Limited-time offer! Save up to 50% Off | Solutions starting at $6 each  

Mighty Tech Company’s Leadership and Teamwork Essay

Added on - 25 Jan 2022

Trusted by 2+ million users,
1000+ happy students everyday
Showing pages 1 to 2 of 4 pages
Mighty Tech Company’s Leadership and
Teamwork Essay
Groups and Teams
Members of groups and teams need to work together all the time for them to achieve their
goals. Coordination is vital for any group carrying out a common task because failure to
coordinate leads to confusion. Team leaders should be able to steer groups effectively towards
achieving intended goals. In the case of Mighty tech, the group was unable to achieve its goals
in a timely manner because its members lacked coordination.
For instance, Ben and Beatrice disagreed on the approach to follow in order to complete the job
in time (Wong 2009, p. 98). Beatrice felt that they needed to follow every detail carefully in order
to complete the job in a professional manner hence defending her professional integrity. On the
other hand, Ben felt that they should take an approach aimed at completing the task in time for
his company to win the deal.
Personal interests affected the performance of this group hence costing the ABCIB the deal to
fund the intended merger. Ben wanted to complete the task regardless of its accuracy so that
his employer can have the deal. As a result, Ben knew that he was going to have enormous
bonuses if the task yielded fruits (Slack and Parent 2005, p. 50). On the other hand, Beatrice
wanted to carry out her job in accordance with the set principles of accounting. She wanted to
ensure that the reputation of her employer remained unquestioned. If Bryce had made
everything clear to all team members, things could be easier as they could have focused on
completing the task in favor of ABCIB.
Team Effective Model (Input, throughput & Output)
The team effectiveness model gives details on stakeholders’ contribution to the accomplishment
of set tasks. For instance, there is the input which comprises of skills brought in by employees.
For instance, in the case of Mighty tech workers provided professional skills in auditing the firm.
There was diversity inexperience, and this is the reason why each individual in the auditing
team was allocated tasks in their areas of expertise (Romer and Wolfers 2009, p. 72). For
instance, Ben and Beatrice were expected to audit Mighty tech’s accounting books to come up
with its financial position. Bryce and Bill were supposed to lead the two teams in order to
achieve those tasks in time. This means that they were to provide leadership skills in the team.
The organizational and group processes comprise the throughput. These processes provide a
clear guide on what the team needs to do. For instance, performance standards are set by the
company for the team. In this case, ABCIB had set standards to be followed by the audit team
in ensuring that they get the real value of Mighty tech (Martin and Fellenw 2010, p. 60).
Facilitation of the audit process also is constituted in the throughput since it is the organization
that caters to the needs of the audit team. On the other hand, the team agrees on the approach
or strategy to use, and their vision and all these factors constitute the throughput.
The output consists of task deliverables and innovative solutions achieved by the team. For this
case, the output was supposed to be audit reports to be used by the ABCIB to guide on how
much they have to use to finance the merger.
Motivation is noteworthy because it instills morale in people to work more. Organizations that
have motivational packages for their workers enjoy better results than those that do not have. In
fact, happy workers end up directing all their focus towards achieving organizational goals. This
translates to increased profitability and enhanced employee-management relations. In this case,
the team failed to achieve its set goals because only one part was being motivated.
ABCIB had promised its workers generous bonuses if the deal was to be successful. This is the
reason why Ben was ready to use any approach to ensure that the task is complete (Humphrey
2007, p. 105). On the other hand, Beatrice was working for her company and expected nothing
more than her normal salary. This is the reason why she did not care about how much time she
might take to complete and approve her task. If both sides of the team were motivated equally,
the task would have been completed within the set deadline.
The problem with the team that was auditing Mighty tech was that they received orders from
different points hence working from different principles. If the accounting firm had promised their
workers something for the deal, chances of completing the task could be increased (Anson and
Drews 2007, p. 76). This means that Bill and Beatrice could work in the same line of thought
with other team members. Unfortunately, this was not the case as each employer had
outstanding agreements with its own employees. At the end of the day, the team failed to
complete its task on time as Beatrice insisted on ensuring that she did everything in the right
Communication and Decision Making
In any team, communication is essential for the accomplishment of tasks being undertaken.
Communication enables team members to update each other on the progress hence ensuring
that they are all working in the right direction. This includes consulting from one another to
ensure that all tasks run as expected hence avoiding instances where some individual’s tasks
are declined by the team. In addition, decision-making should be centralized to certain team
members to avoid confusion (Draft 2010, p. 82). This means that there should be one point of
command charged with following up on all members.
You’re reading a preview
Preview Documents

To View Complete Document

Click the button to download
Subscribe to our plans

Download This Document