Meeting Evaluation Report

This document provides a comprehensive report on meeting evaluation, highlighting the significance of effective meetings for organizational success. It details various criteria for assessing meetings, such as preparation, punctuality, participant engagement, and speaker effectiveness. The report includes a checklist to evaluate different aspects of a meeting and emphasizes the need for continuous improvement. Additionally, it provides references for further study on meeting evaluation.

Meeting evaluation
The effectiveness of successful organization have been determine by the successful meeting
between member and officers of organization. The effective meeting provide platform to
discussion for the issues and probable source to eliminate those problems. Also meeting allow
officer to execute responsibility and progress report of project.
After completing successful meeting, it is require to evaluate effectively, it is evaluation of how
fellow officer take responsibly of particular task and amount of involvement for the project of
organization. We also assume that they are participate in meeting and provide some opinion. To
develop meeting, the manager have to open for suggestion and criticisms. Also allow to execute
the officer feeling and perception for project. The effective meeting does not need to defend
problem of officer but it is more important to express your points and views for project. Also
allow participant to express their views.
After discussion and collect the different opinions from participant or officers, it is require to
summarise the view point of meeting and evaluation about how the meeting went. There are
various thought like, is meeting improve from past experience? Is meeting gone smoothly? Did
participate or officers stay focus about the discussion? Did anything missing during meeting?
Did meeting goes as effectively? To evaluate meeting, there are many criteria which help for
evaluation effectiveness of meeting. It is necessary to evaluate meeting and take action for
improvement or make effective.
1 | P a g e

The meeting evaluation criteria as following:
Criteria Meeting Evaluation
Is that well prepare meeting
for discuss about topic? Excellent Very good Good Average Need
improvement
Is meeting start at defined
time? Excellent Very good Good Average Need
improvement
Are participants focus on
discussion topic? Excellent Very good Good Average Need
improvement
Is Participant provide view
during meeting? Excellent Very good Good Average Need
improvement
Is conference room suitable
to conduct meeting? Excellent Very good Good Average Need
improvement
Is speaker encourage to
each participant? Excellent Very good Good Average Need
improvement
Are the member know
about time and date of
meeting?
Excellent Very good Good Average Need
improvement
Sufficient Time spend of
each topic discussion Excellent Very good Good Average Need
improvement
Is Speaker ready to provide
report? Excellent Very good Good Average Need
improvement
* Mark above criteria after conduct meeting for evaluation and take action for effective meeting.
2 | P a g e

References
Ends, O. (2017). Meeting Evaluation: Don’t Make the Same Mistakes Twice. Tomlaforce.com.
Retrieved 17 September 2017, from http://tomlaforce.com/evaluate-your-meetings/
LibGuides: Evaluation based on scientific publishing: Evaluating conferences. (2017).
Libguides.oulu.fi. Retrieved 17 September 2017, from
http://libguides.oulu.fi/evaluatingpublications/conferences
3 | P a g e