Critical Evaluation: The Conversation We Shouldn't Be Having Following Another Mass Shooting

Running Head: CRITICAL EVALUATION
“THE CONVERSATION WE SHOULDN'T BE HAVING
FOLLOWING ANOTHER MASS SHOOTING”
Students ID:
Name of the University
Authors Note

2
CRITICAL EVALUATION
Introduction
Mass shootings have emerged in the Contemporary American society as an
implication of profound political and cultural significance. In fact, the first issues is that the
news media have often characterised them as the label of crisis. Secondly, they have
incessantly been relating this massive shooting incident with mental illness as they are
witnessing repeated mass shooting one after the other. They have a single status on the
modern psychology of collective consciousness that is not occupied with other types of
violence.
Thirdly, mass shootings have precisely gained the states of being related to mental
illness. It can be argued that just because their violence transcends into an immediate action
in itself, it is necessary to note the three-fold states of violence, acts of violence that are being
done on the bodies of the victim and on the minds of the witness along with the collective
society.
However, as seen from the Sarah Moyer's review on the mass shooting, it is a familiar
theme. In the existing years, national conversation about shooting violence has burned down
the narrative that is being amplified by the media that essentially points towards mental
illness as the significant cause for shooting and mass shootings.
Discussion
Mental illness has turned highly politicizes in the gun control argument as seen in
Moyer’s review, yet the connection between psychological issues and violence is not found to
be straightforward enough. Along with it mental addresses to say with an over-simplistic
narrative that signifies millions of American people who have a psychological problem with
falsified notions of being dangerous.

3
CRITICAL EVALUATION
Chen et al., (2015) stated that societies use to perceive the religious fact of evil in
order to understand terrible crimes associated with violence. However, in the modern
scenario, the earliest alternative illustration of the fact is that a killer must be suffering from
mental illness. In support of this, Swanson et al., (2015) commented that it is just an
assumption that most of the common people readily get in to. There is indeed some truth
attached to the thinking. Rozel and Mulvey (2017) argued that in certain high profile public
massive violent act, such as in Tuscon, Arizona and Colorado, it has been clarified enough
that psychotic indication related to delusions, hallucination resulting from schizophrenia,
forced the shooters action. However, the major problem of the public is that they irrationally
over judge the issue in terms of all massive shootings.
Apart from these issues, McGinty et al., (2014) contradicted extensive news media
coverage related mass shooting incident typically includes discussion over violent behaviour
in line with mental illness. These, type of equation is usually not correct, as people suffering
from mental illness are more likely to be the victims of severe crime other than being the
aggressors where most of them do not get involved with violence.
In this context, Baumann and Teasdale (2018) stated that in a more recent survey, it
has been that almost 71% of the people admitted that they are unwilling to work with people
suffering from severe mental problems and 46% amongst them viewed those individual
comparatively more harmful than normal people. According to McGinty et al., (2016)
research in this regards, suggest that it is the media coverage that feeds that individuals
suffering from severe mental health issue are disproportionately focused on violent attitude.
Similar to the statement of Moyer in her review, this issue of relating mental problem
with shooting is more of racial discourse discriminating people based on their socioeconomic
status. It has been found that people with severe illness often face discrimination that events