Milestone Two Technologies.

   

Added on  2023-03-30

4 Pages753 Words181 Views
Running head: Milestone Two Technologies 1
Milestone two technologies
[Author Name(s), First M. Last, Omit Titles and Degrees]
[Institutional Affiliation(s)]
Author Note
[Include any grant/funding information and a complete correspondence address.]
Milestone Two Technologies._1
Running head: Milestone Two Technologies 2
Technology: Police Officer
From the scenario above for the shoeprints, the above exhibit should be photographed
then placed like a fingerprint which is then logged. This is a very important piece of evidence in
this advance digital world crime fighting. The above information can be used to and analyzed to
give the type, make approximate size, description, number of suspects for the case and the path
used by the criminal during the incidence (Yang & Wen, 2017). Again in the above scenario, the
drops of blood can be used to give clues whether or not the incident was burglary or maybe a
victim not entirely in the scene. This blood is an important piece of evident hence must be
collected and documented properly. The blood sample can be photographed and once at the
station, the investigators can sue a DNA sequencer. And lastly, between the hammer and the
handprint, the investigation officer can use the AFIS to identify the suspect using any traces of
fingerprints that might have remained in the hammer (White & McQuilkin, 2011)
Technology: Prison Guard
First, the officer at the entrance should ask for proper identification for all the visitors.
The visitor must fill out the registration form and provides document identification documents to
validate identification they are who they claim to be. Every person entering the correction center
must go through a search either by walking through some metal detector or using a wand (Rocha,
Scheirer, Boult, & Goldenstein, 2011)
Milestone Two Technologies._2

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
United States v Jones, 132 S. Ct. 945 (2012): A warrant for GPS tracking and monitoring the respondent location in public streets
|3
|325
|349

The Use of Mass Surveillance Technology by Governments
|7
|1068
|59