This document provides study material on market microeconomics, including answers to questions on tooth decay among children and the impact of taxing Alcopops on teenage binge drinking. It also suggests solutions to reduce tooth decay and alcohol-related harms.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someoneās learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: MARKET MICROECONOMICS Market microeconomics Name of the student Name of the university Author note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
2MARKET MICROECONOMICS Answer 1) According to the health report produced by the Australian government health report it has shown that tooth decay mong children and among the low-income earners has increased at a rate of 10% since the year 2000 (Cowell 2018). Therefore it is recommended that the government should be subsidising the dental care for the low income earners and also for the children. Subsiding the dental care will lead to reduction in the tooth decay problems for the children as well as for the low income earners. Figure1Effect of subsidy When the government will be providing subsidies for the dental care, the children of the low-income earners will be able to spend more on the dental care which will help them to take care of their teeth and prevent tooth decay. From the above diagram it can be seen that after the subsidy the supply curve shifts downward and therefore the amount of quantity bought by the consumers will increase (Baumol and Blinder 2015). The initial price was P3
3MARKET MICROECONOMICS and after the subsidy the price falls down to P1. As the price decreases, the quantity demanded also rises. A subsidy can be therefore referred to the payment made to the consumers or firms in order to encourage a rise in output. A subsidy usually shifts the supply curve to the right by lowering the equilibrium price in the market. Answer 2) a) Figure2Inelastic demand A tax on Alcopops will not help in the reduction of teenage binge drinking and the various alcohol related harms and hospitalization. The reason behind this is that alcohol is an inelastic product (Iossa and Martimort 2015). The demand for alcohol will not go down even if the government taxes heavily for the product. As people who drinks become addicted and therefore are willing to pay higher price for alcohol. Therefore, by taxing Alcopops the government cannot reduce harms related to alcohol.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4MARKET MICROECONOMICS Figure3Laffer curve Increasing the tax rate although does not always increases the tax revenue. As the above diagram shows that the revenue of the government will diminish when the rate of tax will be increasing beyond the optimal level which is T*. As the tax rate is quite higher than the optimal rate, therefore it can be said that the revenue might have increasedalittlebittillthepointT*,afterwhichithadstartdiminishing (Microeconomics 2015). b)When the demand of the product is much more inelastic in nature than the supply, at that time the consumers will be bearing more of the tax (Cowell 2018). As the demand of Alcopops is inelastic in nature, therefore in this case the buyers of Alcopops have to bear the greater burden of tax. No, as from the question it can be predicted that the outcome of tax was not at all efficient in nature. c)The government can introduce awareness campaigns about the usage of alcohol, it can also introduce various rules and regulations which will prevent peoplefromconsumingalcoholinpublicplaces(BaumolandBlinder2015). Therefore, it can be said by introducing awareness campaigns, implement rules and
5MARKET MICROECONOMICS regulations and educating the teenagers about the demerits of alcohol consumption can help in reducing teenage binge drinking and alcohol related harms.
6MARKET MICROECONOMICS Reference list Baumol, W.J. and Blinder, A.S., 2015.Microeconomics: Principles and policy. Nelson Education. Cowell, F., 2018.Microeconomics: principles and analysis. Oxford University Press. Iossa,E.andMartimort,D.,2015.Thesimplemicroeconomicsofpublicāprivate partnerships.Journal of Public Economic Theory,17(1), pp.4-48. Microeconomics, E.E., 2015. KELVIN WONG.Cell,808, pp.386-8406.