Analysis of Adelaide's 30-Year Plan: Movement and Accessibility

This report examines the Greater Adelaide 30-Year Plan (2010 and revised 2017), focusing on movement and accessibility within the urban and regional context. It explores the relationship between accessibility and transport infrastructure, analyzing how transport networks shape urban structure. The report details key transport strategies and policies outlined in the plan, including the integration of land-use and transport, strategies for improving public transport share, and the role of Transit-Oriented Developments (TODs). It investigates the links between housing and transport strategies, the integration of different transport modes, and the plan's approach to increasing public transport usage. Furthermore, it provides a comparative analysis with planning strategies in other Australian capital cities, such as Melbourne and Sydney, offering insights into the plan's effectiveness and broader urban planning trends. The report emphasizes the importance of integrated planning, affordable transport, and the creation of connected communities to enhance the overall quality of life for Greater Adelaide residents.

MASTERS OF URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING
By Name
Course
Instructor
Institution
Location
Date

Introduction
The 30-Year plan adopted by the Greater Adelaide in the year 2010 focuses on the creation
of a form of the urban center which is walkable through a pronounced shift away from the
current state of the system (Xia, et al 2015). As a result, the plan has prioritized revitalization of
the current neighborhoods while concentrating on the development of the transit corridors. This
particular paper focuses on the provisions of this particular plan in regard to the movement as
well as accessibility.
Question 1
Accessibility and infrastructure
Accessibility is the measure of the capacity of any region to be reached by or in simple
terms to reach various locations. This implies that the arrangement, as well as the capacity of the
transport infrastructure, is some of the important elements in the accessibility determination. The
mobility is a choice that is determined by the users(Xia, et al 2015). It is therefore regarded as a
means to effectively evaluate the impacts of the investment in the infrastructure as well as its
efficient relation to the policies of the transport on the development of the region. A well
developed and efficient system of transportation will definitely offer higher levels of
accessibility in that particular region. This is the core reason why there is a close link of
accessibility with an array of social and economic opportunities.
In terms of economic development as well as social expansion, the areas are never equal. This is
because some of the areas tend to be more accessible than others. This basically implies that
there exists some sort of inequalities. Accessibility is can, therefore, be treated as a proxy for the
inequalities. Accessibility has generally relied on two major concepts including:

The first concept is the location. This is where there is relative space measurement
estimation in relation to the infrastructure of the transport system. This is because such
infrastructure offers mean to the transport movements. Each and every location possesses a series
of attributes which includes but not limited to the other level of the economic activity.
The second concept of accessibility is distance. Distance is derived from the existing
physical separation between different locations(Xia, et al 2015). The existence of such distance
will only be possible in the cases where two locations can be linked via means of the
infrastructural system. The expression is generally the friction of the distance. Any area that has
the least friction as compared to others will definitely be treated as the most accessible region.
The expression of such kind of friction is done in terms of the units of kilometers or in time
although the application of others variable s as energy or cost can as well be used.
Question 2
How transport network/infrastructure shape urban structure?
The transport network can have its definition given in terms of nodes as well as links. In
this particular paper, the issue has been addressed in terms of links and nodes. The development
of the network of transport has a significant impact on the growth of the cities. It’s this impact
which has been studied in terms of the economies of the regions. The infrastructure supply will
definitely impact on the productivity of the other(Easthope, Hudson and Randolph 2013). The
factors of the production in the sectors including labor as well as capital will be treated useful in
case of the substitution requirement. This is the reason why areas with improved infrastructure
experience improvements in terms of the factor of productivity. As a factor of production, proper
networks of the roads will definably offer the required opportunities for the market expansion.

Considering that the infrastructural networks of the transport are immobile and localized, the
consequences include the spatial productivity in specific landscape whereby certain regions
including cities will be more developed than other locations. The construction of the network of
roads will definitely have a polarizing effect in the spatial coordinates. The degree of this kind of
polarization will be dependent on the network nodes(Ruming 2018). This is to say that when the
nodes are too high like for the case of the road networks, the degree of polarization will
definitely be low. Similarly, when the nodes are very low like for the case of the railways or
networks of the aviation, the potential of polarization will be higher.
This can be illustrated by the schematic diagram illustrated in the figure below
Question3
In order to deliver a more accessible as well as connected Greater Adelaide, one of the
essential factors will be integrated land-use planning as well as transport(Stankov et al 2017). A
city that is focused on the transit for the efficient movement of goods, people and services must
be created. Access to the transport system which is affordable is one of the critical issues for the
majority of the population especially the elderly since it can help them remain independent,
access proper healthcare and sustain social networks. An expanded and redesigned network of

the buses, proper investments in rails and roads will basically provide the much-needed
infrastructure. In order to adopt the above-suggested requirements, urban planners have adopted
strategies and policies. Some of the policies include the following:
 Maintenance of access to the market with minimal interference to on the major transport
routes. This will ensure that despite the disruption, business still continues.
 Increase in the number of the main streets, neighborhoods and activity centers with such
places given more access to people than vehicles.
 Improvement in the safety as well as amenity of stops of public transport interchanges
and stations through the improvement of their connections to the adjacent activities of
development.
 Implementation of the new housing program that will be permitted in the places that are
adjacent to major transport routes as well as airports.
 Improvement on the infrastructure in areas of cycling through the provision of universally
convenient as well as accessible connections to the centers of the activities.
 Encouragement of the car share scheme as well as the use of points of electric car
chargers in the corridors of the transit, centers of activity, neighborhoods of higher
densities.
 Reduction in requirements of car parking in the areas that are mixed adjacent to high-
frequency services of public transit(Nguyen, Recknagel, and Meyer 2018)
Question 4
The 30-year plan of Greater Adelaide recognizes that for most of the residents,
transportation of the second-largest yearly cost undertaking after housing. There has been a

limited offer of public transport in the Greater Adelaide. The plan has, therefore, sort to
establish coordination among various departments which play a role in transportation and
housing to assist in the creation of the connected communities. Such kind of partnership will
be beneficial to the Greater Adelaide that has been experiencing limited staff as well as
resources. Synchronization among different agencies will very crucial.
Considering the metropolitan nature of Greater Adelaide, the type of transportation will
vary as well. The low-income residents who reside in the periphery of Greater Adelaide will
definitely struggle to get downtown and other places in Greater Adelaide(Sharma et al.
2016). In comparison, the residents with the low income will need options of the transport to
access employment opportunities in various parts of the Greater Adelaide-some of which are
in the farms, healthcare facilities among others. The establishment of regulated vanpooling
programs as well as subsidized mechanisms by the 30- Year Plan will completely solve these
challenges in Greater Adelaide. Considering the position as well as accessibility in the site
for housing in Greater Adelaide. The land availability will, however, determine the ease with
which residents will be accessing the alternative options of the system of transport.
Question 5
Integration of different modes of transport
Through the promotion of the discussion about the present state of the transportation by
developing the new infrastructure for cycling through the program of Arterial Road Bicycle
Facilities is a great one. This likely to be one of the best ways to achieve the conciliation
incentives of different transport modes through the integrated approach of transport for social
inclusion, accessibility, and quality structuring. When the new road Connector of 78km

North-South Corridor is expanded, it will definitely improve the connectivity to the north.
Also by doing the upgrade to the Darlington interchange will assist greatly in the
improvement of the connectivity between the Flinders percent as well as Tonsely. Such
alternative routes will contribute very significantly to the system of transport within the
region.
The presented proposal on the 30-Year Plan is to provide a long term solution which
has been providing support to the growth of the urban. It will definitely be in line with the
demand for transport by offering other alternatives for the locomotion through road network
expansion besides improving the existing ones(Pollard, Ward and Koth 2017). Prioritization
of sufficient system of the transport will be a factor of sustainability since, through such
conceptions, it will be possible to properly balance the preposition ways of optimizing the
current system of transportation in Greater Adelaide. The integration program of different
ways of transport including roads, railways and even air targets expansion of the terminal
points for each and every mode of transport(Sandhu et al 2018). The 30-Year plan of the
development of Greater Adelaide recognizes the terminal points as the point of
interchangeability for various transport modes in Greater Adelaide. The identification of the
best way to have such networks expanded while giving consideration to the special category
including use of bike without compromising urban mobility will be just interesting move.
This goes alongside increase if the security at the terminals for example improved security,
as well as increased patronage in the case of the railways, installation of the CCTV cameras,
will all be meant to ensure 24 operations of the integrated transport system.
Question 6

What is the role of TODs with respect to transport?
In any vibrant economic regions like Adelaide, Transit Oriented Development
commonly known as TODs plays a very important role. TODs represents a perfect
opportunity or chance to effectively provide accessibility of public transport by people. The
system actually offers the choice of travel thereby encouraging healthier outcome through
physical activities which are incidental including walking and cycling, reduced car
dependency and finally improved quality of air through car use reduction. TOD is about
offering the choice of transportation or acts as an agent to support the growth as well as the
development of transit-friendly structures within the urban structures(Ritchie and Stephan
2018). This basically implies that through TOD it will be possible to get a sustainable urban
structure. The 30-Year Plan has comprehensively highlighted TOD as a key pillar in the
facilitation of the principles of the transport.
Question 7
How does the 30-Year Plan propose to improve the share of public transport?
The plan is focused on ensuring that at each and every sector of the transport system is
given a fair share of the demand for transport by the people of Adelaide. It is through
recognition of this fact that the plan seeks to improve, extend as well s prioritize cycling and
walking infrastructure through provision of universally, safe, convenient and accessible
connections to the centers of the activities(Bunker 2015). The plan to reduce requirements of
the car parking in the case of the mixed-use areas found close to high-frequency public
transit services will definitely encourage the utilization of other alternative modes of
transport. This goes alongside improving safety as well as amenity of the stops of public

transport and protection of present and future strategic requirements of roads as well as
rails(Robinson and Liu 2015).
Question 8
Despite the fact that Adelaide is lower and smaller growth metropolitan region as
compared to Sydney and Melbourne, there is similarity in the planning policy directions. The
30-Year plan of Greater Adelaide identifies growth that is anchored on the centers with key
activities which are closely connected to the system of the transport(Arthurson, Lawless and
Hammet 2016). Also, the identification of the designated areas of growth within the growth
boundary of the urban has become an interesting area of focus. The proposed development
incorporates the accommodation and mixed use of varying housing types as a reflection of
the changing needs of the aging population of Australia. The plan just like other strategies of
Melbourne and Sydney sets out several numbers of targets as indicators to be used in the
progress assessment.
Conclusion
In conclusion, tackling contemporary challenges within the urban centers, there is a
greater need to effectively understand the capabilities as well as the abilities if the resources
that are in existence. The planning policies of metropolitan places like Greater Adelaide
should focus on utilizing and harnessing these resources. This particular paper has identified
the transport system as one such key resource whose contribution can never be undermined
but instead be pursued at whatever cost.

References
Arthurson, K., Lawless, A. and Hammet, K., 2016. Urban planning and health: Revitalising the
alliance. Urban Policy and Research, 34(1), pp.4-16.(
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08111146.2015.1129943)
Bunker, R., 2015. Can we plan too much?–the case of the 2010 metropolitan strategy for
Adelaide. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 74(3), pp.381-389.(
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_ylo=2015&q=Bunker%2C+R.
%2C+2015.+Can+we+plan+too+much%3F–
the+case+of+the+2010+metropolitan+strategy+for+Adelaide.
+Australian+Journal+of+Public+Administration%2C+74%283%29%2C+pp.381-389.&btnG)
Easthope, H., Hudson, S. and Randolph, B., 2013. Urban renewal and strata scheme termination:
balancing communal management and individual property rights. Environment and Planning
A, 45(6), pp.1421-1435.( https://scholar.google.com/scholar?
hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_ylo=2013&as_yhi=2019&q=Easthope%2C+H.%2C+Hudson
%2C+S.+and+Randolph%2C+B.%2C+2013.+Urban+renewal+and+strata+scheme+termination
%3A+balancing+communal+management+and+individual+property+rights.
+Environment+and+Planning+A%2C+45%286%29%2C+pp.1421-1435.&btnG=)
Ritchie, L. and Stephan, A., 2018. Engineered timber for apartment buildings in Melbourne,
Australia: A construction cost comparison with traditional concrete systems. In International

Conference of the Architectural Science Association (pp. 161-168).(
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_ylo=2015&q=Ritchie%2C+L.
+and+Stephan%2C+A.%2C+2018&btnG=)
https://livingadelaide.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/319809/The_30-
Year_Plan_for_Greater_Adelaide.pdf
https://www.sa.gov.au/topics/planning-and-property/planning-and-land-management/the-30-
year-plan-for-greater-adelaide
Nguyen, H.H., Recknagel, F. and Meyer, W., 2018. Effects of projected urbanization and climate
change on flow and nutrient loads of a Mediterranean catchment in South
Australia. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology.( https://scholar.google.com/scholar?
hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_ylo=2013&as_yhi=2019&q=Nguyen%2C+H.H.%2C+Recknagel
%2C+F.+and+Meyer%2C+W.
%2C+2018.+Effects+of+projected+urbanization+and+climate+change+on+flow+and+nutrient+l
oads+of+a+Mediterranean+catchment+in+South+Australia.+Ecohydrology+
%26+Hydrobiology.&btnG=)
Pollard, G., Ward, J. and Koth, B., 2017. Aquaponics in Urban Agriculture: Social Acceptance
and Urban Food Planning. Horticulture, 3(2), p.39.( https://scholar.google.com/scholar?
hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_ylo=2013&as_yhi=2019&q=Pollard%2C+G.%2C+Ward%2C+J.
+and+Koth%2C+B.%2C+2017.+Aquaponics+in+Urban+Agriculture

%3A+Social+Acceptance+and+Urban+Food+Planning.+Horticulture
%2C+3%282%29%2C+p.39.&btnG=)
Robinson, G.M. and Liu, Z., 2015. Greening and “un” greening Adelaide, South Australia. AIMS
Enviro Sci, 2, pp.511-532.( https://scholar.google.com/scholar?
hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_ylo=2013&as_yhi=2019&q=Robinson%2C+G.M.+and+Liu%2C+Z.
%2C+2015.+Greening+and+“un”+greening+Adelaide%2C+South+Australia.
+AIMS+Enviro+Sci%2C+2%2C+pp.511-532.&btnG=)
Ruming, K., 2018. Establishing and delivering a vision for urban regeneration and
renewal. Urban Regeneration in Australia: Policies, Processes, and Projects of Contemporary
Urban Change, p.2.( https://scholar.google.com/scholar?
hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_ylo=2013&as_yhi=2019&q=Ruming%2C+K.
%2C+2018.+Establishing+and+delivering+a+vision+for+urban+regeneration+and+renewal.
+Urban+Regeneration+in+Australia%3A+Policies%2C+Processes
%2C+and+Projects+of+Contemporary+Urban+Change%2C+p.2.&btnG=)
Sandhu, H., Clarke, B., Baring, R., Anderson, S., Fisk, C., Dittmann, S., Walker, S., Sutton, P.,
Kubiszewski, I. and Costanza, R., 2018. Scenario planning including ecosystem services for a
coastal region in South Australia. Ecosystem Services, 31, pp.194-207.(
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?