full exercise with keep safety advice,
information and techniques.
Protection/equipment would be given by employees to keep safety
 In respect to look towards the present case, it has been determines that assistance from
aircraft is depend on the airport which either considered by electric burry or airport
wheelchair.
 In addition to this, assistance from the aircraft depending in the airport so that it help to
implement stairs that are parked with terminal building.
 In the cabin flight also develop to get seat and move towards the upper body strength
(Bhola, 2015).
 It is depend on the airport to select the wheelchair or other option which generally
provided by the British Airways.
 Hence, safety measurement considered with the implementation of the proper
functioning.
4

Health and safety acts which considered at dangerous height
 In respect to deal with the health and safety act, it is important to look towards the
occupational legislation.
 In this consideration, in the British Airways mainly Health and Safety at work Act 1974
determines which assists to look towards the primary piece in the great Britain.
 In this aspect, the organisation needs to protect their enterprise with hazards to keep
security and maintain effectiveness at workplace.
 Therefore, they are able to implement proper functioning with considered most important
rules and regulations (Speed, Westerhoff and Yang, 2015).
 In addition to this, it includes general duties of employers regarding their employees to
maintain and keep proper security as well.
 Employer need to ensure that effectiveness in the enterprise increasing with the proper
arrangements and keep security as well.
 Along with this, Occupational health and Safety regulations 2007 also need to
implemented which made under the act.
 It considers specification duties which imposed and performed to support the act.
In respect to consider regulations in British Airways, following aspects will be consider:
 Passenger with disability
 Carrying animals
 Restriction to use electronics device.
 Smoking and drinking alcohol on the board of aircraft
 Forbidden items in baggage
 Limits on measurement, size and weight of baggage
CONCLUSION
From the above report, it can be summarised that in every enterprise security need to
maintain with implement proper resources. In this aspect, it is important to look towards the
provision and acts that determines by the government must follow to maintain effectiveness.
5

REFERENCES
Books and Journals
Bhola, S.S., 2015. A study of quality of work life in casting and machine shop industry in
Kolhapur. March 2006.
Brauer, R.L., 2016. Safety and health for engineers. John Wiley & Sons.
Liu, X., Huang, G and Chen, W., 2015. Safety climate, safety behavior, and worker injuries in
the Chinese manufacturing industry. Safety science, 78, pp.173-178.
Sousa, V., Almeida, N.M. and Dias, L.A., 2014. Risk-based management of occupational safety
and health in the construction industry–Part 1: Background knowledge. Safety
Science, 66, pp.75-86.
Speed, D., Westerhoff, P. and Yang, Y., 2015. Physical, chemical, and in vitro toxicological
characterization of nanoparticles in chemical mechanical planarization suspensions used
in the semiconductor industry: towards environmental health and safety
assessments. Environmental Science: Nano, 2(3), pp.227-244.
6