This article discusses the case of Chen v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCAFC 133 and its impact on the practice of migration agents in Australia. It also explores the legislative requirements for making a visa application while in Australia, using a hypothetical scenario of a person on a visitor's visa with a condition 8503. The article concludes with a discussion on the difference between a rejected and an invalid visa application.

Contextualising Learning in Australian Migration Law

To critically analyse elements of Australian Migration Law and provide conclusions informed by legislation and policy, focusing on the case of Chen v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCAFC 133.

Discover Chen v Minister for Immigration and its impact on migration agents in Australia. Learn visa application requirements.

Migration Law and its Application in Australia: A Case Study

Migration Law and its Application in Australia: A Case Study of Chen v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCAFC 133

This article discusses the implications of a migration law case, the types of bridging visas, and the process for applying for a partner visa.

Migration Law

This article discusses the implications of the case Beni v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection in Australian Migration Law. It explores the time limits for challenging visa cancellations and the jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit Court.

Implications of Beni v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

The case of Khan v Minister for Immigration & Anor highlights the importance of complying with Migration Regulations when applying for subclass skilled visa 485. The court ruled that even if the fault was not on the applicant's part, the visa cannot be granted if all requirements are not met. The case also sheds light on the duties of migration agents under the code of conduct.

Understanding Khan v Minister for Immigration & Anor: Implications for subclass skilled visa 485

LW3460 - In this report, we will explore Muradzi v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship FCA 976, which is based on Immigration Law. In this instance, the problem raised by the appeal was how to give proper meaning to parts of the Migration Act of 1958 and the Migration Regulations of 1994.

Immigration Law - Muradzi v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship| Report

Individual Report

This article discusses the implications of the case Ram v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1068 on migration law in Australia.

Migration Law and its Application in Australia: A Case Study of Chen v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCAFC 133

Migration Law

Implications of Beni v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

Understanding Khan v Minister for Immigration & Anor: Implications for subclass skilled visa 485

Immigration Law - Muradzi v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship| Report

Implications of Ram v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1068

Migration Law Act 1994 in Australia

Migration Law and its Application in Australia: A Case Study of Chen v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCAFC 133

Migration Lawlg...

Implications of Beni v Minister for Immigration and Border Protectionlg...

Understanding Khan v Minister for Immigration & Anor: Implications for subclass skilled visa 485lg...

Immigration Law - Muradzi v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship| Reportlg...

Implications of Ram v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1068lg...

Migration Law Act 1994 in Australialg...

Migration Law

Implications of Beni v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

Understanding Khan v Minister for Immigration & Anor: Implications for subclass skilled visa 485

Immigration Law - Muradzi v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship| Report

Implications of Ram v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1068

Migration Law Act 1994 in Australia