Strategy Development Tools for Business Success: A Case Study of IKEA
Verified
Added on 2023/01/18
|6
|1644
|36
AI Summary
This essay discusses the importance of strategy development tools in business and uses IKEA as a case study to demonstrate their application. It explores PESTEL analysis, Five Forces analysis, SWOT analysis, and generic strategies used by IKEA to gain a competitive edge in the furniture retail industry.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Student Name INSTITUTIONAL AFFILIATION(S) MASTERS IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
P a g e|1 Introduction Businesses that comprehends significance behind strategy development tools before designing their future strategies are the ones who remains successful than other competitors while working in an environment that perceives fast change and fierce competition(Durmaz & Dusun, 2016). To assist organisations, many researchers and authorsestablished strategy development tools and models out of which four significant tools will be discussed further in this essay. To relate these developmental tools with practical business example, this essay will use case example of IKEA operating in furniture retail industry. IKEA has been listed among top furniture manufacturing and retailing companies worldwide who operates successfully in around 40 countries(Lu, 2012). PESTEL Analysis PESTLE analysis is one of the strategic management tools that is used by businesses to evaluate external impacts on business environment concerning political, economic, social, technological, environmental and legal factors. It is good process to evaluate external factors as it captures potential issues and risks by spotting business opportunities along with warning for any significant threats present. This further helps management to shape future planning so that it works with ever- changing business environment as well as developing new objectives before starting new projects(Rastogi & Trivedi, 2016). Politically, IKEA has to face various challenges pertaining changes seen in regulatory practices and governmental policies. Though IKEA majorly deals in developed and developing countries, taxes and third-party interventions impacts IKEA’s business significantly. Economic fluctuations add to the impacts for IKEA as any changes in country economies it deals with effects prices of raw materials and labour turnover negatively(Lu, 2012). Social trends are considered by IKEA critically and therefore, it has to modify its product designs and supply systems to meet current market demands.Technologically, IKEA have always considered technology and innovation in its activity so that the company is able to provide cost-effective and functional products in innovative manner. IKEA has always shown sensitiveness towards environment as it uses all its resources effectively, considering waste management systems for which IKEA remains environmentally considerable company(Sandybayev, 2017). However, this international company still has to face many legal barriers and issues seen majorly due to its third-party manufacturers. Five Forces analysis Porter’s five forces analysis rationalises that to manage organisations strategically, management needs to analyse competition present in the industry it operates in. Based on analysis, managers can then identify threats from new entrants, recognising suppliers bargaining power, identification of consumers bargaining power, threats of substitutes as well as acknowledging rivalry among business competitors. These five elements comprise five forces that are faced
P a g e|2 usually by organisations and must be managed strategically and in planned way to sustain competitive edge in the market(Tehrani & Rahmani, 2014). IKEA stores are usually placed in suburban areas to provide customers with more parking facilities along with bigger shopping space. Most of the new brands typically targets metropolitan cities and thereby this force remains weak for the company. Bargaining power of suppliers also remains weak force for the company due to availability of large number of furniture manufacturers in local areas that are ready to be a part of IKEA’s business. Bargaining power of customers, however, remains strong force due to availability of many competitive brands who provides similar kind of furniture in lesser price or with improved quality. IKEA’s global strategy and unique supply chain management considers undertaking corporate social responsibility and since all of the products manufactured by IKEA remains self-assembled and cost-effective, threats from substitutes remains weak force for the company(Sandybayev, 2017). However, intense rivalry can be seen among existing brands dealing in furniture retail industry and IKEA has to face strong force from its few rivals like Walmart, Tesco, Amazon and Wayfair(Bhasin, 2018). SWOT analysis SWOT analysis can be defined as a significant yet simple management tool which helps organisations to analyse and evaluate systematic procedure to identify firm’s critical success factors comprising internal strengths along with weakness, external threats and opportunities. SWOT is been considered as chief development tool that can tackle complicated strategic conditions pertaining organisation as it is very easy to be followed and reduces the requirement of data to assist strategic managements. It gives managers critical information regrading factors that needs to be handled, strengths that can be improved, seizing opportunities and avoiding threats in best possible way that minimise organisation weaknesses(Helms & Nixon, 2010). The biggest strength in IKEA’s is implementation of strategic practices like optimum use of raw materials which helps in reducing overall cost of finished products and operational costs in its manufacturing plants due to the use of recycled materials. Due to highly competitive market, weaknesses are found in IKEA like improper controlling of every business unit alongside not able to manage suppliers while neglecting IKEA’s ethical code IWAY that brings company into limelight. Since the company encourages reduced carbon emissions and zero waste targets with improved stakeholders’ relationships, it brings opportunities for IKEA in gaining sustainable business development(IKEA, 2018). Threats like global recession and suppliers’ problems threatens IKEA in constant manner alongside change in social trends showing low interest among first time buyers for self-assembled furniture over traditional ones(Lu, 2012).
P a g e|3 Generic strategies To gain competitive edge, firms need to respond promptly and adequately by developing a well-defined and planned market-oriented strategy. Generic strategy created by Porter is considered by most of the contemporary organisations as his model enables management to establish a sustainable and profiteering market along with value creation for the buyers. Strategies that provides superior organisational performance includes cost leadership and differentiation or focus strategy. Cost leadership describes whether a firm may gain economy of sale by gaining cost advantage or not whereas differentiation is used by firms to offer diversified products range through different marketing approach or by emphasising on other functional area(Kinyuira, 2014). According to Porter’s generic strategies, IKEA follows cost-leadership strategy by providing goods in lows cost that are delivered in flat-packaged way which needs to assembled by the customers themselves, thereby saving supply and transportation costs also. This reflects that IKEA focuses on low costs for gaining market competition to win over its competitors’ prices. Differentiation strategy followed by IKEA can be seen to some extent since the company utilises technology for producing innovative products that are liked by its customers(Gondal, n.d.). Besides, every IKEA store comprises unique store designs with inbuiltchildren play area and in-house restaurants that provides its customers with exclusive shopping experience(IKEA, 2017).
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
P a g e|4 References Bhasin, H., 2018.Ikea competitors.[Online] Available at:https://www.marketing91.com/ikea-competitors/ [Accessed 17 04 2019]. Durmaz, Y. & Dusun, Z. D., 2016. Importance of Strategic Management in Business. Expert Journal of Business and Management,04(01), pp. 38-45. Gondal, S., n.d.Identify how IKEA has achieved differentiation from its competitors? ANSWER Differentiation Strategy.[Online] Available at: https://www.academia.edu/8001455/Identify_how_IKEA_has_achieved_differentiatio n_from_its_competitors_ANSWER_Differentiation_Strategy [Accessed 17 04 2019]. Helms , M. M. & Nixon, J., 2010. Exploring SWOT analysis – where are we now? : A review of academic research from the last decade.Journal of Strategy and Management,03(03), pp. 215-251. IKEA, 2017.It’s the people who make the company.[Online] Available at: https://www.ikea.com/ms/en_US/the_ikea_story/working_at_ikea/work_areas_huma n_resources.html [Accessed 17 04 2019]. IKEA, 2018.About social and environment.[Online] Available at: https://www.ikea.com/ms/en_JP/customer_service/faq/help/about_ikea/ social_environment.html#1 [Accessed 17 04 2019]. Kinyuira, D., 2014. Effects of Porter’s Generic Competitive Strategies on the Performance of Savings and Credit Cooperatives (Saccos) in Murang’a County, Kenya.Journal of Business and Management ,16(06), pp. 93-105. Lu, Y., 2012.SWOT, PESTEL, Porter’s 5 Forces and Value Chain analysis of IKEA. [Online] Available at:https://www.academia.edu/7711696/SWOT_PESTEL_Porter_s [Accessed 17 04 2019]. Rastogi, N. & Trivedi, . M. K., 2016. PESTLE Technique - A Tool to Identify External Risks in Construction Projects.International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET),03(01), pp. 384-388. Sandybayev, A., 2017. Strategic Supply Chain Management Implementation: Case Study of IKEA.Noble International Journal of Business and Management Research, 01(01), pp. 5-9. Tehrani, M. B. & Rahmani, F., 2014. Evaluation Strategy Michael Porter's five forces model of the competitive environment on the dairy industry (Case Study: Amoll
P a g e|5 Haraz Dvshh dairy company).American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER), 03(05), pp. 80-85.