Audit and Non-Audit Services: Advantages and Disadvantages

This report discusses the advantages and disadvantages of engaging auditors to perform non-audit services. It also explores the views of accounting and council groups on this issue.

MASTERS OF
ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCE
ASSIGNMENT

1
By student name
Professor
University
Date: 25 April 2018.
1 | P a g e

2
Contents
Part 1...........................................................................................................................................................3
Executive Summary.................................................................................................................................3
Introduction.............................................................................................................................................3
Discussion and Analysis...........................................................................................................................3
Conclusion and Recommendation...........................................................................................................5
Part 2...........................................................................................................................................................6
Background of the audit..........................................................................................................................6
Discussion and Analysis...........................................................................................................................6
References.................................................................................................................................................12
Appendix...................................................................................................................................................14
2 | P a g e

3
Part 1
Report for Financial Reporting Council
Executive Summary
A business report has been prepared on the topic audit and non-audit services offered by the auditors to
the clients. The report distinguishes between the two and shows the advantages and disadvantages of
engaging the auditor to perform the non-audit services from the perspective of the client or the
company. The report also mentions the views and opinion of the various distinguished groups of
accounting and councils and finally the conclusion has been given as to whether the auditors should be
prohibited from providing the non-audit services to the audit clients (Alieid, 2016).
Introduction
There have been several studies on the audit and non-audit services being conducted by the statutory
auditors of the company because of which there have been several independence issues in the past and
thereby the true and fair view has been compromised with in the audit report. The auditors in such a
scenario are basically biased towards the client and therefore companies like Enron, WorldCom and
Satyam has collapsed over the years. Recently, there was an update and recommendation from
Competition and Markets Authority’s Audit Services Market Study (CMA) in UK where they proposed for
separation of the audit and non-audit services into different legal entities within the audit firm so as to
ensure independence. The proposal is under discussion and consideration by Financial Reporting Council
(FRC) in Australia (Ehalaiye, et al., 2018).
Discussion and Analysis
Audit firms may be asked to provide the non-audit services to the client or company which may not
involve giving an opinion on the financial statements. Audit is an independent examination of the books
of accounts whether profit making or not, private or public, to give an opinion on the true and fair view
of the books of accounts prepared by the entity. It is a statutory requirement which is compulsory as per
law and has different laws and regulations stated for same in Corporation Act, 2001. During the audit,
the auditor has an obligation to express his opinion thereon on the financial statements and the auditor
has to comply with IFRS and local legislations. Typically it involves assessment of the risks in business,
assessment of the adequacy and sufficiency of internal controls, obtaining evidence on the stated
assertions, designing procedures to detect errors and frauds and to consider and assess if the client is a
going concern entity (Defond & Lennox, 2017).
On the other hand, the non-audit services are voluntary and the scope of the work is usually not defined
by any statute and is generally as per the agreement between the entity and the audit firm. By
definition, non-audit services are the professional services rendered by the audit firm during the audit
engagement period but the work is not connected with the audit or review of the financial statements.
Some of the such non-audit services include book keeping, tax filing services, valuation and appraisal
services, internal audit outsourcing services, actuarial services, management and human resource
function related services, implementation of system or software, legal and other expert services other
3 | P a g e

4
than audit, information system design, advocacy or litigation services on behalf of the client (DeZoort &
Harrison, 2016).
From the perspective of the company, when the auditor provides the non-audit services as well, the
company gets closer to the auditor and the auditor is more or less dependent on these non-audit
services for extra revenue. In this way, the client can supersede the interests of the auditor and can
influence their decision in the audit report in some or the other way. This makes the company attractive
avenue for the auditor in terms of bundled services so even though the auditor may be rotated after a
period of 5 or 10 years as per the laws and regulations, the auditor is still associated with the company
in terms of non-audit services (Bailey, et al., 2017). This also helps the company in getting non-audit
services being performed at lower cost as compared to the market rates. In case any deficiency in found
in the internal control or internal audit or in information system of the company , it is easier to convince
the auditor rather than in the scenario if the audit would have been performed by another auditor. In
some cases, clients also threaten to change the auditor if they do not get the favourable result of the
company’s audit report. Furthermore if there is any deficiency in the internal control system or the
financial system, the same can be settled internally with the auditor without being highlight to the
investor and other stakeholders in the annual report which helps in saving the goodwill and reputation
of the company and thereby affecting adversely to the share prices. One of the other advantages of this
is that all the inefficiencies pointed out in statutory audit can be resolved internally in advance if the
non-audit services like internal audit is also being done by the same auditor (Gassen & Schwedler, 2010).
On the other hand, there are several disadvantages as well to the company. Some of them being the
possibility of impaired report as the independence of the auditor is compromised in some way or the
other and he is bound to give the biased report. The same was the case of Arthur Anderson in case of
Enron scandal and PWC in case of Satyam. Furthermore, the professional scepticism of the auditor is
being compromised in this case and the chances of erroneous report increases, which may lead to loss
of goodwill and credibility of the company in the eyes of the stakeholders and investors if the faulty
audit report is being issued (Sonu, et al., 2017). This may also lead to non-correction of the internal
control issues, if any in the entity as the same might not be reported to the client. This may also lead to
huge penalties and loss for the company in future when the same is disclosed publically in the future
and the company might land up in the position of liquidation or bankruptcy as it may not come to know
the overall risks in the financial and internal system of the company.
As regards the decision on whether the auditors should be prohibited from providing the non-audit
services to their audit client, the discussion is wide and non-ending. There can be several advantages as
well as disadvantages of this scenario both to the entity in question as well as the auditors but it all
depends on the approach of the client entity and professional scepticism and independence being
practices by the auditor. The audit work conducted by the big 4 consulting firms have come under
scrutiny and the joint committee on corporations and financial services mentioned that the audit quality
over the past few years has deteriorated and that there should be a “serious review” mechanism for the
audit which has encountered several issues due to market dominance and conflict of interest that arises
due to the range of other activities being conducted by these firms apart from audit (Hoopes, et al.,
2012). It also mentioned that the big 4 firms have become corporate insiders rather than the
4 | P a g e

5
independent outsiders scrutinising the accounts of the company. They fail to fearlessly audit and
scrutinise the accounts as that may prove to be detrimental to the business interests of these consulting
firms. As per one of the surveys 95% of the companies on ASX200 is being audited by Big 4 but the
revenue share of these firms from audit has come down drastically to 14% and 21% in the last financial
years. The statutory audits have become more of side business when compared to the consulting and
non-audit services being provided by them. In Australia, there has been a conflict on the quality of audit
between ASIC and FRC and it has been found that in one out of every 5 audits, there is no sufficient
assurance that the financial statements are free from error and it is mainly because of the non-
independence due to provision of non-audit services. All these issues have led to increased chances of
risk with audit reports and its viability for decision making purposes (Mubako & O'Donnell, 2018). The
local arms of the big 4 consulting firms in Australia have rejected the proposal of their UK counterparts
to stop providing the non-audit services to large listed companies. The UK big 4 consulting firms have
stopped providing the non-audit services to their clients as per one of the recently conducted studies.
Conclusion and Recommendation
From the above discussion and analysis, it can be said that banning of the non-audit services all together
can be detrimental to the interest of the Big 4 consulting firms. Therefore, if adequate safeguards are
being ensured, both these types of services can benefit the client as well as the accounting and auditing
profession as a whole. Furthermore, in line with the discussion made above, the ideal scenario would be
that the non-audit services should not be banned all together instead only those services should be
banned that is likely to impair the integrity, objectivity and independence of the auditor. In that case,
the interest of both the parties can be sustained and it will also help serving the profession of
accounting and auditing well.
5 | P a g e

6
Part 2
Memorandum
To: XYXYXYXYX, Audit Partner
From: ZZZZZZZZZ, Senior Analyst
Date: 18th April, 2018
Subject: Planning memorandum for the company Myer Holdings Limited
Background of the audit
In the given case, an audit planning memorandum is prepared for the audit partner for the company
Myer Holding Limited for the year 2016. The memo highlights the major risks to the company and the
reason as to why the same is risk for the company. The analytical procedure has been performed by the
way of horizontal analysis as well as ratio analysis of the company. It also mentions the inherent risk in
the business that are being identified from the analytical procedures. One of the key accounts has been
identified and the related assertion being at risk of material misstatement has been stated in the memo.
As assessment of the overall inherent risk in the company has been conducted and materiality has been
defined in absolute amount by the way of workings. This memo is intended to help the audit team in
planning the audit of the entity in hand (Henderson, et al., 2014).
Discussion and Analysis
The company being analysed here is Myer Holdings Limited which is listed on the Australian Stock
exchange. The company is an upmarket departmental store chain operating in all the states of Australia.
It deals in a range of products including men, women, children clothing, accessories and footwear,
computer, electrical, cosmetic, furniture, toys, books, confectionary, food, travel, homewares and
flooring and bedding material, etc. The company was established in the year 1900 and employs over
14000 people (Choy, 2018).
a. Some of the major risks for the company are mentioned below:
i. Huge investment in New Myer: the company is making a huge investment in the new in-
store and Omni channel experiences in accordance with the 5 year strategy of the
company but it is not sure as to when the company will be able to retrieve the returns
out of it. The company also made a huge investment in the world’s first virtual reality
store launched in Christmas in partnership with eBay. The opening of the Warringah
store in November 2016 is another milestone as it is representative of true embodiment
of the customer led strategy. But all this can have a severe impact on the cash flows of
the company (Werner, 2017). There is huge capital expenditure in the years to come by
and therefore the same may also have a negative impact on the cash flows.
6 | P a g e

7
ii. Considerable drop in the operating Gross profit by 164 basis points which is due to
increase in the operational costs. This is also on account of higher cost of sales and
higher concession mix.
iii. Drop in the net profit by 10.6% from $ 77.5 Mn to 69.3 Mn. Similarly the Earnings before
interest and tax has declined by 15% over the last year. The main reason for the same is
increase in the cost of doing business and the cost of sales, which needs to be effectively
managed. The higher opex and capex spend has to be managed effectively.
iv. The Australian dollar depreciation is one of the another risks and reason behind the
falling profitability and therefore the foreign exchange losses should be effectively
managed by having an appropriate hedging policy in place (Sithole, et al., 2017).
b. Results of the Analytical procedures
Below mentioned are the results of the analytical procedures conducted on the financials of the
company. The workings for the same has been shown in the appendix section of the assignment.
1. Liquidity Ratios
Current Ratio = Total current assets/ Total current liabilities 2016 2015
Total current assets 479,738 480,804
Total current liabilities 520,585 481,389
Result 0.92 1.00
Liquid ratio /Quick Ratio = (Total current assets - Inventory - Prepaid
expenses)/ Total current liabilities 2016 2015
Total current assets - Inventory - Prepaid expenses 83,441 98,897
Total current liabilities 520585 481389
Result 0.16 0.21
2. Debt Management Ratios
Debt ratio = (Total Debts / Total Assets) or ((Total assets- total
owners' equity)/total assets) 2017 2016
Total Debts 760,133 1,023,532
Total Assets 1,867,898 1,886,548
Result 41% 54%
Debt to Equity Ratio = (Total Debt/Total owners' equity) or
((Total assets- total owners' equity)/total owners' equity) 2017 2016
Total Debts 760,133 1,023,532
Total owners' equity 1,107,765 863,016
Result 69% 119%
7 | P a g e

8
3. Efficiency Ratios
Receivables Turnover Ratio = Sales/Accounts Receivable 2016 2015
Sales 3,289,568 3,195,626
Accounts Receivable 37,883 30,363
Result 86.83 105.25
Days Receivable = 365/Receivable turnover 2016 2015
No. of days 365 365
Receivable turnover 86.83 105.25
Result 4.20 3.47
Inventory Turnover = COGS/Inventory 2016 2015
COGS 1,527,552 1,495,382
Inventory 396,297 381,907
Result 3.85 3.92
Days' Inventory = 365/Inventory Turnover 2016 2015
No. of days 365 365
Inventory turnover 3.85 3.92
Result 94.69 93.22
Fixed Assets Turnover = Sales/net Fixed Assets 2016 2015
Sales 3,289,568 3,195,626
Net Fixed Assets 445,379 469,006
Result 7.39 6.81
Total Assets Turnover = Sales/Total Assets 2016 2015
Sales 3,289,568 3,289,568
Total Assets 1,867,898 1,886,548
Results 1.76 1.74
4. Profitability ratios
Profit Margin / Net Profit ratio = Net income / Sales 2016 2015
Net income 60,543 29,826
Sales 3,289,568 3,195,626
Result 1.84% 0.93%
Operating Margin ratio = Operating Profit/Sales 2016 2015
Operating Profit 114,035 133,348
Sales 3,289,568 3,195,626
8 | P a g e

9
Result 3.47% 4.17%
Return on Equity = Net income/total owners' equity 2016 2015
Net income 60,543 29,826
Total owners' equity 1,107,765 863,016
Result 5.47% 3.46%
Return on Assets = Net income/total assets 2016 2015
Net income 60,543 29,826
Total Assets 1,867,898 1,886,548
Result 3.24% 1.58%
In the given case, we can see there are several factors which would trigger further investigation in the
audit based on the horizontal analysis and the ratio analysis. The company’s sales has increased
marginally by 2.9% whereas the sales concession or the discount or rebate has increased by 21.8%
which calls for the review of the same. The other operating revenue has increased by 23% which should
be checked for its components (Linden & Freeman, 2017). The restructuring and brand exit costs, and
impairment costs have decline by 70% over previous year inspite of several developments and major
restructuring and therefore the same needs to be examined. In terms of the balance sheet, it should be
examined why the company is carrying huge inventory for both the years and how the company has
paid off the loan and borrowings inspite of huge requirement of funds for restructuring purposes.
In terms of ratio analysis, both the current as well as quick ratio have declined and are much below the
industry trend indicating in the insufficiency of liquid assets to meet the short term obligations. In terms
of the solvency, the debt equity ratio has improved from 119% to 69% which is an improvement in the
risk status of the company (Jefferson, 2017). In terms of the efficiency ratios, the receivable turnover has
declined due to which the receivable days has increased but it is still better as compared to industry
trend. The inventory turnover on the other hand has declined which has had a negative impact on the
inventory days and thus the company needs to access and find ways to churn the inventory well. The
fixed assets turnover has increased which is a positive sign for the company. In terms of the profitability,
the net profit margin has doubled to 1.84% but the same is extremely low as compared to the industry
average. The operating margin ratio has declined substantially due to increase in cost of sales and
concessions which is a risk and needs to be controlled. Both the return on equity as well as the return on
the assets has improved marginally but again it is well below the market rate of returns and thereby
hurting the shareholder’s expectations (Goldmann, 2016).
c. The four major inherent risks that can be identified from the business risks and the analytical
procedures are mentioned below:
i. Investment in the New Myer and other restructuring measures which is having an
overall impact on the cash flow. There is uncertainty in the market as the Australian
market is highly competitive and the company’s position may be negatively impacted
9 | P a g e

10
due to new entrants, increase in online competition, existing competitor policies
(Heminway, 2017).
ii. Financial Risk: Increase in the sales concession without substantial increase in the sales
which needs to be reviewed further as this is one of the main reason for the fall in the
operating margin percentage and lower levels of profitability and ROI. The company has
also not recognised the provision in the books of accounts for litigation which is due
against Portfolio Law Pty Ltd on behalf of Melbourne City Investments Pty Ltd (MCI) as
the company is not aware of the size of the claims (Marques, 2018).
iii. There is huge risk in the strategic and the internal business plan of the company as if it
fails in coming years, it may impact the sales, profitability, market position, share prices
and reputation of the company as a whole.
iv. The company is facing several external and macro-economic risks like that of Australian
dollar fluctuation, natural and unforeseen events, poor investor and customer
confidence, change in the government policies and weakness in the global economy as a
whole which might have a serious impact on the sales.
d. One of the key accounts which seems to be under risk is sales concession account and the risk of
material misstatement is quite high in this as the sales have grown by just 2.9% whereas the
sales allowance or the concession has increased by 21.8%. This shows that the company has
provided 7-8 times the original discount in order to trigger the sales. This also indicates the risk
that the company is selling the goods at losses.
The key related assertion here is the classification and completeness of the expenses booked
under the head sales allowance. It may be that the company has classified the cost of goods
sold or the advertisement and publicity expenses under the head sales allowance to show that
the goods are being sold at profit. The auditor should be checking the invoices at individual level
and should also check the arithmetical accuracy and classification of the sales concession
expenses to be sure if the company has reported the numbers correctly (Lessambo, 2018).
e. The overall ingredients of the inherent risks in the company have been shown in part c and
categorised into 4 parts namely cash flow and competition risk, financial risk, strategic and the
internal business plan risk and the external and macro-economic risks. The same has been
assessed based on the risks highlighted through analytical reviews and those highlighted in the
Director’s report of the company. Some of the factors which have led the company to assess all
this are expected operating and retail market conditions, competitive pressure, changing
government policies, exchange rate fluctuations and weakness in Australian dollars. The
company is also aware of the uncertain economic conditions and the risk associated with the
internal strategies and business plans. The company has implemented measures to mitigate the
technological and cyber security risks, people management risks and other related risks (Vieira,
et al., 2017). One another reason which has led to the assessment of the inherent risks in the
business is the sharp transformational strategy that the company has started to execute in the
last year with the horizon of 5 years as stated in the annual report. The company has shown
10 | P a g e

11
strong focus on this transformation and renovation in strategy and is expecting a turnaround in
the sales growth and overall performance of the company.
f. The materiality for the company has been shown below. Determination of materiality is one of
the most important and critical step at the start of the audit as it helps the auditor in identifying
which all accounts have to be checked and what can be ignored. It helps the auditors to
channelize the efforts in the right direction (Raiborn, et al., 2016).
(Amt in $'000)
Myer Holdings Limited
Quantitative estimate of materiality
Criterion Base Amount Materiality level/range
0.5% to 1% of gross revenue Gross Revenue 3,289,568 16447.84 to 32895.68
1% to 2% of the total assets Total Assets 1,867,898 18678.98 to 37357.96
1% to 2% of the gross profit Gross Profit 1,274,291 12742.91 to 25485.82
2% - 5% of the shareholders's equity Equity 1,107,765 22155.3 to 55388.25
5% to 10% of the net profit Net profit 60,543 3027.15 to 6054.3
Materiality is something which has the ability to change the financial or economic decision of
the user. There are several accounting bodies round the world like that of AASB and IASB which
have prescribed several ways for determination of the materiality, some of which are
percentage of revenue, gross profits, total assets, equity and net profit. The same has been
shown above. In this case, materiality can be considered in between the range of $12742 and
$25485 as it would help in checking and reviewing all the critical account and none of the
significant accounts would be left from the scope of audit. The range of gross profit has been
considered appropriate as the net profit range is quite low considering lower profitability of the
company and in case gross revenue range or equity range is considered many of the material
accounts may get ignored from the scope of audit.
11 | P a g e

12
References
Alieid, E. E. M., 2016. The Role of Accounting Information Systems in Making Investment Decisions.
Internal Auditing & Risk Management, 11(2), pp. 233-242.
Bailey, C., Collins, D. & Abbott, L., 2017. The Impact of Enterprise Risk Management on the Audit
Process: Evidence from Audit Fees and Audit Delay. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37(3), pp.
25-46.
Choy, Y. K., 2018. Cost-benefit Analysis, Values, Wellbeing and Ethics: An Indigenous Worldview Analysis.
Ecological Economics, 3(1), p. 145.
Defond, M. & Lennox, C., 2017. Do PCAOB Inspections Improve the Quality of Internal Control Audits?.
Journal of Accounting Research, 55(3), pp. 591-627.
DeZoort, F. & Harrison, P., 2016. Understanding Auditors sense of Responsibility for detecting fraud
within organization. Journal of Business Ethics, pp. 1-18.
Ehalaiye, D. et al., 2018. Are Financial reports useful? The views of New Zealand Public vs Private Users.
Australian Accounting Review.
Gassen, J. & Schwedler, K., 2010. The decision usefulness of financial accounting measurement
concepts: evidence from an online survey of profesional investors and their advisors.. European
Accounting Review, 19(3), pp. 495-509.
Goldmann, K., 2016. Financial Liquidity and Profitability Management in Practice of Polish Business.
Financial Environment and Business Development, 4(3), pp. 103-112.
Heminway, J., 2017. Shareholder Wealth Maximization as a Function of Statutes, Decisional Law, and
Organic Documents. SSRN, pp. 1-35.
Henderson, S. et al., 2014. Ethics in accounting. Issues in financial accounting, 15(1), pp. 949-971.
Hoopes, L., Mescall, D. & Pittman, J. A., 2012. Do IRS audits deter corporate tax avoidance?. The
Accounting Review, pp. 1603-1639.
Jefferson, M., 2017. Energy, Complexity and Wealth Maximization, R. Ayres. Springer, Switzerland.
Technological Forecasting and Social Change, pp. 353-354.
Lessambo, F., 2018. Audit Risks: Identification and Procedures. Auditing, Assurance Services, and
Forensics, 3(1), pp. 183-202.
12 | P a g e

13
Linden, B. & Freeman, R., 2017. Profit and Other Values: Thick Evaluation in Decision Making. Business
Ethics Quarterly, 27(3), pp. 353-379.
Marques, R. P. F., 2018. Continuous Assurance and the Use of Technology for Business Compliance.
Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, pp. 820-830.
Mubako, G. & O'Donnell, E., 2018. Effect of fraud risk assessments on auditor skepticism: Unintended
consequences on evidence evaluation. International Journal of Auditing, 22(1), pp. 55-64.
Raiborn, C., Butler, J. & Martin, K., 2016. The internal audit function: A prerequisite for Good
Governance. Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance, 28(2), pp. 10-21.
Sithole, S., Chandler, P., Abeysekera, I. & Paas, F., 2017. Benefits of guided self-management of attention
on learning accounting. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(2), p. 220.
Sonu, C., Ahn, H. & Choi, A., 2017. Audit fee pressure and audit risk: evidence from the financial crisis of
2008. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics , 24(1-2), pp. 127-144.
Vieira, R., O’Dwyer, B. & Schneider, R., 2017. Aligning Strategy and Performance Management Systems.
SAGE Journals, 30(1), pp. 23-48.
Werner, M., 2017. Financial process mining - Accounting data structure dependent control flow
inference. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 25(1), pp. 57-80.
13 | P a g e

14
Appendix
Myer Holdings Limited
Consolidated statement of profit or loss
Particulars 2016 2015 Variance
$’000 $’000 $’000 %
Total sales value 3,289,568 3,195,626 93,942 2.9%
Concession sales -610,553 -501,153 -109,400 21.8%
Sale of goods 2,679,015 2,694,473 -15,458 -0.6%
Sales revenue deferred under customer loyalty program -38,861 -40,122 1,261 -3.1%
Revenue from sale of goods 2,640,154 2,654,351 -14,197 -0.5%
Other operating revenue 161,689 131,423 30,266 23.0%
Cost of goods sold -1,527,552 -1,495,382 -32,170 2.2%
Operating gross profit 1,274,291 1,290,392 -16,101 -1.2%
Other income 71 108 -37 -34.3%
Selling expenses -842,217 -828,906 -13,311 1.6%
Administration expenses -318,039 -328,138 10,099 -3.1%
Share of net profit/(loss) of equity-accounted associate -620 0 -620 100.0%
Strategic review, restructuring, store and brand exit costs
and impairment of assets -18,250 -61,687 43,437 -70.4%
Earnings before interest and tax 95,236 71,769 23,467 32.7%
Finance revenue 906 753 153 20.3%
Finance costs -15,447 -23,488 8,041 -34.2%
Net finance costs -14,541 -22,735 8,194 -36.0%
Profit before income tax 80,695 49,034 31,661 64.6%
Income tax expense -20,152 -19,208 -944 4.9%
Profit for the period attributable to owners of Myer
Holdings Limited 60,543 29,826 30,717 103.0%
Cents Cents
Earnings per share attributable to the ordinary equity
holders of the Company:
Basic earnings per share 7.7 5.1 2.6 51.0%
Diluted earnings per share 7.7 5.1 2.6 51.0%
14 | P a g e

15
Myer Holdings Limited
Consolidated statement of financial position
Particulars 2016 2015 Variance
$’000 $’000 $’000 %
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents 45,207 53,323 -8,116 -15.2%
Trade receivables and prepayments 37,883 30,363 7,520 24.8%
Inventories 396,297 381,907 14,390 3.8%
Derivative financial instruments 351 15,211 -14,860 -97.7%
Total current assets 479,738 480,804 -1,066 -0.2%
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 445,379 469,006 -23,627 -5.0%
Intangible assets 904,171 916,108 -11,937 -1.3%
Deferred tax assets 27,056 18,016 9,040 50.2%
Derivative financial instruments 80 0 80 100.0%
Investment in associate 9,203 0 9203 100.0%
Other non-current assets 2,271 2,614 -343 -13.1%
Total non-current assets 1,388,160 1,405,744 -17,584 -1.3%
Total assets 1,867,898 1,886,548 -18,650 -1.0%
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables 400,590 387,182 13,408 3.5%
Provisions 94,228 85,728 8,500 9.9%
Deferred income 10,812 6,997 3,815 54.5%
Current tax liabilities 7,033 512 6521 1273.6%
Derivative financial instruments 7,127 99 7028 7099.0%
Other liabilities 795 871 -76 -8.7%
Total current liabilities 520,585 481,389 39,196 8.1%
Non-current liabilities
Borrowings 147,273 441,179 -293,906 -66.6%
Provisions 19,754 21,198 -1,444 -6.8%
Deferred income 69,702 75,112 -5,410 -7.2%
Derivative financial instruments 2,819 4,654 -1,835 -39.4%
Total non-current liabilities 239,548 542,143 -302,595 -55.8%
15 | P a g e

16
Total liabilities 760,133 1,023,532 -263,399 -25.7%
Net assets 1,107,765 863,016 244,749 28.4%
EQUITY
Contributed equity 739,338 524,755 214,583 40.9%
Retained earnings 379,483 335,366 44,117 13.2%
Reserves -11,056 2,895 -13,951 -481.9%
Total equity 1,107,765 863,016 244,749 28.4%
16 | P a g e