Milgram Experiment Assignment Report
Added on 2022-08-24
5 Pages1216 Words41 Views
Running head: MILGRAM EXPERIMENT 1
Milgram Experiment
Name
Institutional Affiliation
Milgram Experiment
Name
Institutional Affiliation
MILGRAM EXPERIMENT 2
MILGRAM EXPERIMENT
Milgram shock experiment was never ethical at all as it never adhered to the Tri-Council
Policy Statement (TCPS)’s underlying value which is respect for human dignity. It never met
any of the BID research ethics board policy’s principles. Specifically, it never respected any of
the principles including respect for persons, concern for welfare and justice (Jansen, 2020).
Respect for persons: This required Stanley Milgram to have a moral obligations to
respect the participants’ autonomy and safeguard individuals with developing, impaired, or
diminished autonomy. Practically, moral obligations of respect include deference to judgment
and respect for participants’ freedom of choice in research project. Therefore, Stanley Milgram
was required to seek for free, informed and ongoing consent from his subjects and make sure that
the subjects understood the research purpose and associated risks.
Surprisingly, this was never the case as Milgram deceived his participants as they were
misled to believe they stood being recruited for an experiment in learning (Grzyb & Dolinski,
2017). Thus, there was a higher degree of deception as the subjects were never given a clear
explanation of any feasible risks before volunteering for this obedience experiment, instead the
subjects were led to believe they were causing physical injury to another person, exposing them
increasingly to potential psychological harm. Several subjects stood visibly distressed and
displayed signs of stress; sweating, trembling, nervous laughter, digging fingernails into palms
and biting lips. Moreover, it was later reported that 3 subjects had uncontrollable seizures in the
course of the experiment.
Concern for welfare: This principle required Stanley Milgram to have moral obligation
to safeguard, and in certain scenarios, promote, the participants’ welfare in lieu of foreseeable
risks linked with the experiment. This means that subjects have to be provided sufficient info to
MILGRAM EXPERIMENT
Milgram shock experiment was never ethical at all as it never adhered to the Tri-Council
Policy Statement (TCPS)’s underlying value which is respect for human dignity. It never met
any of the BID research ethics board policy’s principles. Specifically, it never respected any of
the principles including respect for persons, concern for welfare and justice (Jansen, 2020).
Respect for persons: This required Stanley Milgram to have a moral obligations to
respect the participants’ autonomy and safeguard individuals with developing, impaired, or
diminished autonomy. Practically, moral obligations of respect include deference to judgment
and respect for participants’ freedom of choice in research project. Therefore, Stanley Milgram
was required to seek for free, informed and ongoing consent from his subjects and make sure that
the subjects understood the research purpose and associated risks.
Surprisingly, this was never the case as Milgram deceived his participants as they were
misled to believe they stood being recruited for an experiment in learning (Grzyb & Dolinski,
2017). Thus, there was a higher degree of deception as the subjects were never given a clear
explanation of any feasible risks before volunteering for this obedience experiment, instead the
subjects were led to believe they were causing physical injury to another person, exposing them
increasingly to potential psychological harm. Several subjects stood visibly distressed and
displayed signs of stress; sweating, trembling, nervous laughter, digging fingernails into palms
and biting lips. Moreover, it was later reported that 3 subjects had uncontrollable seizures in the
course of the experiment.
Concern for welfare: This principle required Stanley Milgram to have moral obligation
to safeguard, and in certain scenarios, promote, the participants’ welfare in lieu of foreseeable
risks linked with the experiment. This means that subjects have to be provided sufficient info to
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.
Related Documents
Ethical Dilemmas in Stanford Prison Experimentlg...
|5
|1133
|475