This article discusses the safeguarding plans for Leo, Mrs. B, and Susi, addressing their specific concerns and risks. It explores the actions taken to ensure their safety and well-being.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Name1 Safeguarding plan Student’s Name University Date Course
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Name2 Safeguarding plan Summary of the reasonable grounds for concerns that have been established (Give a summary of the investigation/assessment process and an analysis of allegation/concern Safeguarding plans seek to provide care in relation to the aspects that the patient is facing as a way of protecting them against the issues that they face. In most cases, this includes addressing the risks of abuse through interventions that restore and assist the patient to meet personal needs (Graham, 2016). From the cases, Leo presents the case of abuse where he risks being arrested in possession of illegal packages. Since he has been delivering packages at a small fee but yet he does not know what is in the packages, then the involvement in this nature of business presents a risk to him. Further, he has been informed to stop the behavior and even banning him from the pub but he insists the men are his friends since he has not been able to identify any problem of abuse. The vulnerability of Leo is based on the exploitation of his down syndrome by the new friends who are exploiting him without his knowledge. Thus the main issue here is the kind of people that he is associating with and the risks that he could be exposing himself. The indicator of concern here is the fact that his behaviors have changed, he frequents a local pub, is involved in the delivery of packages for the new friends and the fact that the support staff tried to ban him and he refused saying that he can do what he likes means that he has adopted completely different behaviors are indicators of concern that show his life is getting out of hand. Being a person with Down syndrome, Leo lacks the capacity to analyze situation well since his condition impairs judgment. The case of Mrs. B. who is admitted in hospital with a fall which has led to a reduction in mobility thus requiring full support with personal care needs. She seems confused and thus transitioning to home may be risky which calls for the need to admit her in a care home. Despite the support persona and her daughter feeling that her needs will be met more in the social care home, she insists that she does not want to go to the care home. This means that Mrs. B. requires a care plan based on what the social care worker indicated as being able to be care at her home. The risk that Mrs. B. presents here is that she does not want to go to the care home and the care plan that needs to be developed at home has to meet her needs. The main issue here is developing a care package that meets Mrs. B’s health needs. However, there is an issue of concern where there is conflict between views of the physiotherapist and her daughter with those of the social care worker and herself. This misunderstanding is a wrong indicator that may compromise the health of the patient. From the case she has the capacity to make the health choices on where she wants to heal from either the social care place or her home but I think patient autonomy needs to be respected. On the other hand, the case of Susi presents a woman who is lonely and only relies on social care support. She has started seeing someone online and send her photos to the person. However, she risks being exploited and abused since she has a moderate learning disability which the individual may exploit. One risk that Susi presents is the fact that she has been married twice and she is widowed and divorced at the same time. This means that her psychological wellbeing may be weak thus risking her to a psychological breakdown. The main issue of concern this is the exposure that Susi may be leading herself to which can lead to online abuse. The main indicator
Name3 that shows this is a problem is the factshe has started sending her photos to a stranger without knowing exactly what she has gotten herself into. Despite that Susi has the capacity to make decisions only if she is assisted to understand how to make the right decisions and choices about the issues that she is facing.
Name4 What are you trying to achieve What specific safeguarding actions are you taking to achieve this Who is going to do this When will this be completed Review date Review Status/Update - Initial review of planned actions must be within six months Patient Name: Leo Address the obsessive or compulsive behaviour. Obsessive behaviour is one of the challenges that adult down syndrome patients present. According to (Capone, Aidikoff, Taylor, & Rykiel, 2013) This entails the way in which the affected person develops new behaviours that seem inappropriate behaviours that the patient has developed. Such behaviours risk the life of the patient since he does not seem to know what is going on in his life and thus this is the risk of abuse that the new friends are posing to Leo. Use of pharmacotherapy to reduce co- morbid behaviours. Down syndrome patients experience cognitive decline if they fail to use their medications regularly(Mittal, et al., 2013). The fact that Leo has changed his behaviours and become obsessive may require pharmacotherapy to enable him achieve his normal cognitive functions. Another way that can be used to address the challenge that Leo is facing is to help him understand the challenges that he is exposing himself to and how this can lead to other challenges (Allahyari & Wolf-Branigin 2018, P. 4). For example, interventions need to be used to develop the relationship between Leo and the care settings so that he can be able to understand his life. Since Leo lacks information on how he is exposing himself to abuse, there is need to address the relationship issues that Leo has developed. This means that interventions have to focus on shifting The patient The care worker After three weeks Every week Review after every one month to determine the progress
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Name5 his attention from the local pub to other activities that can still keep him engaged. Since he is not willing to stop seeing the friends and he thinks that they are good to him, then the baseline to address the triggers of the friendship by developing alternative ways of keeping him busy. This will lead to better outcomes since he will have divided attention. The next step will be to develop a positive behaviour support plan that will focus on addressing the new attitude that Leo has picked up. This entails strategies for addressing the settings, and use of differential reinforcement of behaviours that need to be followed (Feeley & Jones 2018, p. 156). This will make Leo positive and able to follow the required behaviour patterns. Patient name: Susi To address the aspects of online relationships that may be abusive to Susi. Since online relationships can sometimes be abusive, it is important to ensure that people understand how they handle online relationships and ways of From the case study, Susi seems to have a history of challenging relationships where she has been widowed and divorced. In this case, she is vulnerable to relationships thus the need to ensure that she develops the right approach to relationships and handling the issues that revolve around the online communication. In this case, the role of the care person is to assist The care worker Within one week Every month For three months to understand if the individual has understood the requirements
Name6 determining if a relationship is abusive. In this case, it is important for online users to learn the first signs of a red flag and be able to address them before they become abused. Susi to learn ways of assessing online abuse. The first thing that the care provider needs to know is the extent of the personal information and photos that she has shared with the online boyfriend. This means that the care provider needs to explore the extent of damage if any before developing a safeguarding plan that meets the needs of the individual (Rice, et al. 2015, p. 5). There is a need to understand whether the photos have been shared willingly or there has been pressure to share them. Further, there is a need to explore the safety issues in the relationship especially through any information that has made her feel threatened or insecure. This includes the pressure to carry out certain activities which seem inappropriate is another way of harassment or abuse. This means that the individual needs to learn how to identify the first signs of abuse and ensure that they are adequately addressed before they can escalate. According to Selkie, Evans, Ton, Midamba, & Moreno (2018, p. 5) electronic harassment and abuse takes many forms which require the user to understand them to be able to develop the best way of dealing with them.
Name7 This means that Susi needs to be taught the use of cognitive restructuring which is a way of ensuring that she protects herself and understands the boundaries that she needs to go when sharing information online. Further technical strategies like blocking users who fail to recognize her privacy can be effective in protecting her interests and ensuring that she is not exploited. This means that learning how to protect herself is the best technical strategy that Susi requires. In this situation, she needs to understand the challenges of such online relationships and how to deal with them. Salihu, Wilson, King, Marty, & Whiteman (2015, p. 87) argues that from the socio-ecological model, individual behavior is integrated with the dynamic network of intrapersonal characteristics that allow them to interact with the environment. Thus for Susi to learn how to deal with the issues that affect her, she needs to understand her input in search relationships and how it meets her needs. Patients Name Mrs B. Assist Mrs. B. in avoiding One recommendation that has been regarded as the best way to deal withThe careEveryReview onAfter three months
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Name8 future falls which can cause. Falls are common to elderly people because they are a result of their interaction with the environment. According to Al-Aama (2011, p. 774), falling is the common mechanism of injury in the elderly population. The level injuries vary from person to person and the nature of the fall. In most cases, the common falls that these people experience are domestic falls which normally take place in their homes. Further, one percent of these falls lead to hip fractures which pose high morbidity and mortality of the people that are involved. This means that to achieve this problem there is a need to focus on ensuring that the environment that the people live in. elderly falls is exercise. In most cases, adults experience increased falls because they are weak and have morbidity challenges that increase their likelihood of falling. As people grow old, their body joints and muscles become weak and sometimes painful thus reducing their morbidity. According to Lee, Lee, & Khang (2013), although this does not have high effects on reducing falls, it leads to increased benefits since it allows the adults to easily coordinate their environment. By exercising and being fit, fall prevention is achieved through increased physical movement of the affected person. Thus in the case of Mrs. B exercise is vital in achieving healing and reducing the challenges that she may be facing in her life. Further, Romagnoli, Handler, Ligons, & Hochheiser (2013) suggests that the patient can be linked to exercise support groups within the locality that he comes from or she can be linked to TV programs that offer exercise options for the aged like the TV chair yoga programs that teach people how to exercise which will keep her fit. This will have other secondary benefits besides being fit. Another care plan that will be appropriate for the patient is education worker Mrs B.’s daughter Mrs B. weeka forty night
Name9 which focusses on Mrs. B and other support persons that are working with. Patient education has been regarded as one of the sustainable ways of ensuring that the patient is able to manage their condition and achieve better healing. Thus to reduce the harm and safety issues that expose her to falls, she needs to learn how to manage the environment by addressing the hazards and any other thing within the home environment. According to Delaney (2018, p. 120) patient education entails a patient-centered approach that seeks to empower the patient with the right skills for managing the environment that they live in. in the case of Mrs. B. there is need to address factors that expose her to falls in her environment. These factors need to be mastered by her daughter since she had refused to go the care home and the care worker believes that she can manage her condition at home.
Name10 References Al-Aama, T., 2011. Falls in the elderly: Spectrum and prevention.Canadian Family Physician, 57(7), p. 771–776. Allahyari, T. & Wolf-Branigin, M. E., 2018. Quality of Life of Adults with Down syndrome in Virginia.Journal of Down Syndrome & Chromosome Abnormalities,4(1). Capone, G., Aidikoff, J., Taylor, K. & Rykiel, N., 2013. Adolescents and young adults with Down’s syndrome presenting to a medical clinic with depression: co-morbid obstructive sleep apnea.American Journal of Medical Genetics,161(9), pp. 2188-2196. Delaney, L., 2018. Patient-centred care as an approach to improving health care in Australia. Collegian,25(1), pp. 119-123. Feeley, K. & Jones, E., 2018. Strategies to address challenging behaviour in young children with Down syndrome.Down Syndrome Research and Practice,2(2), pp. 153-163. Graham, K. E., 2016. Models of safeguarding in England : Identifying important models and variables influencing the operation of adult safeguarding.Journal of Social Work,5(2), pp. 1-10. Lee, A., Lee, K.-W. & Khang, P., 2013. Preventing Falls in the Geriatric Population. Permanente Journal,17(4), pp. 37-39. Mittal, A. K. et al., 2013. Early onset obsessive compulsive disorder with obsessive slowness: A case report and demonstration of management.Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine,35(4), pp. 407-409. Rice, E. et al., 2015. Cyberbullying Perpetration and Victimization Among Middle-School Students.American Journal of Public Health,105(3). Romagnoli, K., Handler, S., Ligons, F. & Hochheiser, H., 2013. Home-care nurses' perceptions of unmet information needs and communication difficulties of older patients in the immediate post-hospital discharge period.BMJ quality & safety,,22(4). Salihu, H. M. Salihu, Wilson, R. E., King, L. M., Marty, P. J., Whiteman, V. E., 2015. Socio- ecological Model as a Framework for Overcoming Barriers and Challenges in Randomized Control Trials in Minority and Underserved Communities.International Journal of MCH and AIDS,3(1), pp. 85-95. Selkie, E., Yolanda, E.; Adrienne, T., Midamba, N. Moreno, M.A., 2018. Ideas for addressing electronic harassment among adolescents attending a video blogging convention.BMC Public Health,18(973).