This document provides a review and feedback on different messages, including Justin Trudeau's Christmas message, media coverage distortions, and Sean Hannity's message. It highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each message and provides suggestions for improvement. The document also includes references for further reading.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: MESSAGE REVIEW AND FEEDBACK MESSAGE REVIEW AND FEEDBACK Name of the University Name of the Student Author Note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1MESSAGE REVIEW AND FEEDBACK Justin Trudeau Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's Christmas message highlightsdiversity and Canadians' reputation for being helpful, warm, compassionate and generous year round, and not just during the holidays. In his statement released Sunday, a day before Christmas Day, Trudeau also encouraged Canadians to build on the country's 150th birthday celebrations in 2017 by continuing to make a difference in 2018. "In 2017, people across Canada gave us much reason to be proud, and showed us the strength in our diversity. Canadians are neighbours helping neighbours, sharing warmth, compassion, and generosity — not just at Christmas, but year round. "As the 150thanniversary of Confederation draws to a close, all of us have a role to play in shaping our world for the better," the Liberal leader said. "In the new year, and throughout the years to come, let's commit to making a difference. Whether by lending a hand to a neighbour, or volunteering for a cause we believe in, let's give generously, and live out the values that bring us together." Let's also reach out and listen — to those next door, across the aisle, and at the dinner table," his message said."Building a better world starts where we work and live, in our communities, and at home." "During the holidays, I also ask you take a moment to remember our brave service women and men, and their families. They make extraordinary sacrifices to keep us safe." 1.High level review The message is good in terms of how the prime minister have been very kind in the way he is putting forward his words. However, there is a lack of charismatic confidence in the way he is providing the message. He is talking about diversity and needed to provide few other examples of inter-religious cooperation. He is very formal in his tone. This is quite alright in some of the cases, however, at times it gets too much personal. The message should have been from the administration and government of Canada to its citizens. However, Trudeau makes it more formal.
2MESSAGE REVIEW AND FEEDBACK Bad News Two destructive impulses distort media coverage of far too many major – and minor – events. And both of these instincts were on powerful display in the recent distortions involving a non- violent, Lincoln Memorial exchange between pro-life, Catholic high school boys from Covington, Kentucky and activists representing “Indigenous Peoples” and “Black Israelites.” First, reporters tend to blame conservatives for anything that goes wrong, even when there’s scant evidence to back them up. Second, the media almost always exaggerate anything that does goes wrong. Any problem — from the environment, to the economy, to the political system to schools and even foreign relations — automatically becomes a catastrophe. The idea is that the public will pay more attention if you can make them worried or scared: the news business becomes the bad news business, promoting an unduly pessimistic view of our country and the world. 2.High-level review The problem that can be seen in the message is its difficulty in dissemination of the message. The message uses a lot of very difficult words. In essence, the message needs to be read more than once to get a proper idea of the subject of the message. The message also at times uses a lot of aggressive opinions against the workings of the news media. The message need to be simplified in order to provide a better perspective.
3MESSAGE REVIEW AND FEEDBACK Sean Hannity “I'm not as concerned as some other conservatives if the president signs the bill, but there are a couple of ifs,” Hannity told viewers, including his most important one in the White House. “Step one: The president decides he wants to sign the compromise, which would guarantee the $1.375 billion down payment for the wall, OK, that money can be used immediately.” “Now if he takes step two, which is the president utilizing money he’s identified, some $900 million for additional construction, that is already available for the administration's discretion,” he continued. “That would be about $2.3 billion, but the important third step needs to happen simultaneously.” “And that would be the president would need to declare a national emergency,” Hannity concluded. “This is the time. That is a necessity. And the president, I think I know him very well, telegraphed that very thing just today.” 3.High level review The message is very difficult to decipher. The person providing the message uses a neutral position for the message. However, there is no conclusion that is provided in regards to the message. The person should make his stand clear and make the message more effective and important. It becomes important that he structures the message in a proper way and concussively. Moreover, at the end of the message the person provides a view that is much confusing as he states that the president has made a decision for which he gives very less evidence.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4MESSAGE REVIEW AND FEEDBACK 4.Copy Edit Bad News -There are two destructive elements that distort the coverage of media and many events that can either be major or minor. -Firstly, reporters tend to blame conservatives for anything that goes wrong, even when there’s scant evidence to back them up. Secondly, the media almost always exaggerate anything that does goes wrong. -Hence, the news business becomes the bad news business, promoting an unduly pessimistic view of our country and the world. 5.Detailed review Sean Hannity Thismessagerequiresclearevidencebaseddevelopmentofunderstanding.Aspointed previously the message my Sean Hannity is suffering from the lack of clarity. It is important to consider that the information being provided is about the president of the United States and need to be given in a more detailed and formal fashion. Message is for the audiences and should be clear and concise. Sean Hannity needs to make his point clearer by providing the estimated cost of building the wall and provide the same in a systematic relatable fashion. He definitely needs to be more neutral as at the end he provides quite a lot of biasness towards the decision of Donald trump. The message need to be given in a fashion that the audiences have no problem in understanding the standpoint of the speaker.
5MESSAGE REVIEW AND FEEDBACK 6.References CBC. (2019).'Commit to making a difference,' Trudeau urges Canadians in his Christmas message | CBC News. [online] Available at: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/trudeau-christmas- holiday-message-1.4464250 The Daily Beast. (2019).Trump’s About to Do Exactly What Hannity Wants Him to Do. [online] Availableat:https://www.thedailybeast.com/with-national-emergency-trump-will-do-exactly- what-hannity-wants-him-to-do [Accessed 15 Feb. 2019].