Motor Vehicle Negligence Complaint in North Carolina Court
Verified
Added on 2023/06/14
|4
|979
|56
AI Summary
This is a complaint of motor vehicle negligence in North Carolina court. The plaintiff, a California citizen, suffered physical and property damages due to the defendant's failure to obey traffic signals. The plaintiff is seeking compensation for medical expenses, loss of earnings, and damages for losing earning ability.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Motor Vehicle Negligence1 MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE By Name Course Instructor Institution Location Date
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Motor Vehicle Negligence2 NORTH CAROLINAIN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION GUILFORD COUNTY13 CVS ________________ Robert S. Payne) ) Plaintiff,) ) Vs.)COMPLAINT )(MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE) Danielle Nicole Conaway) ) Defendant.) The Plaintiff, Robert S. Payne, complaining of the Defendants, allege and say as follows: 1.Plaintiff, Robert S. Payne, is an individual and is now, and at all times stated in this complaint was, an occupant of Greensboro city of North California. The defendant, Danielle Nicole Conaway, is at all times cited in this complaint was a firm that is organized and is existing under the laws of northern California and, always alleged herein, was undertaking business in Guilford County, North Carolina. 2.This is an exploit for personal injury and property loss following a car accident near Greensboro city on W Market Street on September 8, 2016. The plaintiff who is a California citizen was on board a commercial vehicle of make MAZDA with plate numbers JYJ6249, NC 2008 travelling south on Green Valley Road and was in the middle lane going through the intersection of W. Market. The plaintiff had the green traffic to proceed through the intersection. At the same, the defendant was also travelling west on W. Market Street also in the middle lane going through the intersection. The traffic signal for the westbound traffic on the W. Market Street had just turned solid red but the defendant proceeded on and entered the intersection. The resulting scene was the defendant hitting the plaintiff. Owing to the negligence of the defendant, the plaintiff suffered several properties and physical damages (Coggin, 2014). 3.From the accident, plaintiff suffered serious, painful and permanent body injuries, great pain of body and mind and was therefore unable to normally transact his business as well as losing the capacity for enjoying life. This is because he suffered a concussion, torn rotator cuff, fractured left scapula, two fractured left ribs and badly bruised left rib area and left knee. COUNT 1 Negligence 4.The defendant, being a driver, has the duty of ensuring that all the traffic rules are well followed without selection. It is also his duty to ensure that his and other road user’s safety are well observed and equally protected.
Motor Vehicle Negligence3 5.The defendant was the genuine and proximate cause of the damages and subsequent injuries suffered by the plaintiff. In particular, the defendant’s failure to observe and obey the traffic signal and thus his carelessness was the substantial factor leading to the accident. 6.The defendant had a duty of ensuring he is a qualified and competent driver to operate the vehicle. The actions therefore alleged above constitute negligence by the defendant 7.The incurred medical expenses of the plaintiff totalled to $7,500 8.The plaintiff's car which was then valued at $12,000 was completely destroyed (Showers, 2010). COUNT 2 N.C. Gen. Stat. § 75-1.1 Unfair and deceptive practices affecting life 9.The defendant was the genuine cause of the accident being he did not care following the well laid out traffic rules that ensure safety of all road users. Being a victim of the occurrences, the plaintiff ought to be subjected to compensation for the damages and injuries suffered as stated in the above paragraphs. 10.On account of Defendants’ Unfair and Deceptive Practices Affecting life, the plaintiff is entitled to recover damages and injuries suffered in the amount of $35,000 WHEREFORE,Plaintiff hope for judgment against defendant as follows; 1.General damages in a sum to be proven at trial; 2.Medical damages and related expenditure rendering to proof; 3.Loss or earnings damages according to proof; 4.Incurred suit costs; 5.Damages for losing earning ability rendering to proof; 6.Loss of earnings damages according to proof and 7.For such other and further relief as to the Court may seem just and proper. This the9thday of April 2018. _________________________________ Robert S. Payne Attorney for Plaintiff 226 East Avondale Drive Greensboro, NC 27403 (336) 294-1361 N.C. State Bar Number 6329 NORTH CAROLINAIN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION GUILFORD COUNTY13 CVS ______________
Motor Vehicle Negligence4 Robert S. Payne) ) Plaintiff,) ) Vs.)VERIFICATION ) Danielle Nicole Conaway) ) Defendant.) [Robert S. Payne], first being accordingly sworn, says that he is the Plaintiff in the action foregoing, he has read the foregoing Grievance, and knows the contents thereof, and the same is true of his own knowledge, except those matters and things alleged upon information and belief, and as to those matters and things, he believes them to be true. __________________________________ [Robert S. Payne] SWORN TO and subscribed before me this the 9thday of April 2018. ________________________________________ Notary Public My Commission Expires: __________________ REFERENCES Coggin, R.G., 2014. Attorney Negligence... A Suit within a Suit.W. Va. L. Rev.,60, p.225. Showers, J.L., 2010. What you need to know about negligence lawsuits.Nursing,30(2), p.45.