Negligence Case Report - Court Report on Negligence Law

Running head: COMMMERCIAL LAW
COURT REPORT
NEGLIGENCE LAW
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note

1COMMMERCIAL LAW
NAME: Supreme Court NSW
ADDRESS: 184 Philip St. Sydney NSW 2000 Australia
JUDGE: XYZ, J
TITLE: Negligence Case Report
PARTIES: Mr. Arthur (Appellant) v Snowboard Resort (Respondent)
[Hypothetical]
DATE: 29 May 2018
COUNSEL: A J L BANNON (APPELLANT)
W E JACOB (RESPONDENT)
CATCHWORD: PROCEDURE- Negligence claim by appellant-
Respondent has failed to take proper care- Appellant
Suffered injury- counterclaim made by respondent-
A claim for contributory negligence made- Evidences
Submitted- court’s observation.

2COMMMERCIAL LAW
Summary of facts:
Appellant and two of his friends had made a trip to New South Wales for skiing. They
had contacted with the respondent’s company. An annual carnival was going on and they had
booked a day with certain discount. The ski ground was quite sloppy and it had a bad past
history. However, appellant and two of his friends had participated in the race and they had paid
registration fees. From the views and contentions of the witnesses of the case, it has been
observed that appellant had consumed certain alcohol at the day of accident. When he had tried
to enter into the race ground, the authority has asked him to leave the ground, as his condition
was not good. However, he paid no heed to it, started to ski, and met with a serious accident. The
preliminary court had held the appellant partly liable for the accident.
Facts of the case:
The main facts of the case are to determine whether the ski authority was negligent to
take proper care of the appellant or not. Further, it is to be determined whether appellant was
liable for his injuries or not.
People taking part:
In this case, there are certain witnesses had stated their opinions and respective advocates
had submitted their evidences to make their position strong. Further, the report made by the
police in this case has been submitted. The doctor who observed the injury of the appellant has
also been introduced and the blood report of the appellant has been submitted.
Considering the facts of the case, it has been proved that appellant had consumed alcohol
that fateful day and the bar tender had verified the fact. According to him, the appellant had