MBA: Corporate Governance

Running head: MBA: CORPORATE GOVERNENCE
MBA: corporate governance
Name of the student
Name of the university
Authors note

MBA: CORPORATE GOVERNENCE
1
Table of Contents
Answer to question 1......................................................................................................2
Answer to question 2:.....................................................................................................3
References:.....................................................................................................................5

MBA: CORPORATE GOVERNENCE
2
Answer to question 1
In the late 1980’s despite of having a good quality and market capture Australia had
faced a tough situation owing to a massive degradation in the economics and it had made the
Australian companies saw a big collapse in their business and the major responsible factor on
that case was stakeholders (Samra, 2016.). The short run entities used profit performance
model to privatise the concerns. For example concerns like railway, coal, electricity and gas
had been made privatized. On the other hand the Anglo American companies had been
providing lucrative incentives to the employees for strong board level performance. However
the hostile bids had often financed to high risk high end junk bond. However thee scenario
had changed when the major companies of united states and the names of Ivan Boesky,
Michael Levine and Michael Milken went down to the corporate governance with junk faced
financing areas (Tricker, 2000).. However in Australia names of Alan bond, Laurie Cornell
had faced the same situation. Nomura securities having link up with the payment of
international clients had also faced the same problem which had let the chairman of the
company to resign (Eberlein, et al.,2014).
Reasons for failure:
There had been ample number of reasons which had because Roth wells limited to fail
and collapsing. The reasons are as follows –
1. Not performing the duties properly: it is seen from the reports published in the article
stating that since the beginning of the business, the company had not performed well in
the market and had not fulfilled all the duties appropriately. However they were
dominated by new entrepreneur and start-up companies that had forced them to stop the
business.