The Process of Conducting Discovery

Added on - 30 Sep 2019

  • 10


  • 4565


  • 105


  • 0


Showing pages 1 to 3 of 10 pages
MEMORANDUMTO:LWR LLMC StudentsFROM:Senior Partner Gail GreeneRE:Dr. Anna Liu:Brand v. Refresh Medical Spa, File No. 5928, PossibleSummary Judgment MotionDATE:October 10, 2016General Information about the Case and General AssignmentWe represent Dr. Anna Liu in the case ofBrand v. Refresh Medical Spa.Nicolette Brand filed a personal injury complaint against Refresh Medical Spa, Dr.Golden, Dr. Liu (our client), and other individuals. She alleges that a tracheotomy thatwas performed on her was not necessary and was improperly completed, resulting inpermanent scarring on her neck.Our law firm, Greene & Jin, has answered the complaint on behalf of Dr. Liu, andwe are in the process of conducting discovery. Discovery consists of sending outdocument requests, form interrogatories, and special interrogatories to the opposingparty. Discovery also may involve taking deposition testimony and acceptingdeclarations. I have included some of the discovery that has been completed so far toprovide you with the basic facts.Our firm is considering filing a summary judgment motion against Ms. Brand inorder to have Dr. Liu dismissed as a defendant. A summary judgment is a final decisionby a judge that resolves a lawsuit in favor of one of the parties. The motion is made afterdiscovery is completed but before the case goes to trial. The summary judgment motioncan only be made if the moving party does not dispute the facts as stated by the opposingparty or posits that the facts do not matter because the issue can be decided as a matter oflaw. Based on our understanding of the law, we think that Dr. Liu is immune fromliability under the California Good Samaritan statutes.In order to be successful on the motion, we would need to argue that, based on theundisputed factual evidence, the fact finder could only decide the case one way.I wantyou to research the law and then prepare a Memorandum of Points and Authorities(P’s & A’s) that would accompany a summary judgment motion. The P’s & A’s willargue that Dr. Liu is immune from liability under the Good Samaritan statutes.Specific Assignments(Research, Research Log & List, Outline, and P’s & A’s)First, I want you to research how the Good Samaritan statutes apply to physicians like Dr.Liu. I want you to work off my Research Plan, and prepare a Research Log (including aResearch List of Primary Authority and a description of all the steps you took to finalizethat list), and later an Outline of your analysis. I want to see the List, Log, and Outlinebefore you begin writing your P’s & A’s.1
To recap, I will want you to complete the following in the remaining few weeks:Review the documents provided to you and, using my Research Plan,identifyanissuestatement, jurisdiction identification,andTARPterms for the research.Conduct yourResearchusing the steps laid out in the Research Plan below.As you research, keep aResearch Logof the sources you consulted, the steps you tookto research, and the statutes and cases that you found. Be over-inclusive. If you are notsure whether you will end up using the statute or case, you should nevertheless include it.If you run into dead-ends, include that information as well. The steps in your researchshould match the numbers of the steps in the Plan.As you research, take notes of other references (secondary authorities such asencyclopedias, ALR articles, keynote numbers, and primary authorities such as statutesand cases. Include this information in your Log. This is the “KFC” notes.At the end of the Log write a short paragraph telling me whether your research planworked or not.Finally, prepare aResearch Listthat identifies all the cases and statutes you found thatyou think would be needed to argue this motion. As noted above, be over inclusive atthis point.Email to me your List and Log (including paragraph of reflection) byTuesday, October 18, by 10:00 p.m. at the Research List is approved, you will prepare anOutlineof your P’s and A’s(and aCase-Synthesis Chart–recommended but not required).Once your Outline is approved, you will prepare theMemorandum of Points &Authoritiesin support of the summary judgment motion.You are welcome toconferencewith me on your draft before you turn it in.2
Specific Information on the Plan, List, and LogResearch Plan and Research ItselfI will provide you with the Research Plan needed for comprehensive research. Irecommend you also look through Nedzel chapters 5-6 and your class notes onresearching, including all handouts. I strongly recommend reviewing the LRC videos.Read the Deposition transcript and Declaration and get familiar with the facts and detailsof the case.1.Develop an initialissue statementto focus your research.2.Identify thejurisdiction.3.TARP– generate a list of relevant search terms.Follow theResearch Plandesigned to locate the mandatory authority you will need.Research PlanFirst, consult secondary sourcesfor background information and to access citations.Remember that you can execute searches either by typing in a global search, limiting thejurisdiction to California, and then selecting resource options from the menu on the left.Or you can first select the resource, then search, then filter by jurisdiction (and otherfilters). Either route is fine with me, but be sure to indicate in your Log how yousearched. List the steps. Below are reminders on how to access the information, using aGlobal Type Search.4.EncyclopediasChoose one service in which to conduct this research. If researching on Westlaw, typeyour search term in the search box and use the drop-down menu to select the correctjurisdiction for a California case. When the results appear, choose “Secondary Sources”from the left side of the screen. Review the possibilities for filtering your secondarysource results on the left side of the screen. Select California again as your jurisdiction.Look for a California encyclopedia (either Cal. Jur or Witkin) under “Publication Name,”select it, and click “Apply Filters.” [As mentioned above, you could also go straight tothe Encyclopedia by pre-filtering: type the name of the source in the search box or byselecting a type of source to begin with.]Once you have read and taken notes fromthe first encyclopedia, then look up and review the second encyclopedia.If searching on Lexis Advance, type your search term in the main search box and use thedrop-down filters to select the correct jurisdiction for a California case. Then click“Search.” When the results appear, select “Secondary Materials” on the left side of yourresults screen. Scroll to the Category section to find a reference to a Californiaencyclopedia. Select the appropriate category, and review the results for relevantmaterial. [Here too you could also search by source.]3
You’re reading a preview

To View Complete Document

Become a Desklib Library Member.
Subscribe to our plans

Unlock This Document