The report investigates, the comparison between McDonalds and Hungry Jacks. Due to increasing competition in the current food market, it has become important for the experts to examine the business opportunities and market structure of the organizations for the future development.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head:ECONOMICS AND FINANCE FOR BUSINESS Economics and Finance for Business Name of the student Name of the university Author note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1ECONOMICS AND FINANCE FOR BUSINESS Abstract The report investigates, the comparison between McDonalds and Hungry Jacks. Due to increasing competition in the current food market, it has become important for the experts to examine the business opportunities and market structure of the organizations for the future development. After the introduction of globalization in the current industry, the availability of technological and economic opportunities have brought the huge changes in economic and social situation of the customers. With the increasing business opportunities, the organizations have started expanding the business in international market so that with the increasing rate of profitability strong brand image can be developed. Analyzing the market structure of both the organizations, it has been identified that McDonalds has adopted the strong market structure compared to Hungry Jacks. On the other hand, it is true that from the last 5 years the company is maintaining its constant position in the fast food industry. The major dissimilarity regarding the food products is hungry Jacks provides vegan, which is not available in McDonalds. In case of developing the strong market structure of Hungry Jacks it needs to focus on developing the strong market structure.
2ECONOMICS AND FINANCE FOR BUSINESS Table of contents 1.0 Introduction..........................................................................................................................................3 2.0 Market structure...................................................................................................................................3 Growth strategies.......................................................................................................................................5 Pricing and non-pricing strategies..............................................................................................................7 5.0 Conclusion.............................................................................................................................................8 6.0 Reference list......................................................................................................................................10
3ECONOMICS AND FINANCE FOR BUSINESS 1.0 Introduction As stated byKuan(2018), in case of evaluating the emerging market structure of an industry, the strategic analysis plays an effective role. Using the effective strategic analysis initiative, it becomes easier for the organizations to grab the attention of large number of customers. After the introduction of globalization in the current industry, the availability of technological and economic opportunities have brought the huge changes in economic and social situation of the customers. With the increasing business opportunities, the organizations have started expanding the business in international market so that with the increasing rate of profitability strong brand image can be developed.The purpose of this study is to introduce beneficial marketing strategies so that the organizations will be able to survive in the international market.By analyzing the business environment, the growth strategy of two organizations have been examined. By highlighting the famous companies namely McDonals and hungry jacks, the marketing strategies and marketing structure of these organizations have been discussed. In the year 1955, Macdonald was established in US as a food selling company. Within few years it has become the fastest growing organization in the fast food industry. With the increasingmarketdemand,marketpriceofthecompanyhasreached US$163.82(Mcdonalds.com, 2018). It can be assumed that if the company will be able to maintain its constant growth, it will be easier for the organization to establish its strong position in the global market. Total numbers of 37200 stores have been introduced in international market by McDonalds. Hungry Jack’s is the chain of Burger King Corporation that established in 1971 on 18th April in Australia (Hungryjacks.com.au, 2018). Within few years the company has established a competitive image in the fast-food selling industry in Australia. In the year 2017, the market share reached $37.8 million. 2.0 Market structure It cannot be denied that using the effective market structure the company has gained its popularity in the market.With the help of effective delivery service, it has developed strong customer base. With the increasing customer base, it has reached near about 52 million customers in internationalmarket (Mcdonalds.com, 2018).In caseofgainingtheloyal customers, it has recruited a customer support team, where all the needs and quarries of the customers are being solved. It has been identified that the market structure of the company has been classified into different competitiveness as well as pricing. There are large numbers organizations in the market, which are trying to create tough position for the company called McDonalds. However, in case of maintaining the monopoly business in the global food industry, it has decided to increase its market power by introducing diversified products in the market. It
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4ECONOMICS AND FINANCE FOR BUSINESS has been identified that McDonalds operates the oligopoly market type. In case of analyzing the international market strategy of the company, it can be said that it has employed 1.5 million peoplein117countries.Theglobalsalesofthecompanywas$22billionin2009 (Mcdonalds.com, 2018). Differebt restaurant brands such as Donatos pizza, Pret A manger, Boston Market and Aroma Caféare being operated by the company. The global products of Mcdonalds are chicken veggie burger, veg pizza, mozzarella dipper, Burbur Ayam McD and many more. Figure: McDonalds Maharaja Burger (Source: Mcdonalds.com, 2018) Although, the company has developed its strong brand image in the market, but it cannot be denied that in the burger selling industry, KFC is an important competitor of McDonalds. It case of maintaining the strong competitive position in the market, McDonalds has launched “Maharaja Burger”to give the competition to the ‘Burger King’of KFC. Figure: Global market share (Source: Mcdonalds.com, 2018) In the above diagram the global market share of McDonalds has been highlighted. it has been identified from the above diagram organizations like 7-Eleven, KFC, Subway, and Burger King, McDonalds iskeeping its holding position from the year 2009.
5ECONOMICS AND FINANCE FOR BUSINESS Figure: Hungry Jacks Combo offer (Source:Hungryjacks.com.au 2018) Hungry Jack’s Pty Ltd. is being considered as one of the popular fast food organization in the Burger King Corporation. As the US food chain Burger King will not be able to launch own brand in the Australian food market, due to this reason in the year 1971 on 18thApril hungry jacks was launched in the Australian market. It has been identified that depending on the market growth of the company it has been identified that in the year 2017, the market share of the company reached $37.8 million. Analyzing the product popularity of the company, it has been identified that it has introduced different types of combos for the Chicken lovers. In the growth comparison of both the organizations, it has been identified that both the organizations have established strong positions in the market, however, in case of market structure, McDonalds has performed well. As it has developed large numbers of stores in the market and by introducing diversified products, it has grabbed large numbers of customers’ attention. It has helped McDonalds to maintain the competitive position in the market. On the other hand, in case of hungry jacks, it has been identified that due to lack of diversified products in the market, the company can face the tough situation. Bringing the diversified products in the market the company Hungry Jacks will be able to maintain its competitive position in the foreign market. It is also true that introducing the effective market structure, it will be able to maintain its sustainable position in the market. Growth strategies The food market is one of the most competitive market in all the sector of the global basis. This is evident from the secondary research which is done using the secondary data for the growth and development strategies of the company. 3.1 What the business have done or are doing for the growth or expansion Both the companies have their own share of growth strategies which have helped them to access the profit and market share of the firm in the span of time.Grant, (2016) states that both Mc Donald’s and Hungry Jacks are trying to grow their business shares by the using their own company’s growth strategies (Morley et al. 2012). Mc Donald’s has implemented the Velocity Growth Plan in which
6ECONOMICS AND FINANCE FOR BUSINESS they have accessed to their pillars of growth to retain, regain, convert their strategies and customers for better exchange of ideas and to strengthen the customer base in the span of time. The digital growth and the growth of the delivery experience are one of the chief growth factors for Mc Donald’s. Rumelt, (2012) states thatthe growth strategies of Hungry jacks includes the implementation of a better tagline as well as the inclusion of more items in the menu including organic beef. The overall strategies of the Hungry Jacks is very basic that does not do much to the growth of the company in terms of business The business are actually hoping for an organic growth in the overall business of the firm by the use of different growth strategies for the development of the new product or achieving the level of vertical growth in the overall strategies (Kumar, 2016). The competency of the firm are being assessed with the diversification in the business which is achieved in the case of Mc Donald’s but not that much in the case of Hungry Jacks. However, these strategies could be anti-competitive according to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (Australian Federal Government, 2018) because one of the firms has global presence and caters to a large number of consumers whereas the other is a national based company with limited presence. The whole of the competition between two companies is unequal (Kumar, 2016). 3.2 Opportunities for growing of business Johnston & Bate, (2013) states thatMc Donald’sis in a position to capture greater market share since it is one of the greatest and most booming fast food companies operating on a global basis. The overall business opportunities in the span of Mc Donald’s is greater than Hungry Jacks. It could grow its business better by implementing more strategies as well as the greater inclination towards the expansion of business.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7ECONOMICS AND FINANCE FOR BUSINESS Figure – Increase in the growth of Mc Donald’s (source -Rumelt, 2012) The amount of innovation as well as the strategies involved in the evolvement of the business arenas is one of the major sectors in which the increase of the business opportunities of business is being conducted. The overall element of increase in the business of the sector is being done in contrast to Hungry Jacks which is one of the premium national based companies of the times. The rate of increase is greater in the case of Mc Donald’s due to their overall market presence and good development and innovation strategies. Pricing and non-pricing strategies 4.1 A contrasting pricing strategy for McDonald’s and Hungry Jacks The products offered by Mc Donald’s as well as Hungry Jacks are similar in nature as they both cater to the fast food genre and also adhere to the youth of the countries. Mc Donald’s sells burger as well as other junk items including the beverages that have been a favorite for the people in the longest time. However, Hungry Tides is specialized in the production of burgers as well as the other forms of food items that are fast in nature. The overall organization is based upon the manufacture of burgers and normal junk food which has the taste for the local people of the Australian origin. The company being one of the natives of the premises knows the taste of the people and therefore majorly focusses on the needs and demands of the people who are the residents of the nation. Phillipov, (2013) states thatHungry Tides provides something extra for the customers which are not provided by Mc Donald’s namely the regional taste in their food as well as the organic beef that is being used by the company in the recent times. Both the sectors and companies are under the same umbrella of fast food manufacturing brands however, both have their own levels of strategies for the growth of the industries and to have the reasonable pricing for catering to the maximum number of people. ProductPricingandstrategyofMc Donald’s Pricing and strategy of Hungry Jacks Burgers$5.85$6.20 Meal (Large)$11.30$11.60 Chicken Meal (Large)$10.35$10.60 Family Boxes$27.95Null Figure – Comparison of prices of the various meals and burgers (Source –Nagle & Müller, 2017)
8ECONOMICS AND FINANCE FOR BUSINESS The pricing strategy of Pizza Hut on the affordable side in comparison to the Hungry Jacks and also the fact that they both have their own loyal customers that do more good to them. In addition, they provide more business opportunities and ventures to the overall facets of the company and to make sure that the pricing strategy that is being followed by Mc Donald’s has both access to the individual and family means of the company. Tassey, (2012) states thatMc Donald’s focusses on the pricing and products that are anchored to the people who are best for the people who want to enjoy the food and also have their pricing level set in terms of the pricing that is being adjusted for the pricing of Hungry Jacks. However, in contrast to Hungry Jacks the pricing of Mc Donald’s has a contrast to its level of freshness and quality which according to customers is better for the national company. Jones, Gregory & Kervin, (2012) states that inUSA has also experimented this kind of a pricing strategy where the national companies have fared better in the minds of the customers due to their fresh food and also catering to the fact that both of them have similar food items and are advantageous to one another. 4.2 Non-price strategies used by Mc Donald’s and Hungry Jacks are similar but distinct Product –McDonald’s has a large number of veg and non-veg Ala carte and combo items whereas Hungry jacks has all the items in addition to the breakfast menu and vegan food items menu. Promotion –The promotion of McDonald’s is done on a global basis with prominent adherence to both the offline and online mode in terms of their promotional strategy (Goodman & Robison, 2013). The overall strategy of promotion is greater in terms of McDonald’s due to their online and offline presence and Hungry Tides has limited access to it as it is a national based brand. Place –The place of service is worldwide in case of McDonald’s whereas it is national in the case of Hungry Tides 4.3 opportunities that can be used by McDonald’s It can manufacture some vegan items to cater to the vegan population and give tough competition to Hungry Jack The regional flavors and items can be included to give the natives a taste of their own culture in an American cuisine. Organic food items can be included in the overall cuisine of the time and also help to have the customers a better health and sustainability. The regional population customer base can be taken away from Hungry Tides when fed with the right kind of food and promotional strategies. 5.0 Conclusion In the above study, it can be concluded that both the organizations namely McDonalds and Hungry jacks have developed its strong business impression on the customers mind, however, in case of analyzing the strong market structure and growth strategy of the company,
9ECONOMICS AND FINANCE FOR BUSINESS McDonalds has performed pretty well. In the market structure it has been identified that with large geographic area, McDonalds serves large number of customers in the global market. growth trend of both the organizations have been examined in this study, where it has been identified that from the year 2007 McDonalds is maintaining its constant growth, however due to smaller customer base and lack of diversified products, slower growth has been shown in Hungry jacks. Analyzing the pricing strategy of both the organizations, it has been identified that the product range of Hungry Jacks is little high compared to the price of McDonalds. Both the organizations aim to provide standard quality of food in the lower ranges, however, due to the pricing strategy, McDonalds has got the higher level of appreciation from the market. On the other hand, non-pricing strategies of both the organizations have been highlighted through the study. In this comparison, it has been identified that in case of products McDonalds provides non-veg and veg products. Similarly Hungry also provides non-veg and veg foods. The major dissimilarity is hungry Jacks provide vegan, which is not available in McDonalds. Comparing the geographic area, McDonalds is a global brand where Hungry jacks is the nationalized brand. It has been identified that Hungry Jacks provide the breakfast option which is not available in McDonalds. However, depending on the entire comparison, it has been identified that McDonalds is in far better position than Hungry jacks in the market and due to its strong market structure and growth strategies, it is being able to maintain monopoly structure in the market.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
10ECONOMICS AND FINANCE FOR BUSINESS 6.0 Reference list Goodman, D., & Robison, R. (2013).The new rich in Asia: Mobile phones, McDonald's and middle class revolution. Routledge. Grant, R. M. (2016).Contemporary strategy analysis: Text and cases edition. John Wiley & Sons. Heidari, A., Aslani, A., Hajinezhad, A., & Tayyar, S. H. (2017). Strategic Analysis of Iran's Energy System.Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment,37(1), 56-79. Hungryjacks.com.au (2018). Available at:https://www.hungryjacks.com.au/home[Accessed on 14 Oct, 2018] Johnston, R. E., & Bate, J. D. (2013).The power of strategy innovation: a new way of linking creativity and strategic planning to discover great business opportunities. AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn. Jones,S.C.,Gregory,P.,&Kervin,L.(2012).Brandedfoodreferencesinchildren's magazines:‘advertisements’ are the tip of the iceberg.Pediatric obesity,7(3), 220-229. Kuan,J.(2018,July).StrategicAnalysisofNonprofitProduction.InAcademyofManagement Proceedings(Vol. 2018, No. 1, p. 17926). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management. Kumar, D. (2016).Enterprise growth strategy: vision, planning and execution. Routledge. Martinsons, M. G. (2016). Research of information systems: from parochial to international, towards global or glocal?.Information Systems Journal,26(1), 3-19. Mcdonalds.com (2018). Available at:https://www.mcdonalds.com/us/en-us.html[Accessed on 14 Oct, 2018] Morley, B., Scully, M., Niven, P., Baur, L. A., Crawford, D., Flood, V., ... & NaSSDA Study Team. (2012). Prevalenceand socio-demographicdistributionofeating,physical activityand sedentary behaviours among Australian adolescents.Health Promotion Journal of Australia,23(3), 213- 218. Moutinho,L.,&Phillips,P.(2018).Strategicanalysis.InContemporaryIssuesinStrategic Management(pp. 46-79). Routledge. Nagle, T. T., & Müller, G. (2017).The strategy and tactics of pricing: A guide to growing more profitably. Routledge. Phillipov, M. (2013). Resisting health: Extreme food and the culinary abject.Critical Studies in Media Communication,30(5), 377-390. Rumelt, R. P. (2012). Good strategy/bad strategy: The differenceand why it matters.Strategic Direction,28(8). Schuster, S. (2017). Making the rational for a simplification process for the car rental industry: A strategic analysis for the Case of Hertz in the United States of America.
11ECONOMICS AND FINANCE FOR BUSINESS Smh.com.au (2018). Available at: https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/are-the-profits-better- at-hungry-jacks-20170217-gufigw.html [Accessed on 14 Oct, 2018] Strizhakova, Y., & Coulter, R. A. (2015). Drivers of local relative to global brand purchases: A contingency approach.Journal of International Marketing,23(1), 1-22. Tan, Y., & Carrillo, J. E. (2017). Strategic analysis of the agency model for digital goods.Production and Operations Management,26(4), 724-741. Tassey, G. (2012). Beyond the business cycle: The need for a technology-based growth strategy.Science and Public Policy,40(3), 293-315.