Methods of Educational Research

This research paper discusses the issues of teacher retention in Nevada schools and explores the reasons why teachers leave the profession. It examines the challenges faced by teachers and provides recommendations for improving teacher retention. The research methodology includes qualitative interviews, observations, and literature reviews. The paper also highlights the importance of factors such as teacher salaries, preparation, coaching, and teaching conditions in retaining teachers. The recommendations focus on creating competitive and equitable remuneration packages, improving teacher preparation and induction programs, and enhancing teaching conditions in schools.

Methods of educational research
Name
Institution
Professor
Course
Date

Topic title: Teachers retention in Nevada
Purpose
This research paper aimed at discussing the issues regarding teacher retention in Nevada schools.
The research paper identified the problems facing teacher’s commitment in carrying out their
teaching practices and tasks schools over a long period of time. (Aragon 2016).In the research,
various challenges were identified which served as the main issues prompting teachers to feel
uncomfortable in the schools. This issue made them leave thus making the schools to have a
shortage of teachers. In the research, various recommendations for teacher’s retention were
discussed.
Research questions
1. What are the key issues making teachers to leave the teaching profession in Nevada
Schools?
2. How many teachers left and how many are retained in the schools
3. What the problems facing teacher's retention
4. What are the probable solutions?
Hypothesis
The aim of the research was based on the following hypothesis;
The underlying reasons for teachers that prompted to leave the teaching profession
The procedure used by the teacher in making the decision to leave the profession.
Whether there existed any trigger points which made the teachers not be retained in the schools
and made them leave.

Various factors or possible solution which could have otherwise encouraged them to retain their
ability in the teaching profession.
Methodology
A qualitative approach through the use of telephone and face-to-face interview techniques was
utilized. The methodology aimed at exploring the reason that teachers leave the profession hence
discussing key potential solutions for retainment of teachers in Nevada schools (Boser 2014).
The research involved pilot phases that explored emerging findings and focus groups for full
qualitative analysis. The main participants for the analysis were formal teachers.
The aim of the methodology was to conduct 20 qualitative interviews with former teachers
across various fields or subjects distinct schools in Nevada. The pilot study was utilized to test
the semi-structured topic guide and also the needed methodological approach which included
telephone and physical interviews sessions.
The research methodology also included use of observations, articles, government, and the
internet
Background
All things considered, a discourse of retention approaches is extremely straightforward in light
of the fact that, over the United States and inside Nevada, a couple of uncommon endeavors have
been made to retain teachers of color (Bureau 2011). In the meantime, endeavors to help the
retainment of educators in schools with high rates of ELL students, or situated in high-neediness
territories, can support the retainment of instructors by prudence. This is in case of the manner
that such a significant number of teachers of color instruct in such schools. For instance, in 2015
the Nevada State Legislature passed two bills, SB 405, "Zoom Schools Act," and SB 432,

"Triumph Schools Act." (Bureau 2011).Both acts give (among other help) money-related
motivators for enlistment and retaining of teachers in low-performing schools in Nevada and
Washoe provinces. This gave other explicit criteria, for example, having extensive populaces of
ELLs in the students body (Zoom Schools) or being situated in one of the 20 least fortunate
postal districts in the state (Victory Schools). There are exacting breaking points in the
enactment topping the joined aggregate of the financing for a Zoom or Victory school that can be
utilized for expert advancement, enrollment and maintenance pay, and family commitment to 2
percent of that school's spending limit. Conversely, on the grounds that the biennial spending
plan for each demonstration is $25 million, the assessed aggregate for enlistment and retainment.
Literature review
According to the article Burkett (2011) research finds that people are bound to progress towards
becoming instructors when educator pay rates are aggressive with those of other occupations.
Salaries additionally impact on teacher's retention: Both starting and veteran teachers are bound
to leave their career when they work in schools with lower compensation. This when their pay
rates are low in respect to elective pay openings, particularly in high demand fields like both
mathematics and science. Teachers' pay rates, in any case, have been declining since the 1990s
and now add up to just about 70% of the pay rates of other school taught specialists.
Readiness—According to the article Grissom (2012), it shows that teacher's attrition and
retention is surprisingly high for the individuals who need good preparation for teaching. Several
examinations have discovered that educators who get minimal academic training are a few times
bound to leave teaching after their first year than instructors who had acquire an extensive
training. A key issue, nonetheless, is the means by which applicants can bear the cost of

satisfactory planning—particularly when they may have needed get ready to enter a profession
that has limited opportunities than of what others had.
Tutoring and Induction—Well-structured coaching programs improve retention standards for
new educators, their attitudes, sentiments of viability, and instructional skills. The ability to
progress incorporate having a guide instructor in a similar branch of knowledge, basic scheduled
time with educators in a similar subject, and normally planned joint effort with different
instructors. Starting educators' training is upgraded further when their tutors likewise get formal
training and are discharged from their very own portion classroom obligations to give
coordinated perception and instructing in class, so they can exhibit viable strategies and help new
instructors tackle issues of practice. Less training of teachers can lower the retainment ability of
Nevada schools
Teaching Conditions—Surveys of educators have long demonstrated that instructing conditions
assume a noteworthy job in instructors' choices to change schools or leave the calling. The
moderately poor instructing conditions in some high-neediness schools are a noteworthy
motivation behind why instructors in these schools are more than twice as liable to leave because
of disappointment as those in low-destitution schools. Beyond assets, educators' arrangements to
remain in teaching and their purposes behind really having left are emphatically connected with
how they feel about authoritative help, collegial chances, and instructor contribution to basic
leadership. At the point when these components are available, retaining educators is a lot simpler
(Dee, & Goldhaber, 2017). Of educators who left in the year after 2012, just 13% said the most
significant factor for their flight was retirement. Fifty-five percent announced regions of
disappointment as significant explanations behind leaving. These range from showing
conditions, for example, class sizes and pay rates, to despondency with regulatory practices, (for

example, absence of help, study hall self-sufficiency, or contribution on choices) to approach
issues, for example, the impacts of testing and responsibility (Grisom 2012). Responsibility
weights concentrated on test arrangement and prompting sanctions included the most as often as
possible referred to a zone of disappointment, recorded by 25% of instructors who left
Strategy Recommendations
Numerous strategy choices can be considered to assuage instructor shortages and retention.
These are for the most part pointed either at expanding the attractions and interests to teaching or
bringing down the principles to turn into an educator. Momentary arrangements may incidentally
control the dread of void class room halls, however, they can frequently intensify the issue as
time goes on. For instance, if educators are employed without having been completely trained,
there will be an extremely lower turnover rates regarding the schools achievement. Long term
arrangements concentrating on enlistment and retain can ease deficiencies of teachers, while
likewise focusing on student learning prioritization and a strong teacher workforce (Lin, EShi,
Wang, Zhang, & Hui, 2012). To achieve this, the ongoing research recommends that policies
enacted in Nevada should 1. Make competitive and equitable remuneration packages which
enable educators to make a good living over a wide range of community networks. • Leverage
increased competitive and equitable pay rates by giving locale motivating forces to raise
instructor pay rates, expanding Nevada pay plans, or improving direct resources to students they
teach such as lower poverty, ensure English language learning and foster cares among the youths
(Martin, & Mulvihill, 2016). • Create various incentives that make living as an instructor
increasingly reasonable by offering other money-related motivators, including: mortgage
guarantees to teachers, down payments, or other housing support, in return for service
commitments of teachers hence retaining them; children care supports; and chances to keep

educating and tutoring after retirement, while keeping up retirement benefits (Molnar, et al
2014).cording to the articles, the supply of qualified instructors into high-need fields and areas
through focused preparing appropriations and high-retention pathways is significant. It is evident
that schools in Nevada require teachers who will spend more time in teaching careers on the
shortage fields like math, science, special education and also bilingual education. Expanding
access to strong teacher planning can build the pipeline of qualified, submitted and committed
educators to high-needed school positions. This improves the schools retainment abilities.
According to the article, Nevada schools administration should offer forgivable loans and service
scholarships in order to increase teacher’s retention (Smalley & Smith, 2017). The government
ought to keep up a generous, supported program of administration grants that spread preparing
costs in the high-quality undergrad or graduate arrangement programs for the individuals who
will educate in a high need field or area for at any rate four years. The national government and
states can expand the supply of instructors willing to educate in urban and country zones by
enrolling and supporting secondary school understudies and other network individuals from
those regions. • Establish instructor residency models in areas with difficult housing conditions
(Moore 2012).
According to Lavigne & Bozack (2015), the Nevada schools administrations can improve
teacher's retention especially in challenging school conditions, through improved tutoring,
acceptance, working conditions, and profession advancement. In the event that an educator gets
coaching, joint effort, and additional assets, and is a piece of a solid instructor arrange, the first-
year turnover is cut by the greater part (from 41% to 18%).42 But only 3% of starting instructors
had such a complete arrangement of backings in 2012. furthermore, school working conditions—
including access to assets, regulatory help, collegial chances, instructor contribution to basic

leadership, and weight identified with responsibility measures—emphatically impact instructors'
decisions to keep educating in their schools. • Develop strong generally accessible tutoring and
enlistment programs. With government or state coordinating gifts, regions can bolster each new
educator utilizing acceptance methodologies that work: • Create profitable school conditions.
States and areas can designate assets explicitly to improve training conditions in difficult-to-staff
schools (Stohlmann, Moore, & Roehrig, 2012). These assets can diminish class sizes, buy truly
necessary materials and supplies, and give time to proficient advancement and joint instructor
arranging. • Strengthen important preparing programs. Government and state offices can offer to
give subsidizing and specialized help for making and extending top-notch chief preparing
programs that underscore compelling authority aptitudes. The teachers board can also Build up a
national instructor supply program that can encourage getting and retaining educators in the
spots they are required through the span of their professions (Winters, & Cowen, 2013). The
government can give work advertise information and examinations for bureaucratic, state, and
neighborhood arranging. • Support for educator versatility. States can bolster basic authorizing
tests and interstate understandings about teachers qualification coursework to encourage
increasingly retainment, communication and commitment • Support annuity convenience. An
open/private organization among states and benefits suppliers can help make an arrangement of
annuity transportability across Nevada r states, in order to ensure commitment accomplishments
among the staff.
Conclusion
Teacher’s shortage levels give a chance to Nevada to adopt a long term strategy to a thorough
and efficient arrangement of answers for fabricating a solid teaching profession (Sutcher,
Darling-Hammond, & Carver-Thomas, 2016). Despite the fact that these recommendations have

a sticker price, they could at last spare definitely more than they would cost. The reserve funds
would incorporate more than $8 billion presently squandered every year on substitution costs as
a result of high instructor turnover, in addition to a significant part of the cost of evaluation
maintenance, summer schools, and therapeutic projects required on the grounds that an excessive
number of youngsters are inadequately educated. It should prevent and eliminate teacher
shortages so that it can ensure teacher retention and commitment in order for learning to acquire
competently and continues teaching for the betterment of the entire society. Nevada schools
board of management should ensure that they strengthen their orientation levels in order to
identify the interest and expectations of teachers who are recruited in the schools.by
understanding the expectations of the teachers in the career and the schools, will be able to
identify measures which will help fulfil the teacher’s expectations. This will improve their ability
to retain teachers.

References
Aragon, S. (2016). Teacher Shortages: What We Know. Teacher Shortage Series. Education
Commission of the States.2nd edition.Cambridge university.Handbook
Boser, U. (2014). Teacher Diversity Revisited: A New State-by-State Analysis. Center for
American Progress.3rd edition.Washington DC
Bureau, N. L. C. (2011). Nevada education data book. Retrieved from Nevada Legislature
website: http://www.leg state. nv.
us/Division/Research/Publications/EdDataBook/2011/2011EDB. pdf.
Burkett, E. I. (2011). A case study of issues concerning professional development for rural
instrumental music teachers. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 21(1), 51-64.
Dee, T. S., & Goldhaber, D. (2017). Understanding and addressing teacher shortages in the
United States. The Hamilton Project.2nd edition Cambridge university.
Grissom, J. A. (2012). Revisiting the impact of participative decision making on public
employee retention: The moderating influence of effective managers. The American
Review of Public Administration, 42(4), 400-418.

Lavigne, A. L., & Bozack, A. R. (2015). Successes and struggles of teaching: Perspectives of
beginning, mid-career, and veteran teachers. Journal of Teaching Effectiveness and
Student Achievement, 2(2), 68.
Lin, E., Shi, Q., Wang, J., Zhang, S., & Hui, L. (2012). Initial motivations for teaching:
Comparison between preservice teachers in the United States and China. Asia-Pacific
Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 227-248.
Martin, L. E., & Mulvihill, T. M. (2016). Voices in Education: Teacher Shortage: Myth or
Reality?. The Teacher Educator, 51(3), 175-184.
Molnar, A., Huerta, L., Rice, J. K., Shafer, S. R., Barbour, M. K., Miron, G., ... & Horvitz, B.
(2014). Virtual schools in the US 2014: Politics, performance, policy, and research
evidence.3rd edition,Havard university
Moore, C. M. (2012). The role of school environment in teacher dissatisfaction among US public school
teachers. Sage Open, 2(1), 2158244012438888.American press
Smalley, S. W., & Smith, A. R. (2017). Professional development needs of mid-career
agriculture teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 58(4), 282.
Stohlmann, M., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated
STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-
PEER), 2(1), 4.
Sutcher, L., Darling-Hammond, L., & Carver-Thomas, D. (2016). A coming crisis in teaching?
Teacher supply, demand, and shortages in the US. Learning Policy Institute.3rd
edition.Cambridge university

Winters, M. A., & Cowen, J. M. (2013). Would a value‐added system of retention improve the
distribution of teacher quality? A Simulation of Alternative Policies. Journal of Policy
Analysis and Management, 32(3), 634-654.