Literature Review on Mental Health in Nursing

Mental Health
Nursing -Literature
review

Answer 1
This review objective is to gather the information and understanding of the existing
research article related to the systematic review of the community based obesity prevention
interventions between adolescents and to evaluate its outcomes in mental health well-being.
Answer 2
This research general was registered under the BMJ open 2015; 5:e006586. Soi: 10.
1136/bmjopen-2014 006586. this article was received in 11 September 2014, then revised in 6 of
November 2014, then finally accepted 9 December 2014.
Answer 3
For this review article there are the various factors which consider under the inclusion
and exclusion criteria. Such as the under the inclusion criteria, community based intervention is
considered, along with target group. There they have included the different health care centres
for study and review such as community health care centres, school and cities health care
centres. Other inclusion criteria was the obesity prevention intervention, primary research,
community based, targeted adolescent population, follow-up and measurement of mental health
report. Exclusion criteria in this health care review was the single individual, clinical settings,
obesity treatment, management intervention, focus on particular risk, as it was focus about the
group and community overweight prevention and intervention so that's why they have excluded
the specific management of the obesity.
Answer 3
In this report of review different type of study were included such as the primary and
secondary out come measurement, PRISMA methodology in order to evaluate the evidence
grading and recommendation effectively. Along with the (GRADE) as it aid to conduct the
effective study with qualitative results. Data extraction and data synthesis is used in order to
effectively conduct all inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Answer 5
This review article was developed and sourced with the aid of some database such as
from the CINAHL, Global health, and health source, PsycINFO, nursing, academic edition,

MIDLINE. So all these databases was accesses through EBSCO host along with the guidelines
of PRISMA in order to conduct effective search process.
Answer 6
search terms of this review article was good and best in context to their review project
and objective. Because all implemented search term are good and qualitative in themselves
because it provide the specific steps, techniques and framework of the research along with this it
help to gather the relevant and updated information. Then additionally similar search was done
within the Cochrane Database in order to scree the articles for eligibility, relevancy. Every
search terms and techniques was suitable for this review article because these are the best
database of research and study aid to get the relevant information, in prospect to the specific
review objectives. Such as in context to this article all these research tool helped in the study and
analysis of the obesity overweight prevention plans, process and overweight management
intervention with evidence of affectivity.
Answer 7
Study limit in this report was that they can not conduct the meta analysis due to various
type of mental health measurements and huge component of the intervention, which create the
difficulties in the outcome follow-up. Such as they have conducted the successful study on
weight reduction outcome along with the ensuring that intervention not effecting the mental
health in negative terms. But mental health report was under the process and not reported
specifically.
Answer 8
PRISMA Flow in context to this report is describing the brief explanation of their
inclusion and exclusion criteria. They have explained in that report that why they have selected
that specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Such as they have yield 621 abstracts with the aid
of EBSCO host and 140 articles through Cochrane database then they were screened for
inclusion and exclusion, they have selected the 46 articles in order to examine and evaluate for
the eligibility, then after the eligibility analysis 39 article was removed with the some reasons
such as 14 article not included the mental health measures, 15 articles did not include population
representative adolescents. 7 articles are removed due to absence of the intervention design, 2