Can Susan be held liable for the loss suffered by Cliff and Mary?
Demonstrate knowledge of Australian Business Law, analyze legal issues, interpret legislation and cases, understand compliance and apply law to business management.
7 Pages2289 Words116 Views
Added on 2023-06-08
About This Document
The article discusses the case of Cliff and Mary suing Susan for the loss suffered by them due to the release of a Bengal tiger. The article analyzes the elements of negligence and liability, including duty of care, breach of duty, causation, and remoteness of damages. The article concludes that Susan cannot be held liable for the damages suffered by Cliff and Mary as she did not breach her duty of care.
No documents found. Try with a different documents.
Analysis of Negligence Liability in the Case of Cliff and Mary vs Susan
|7
|2264
|195
Negligence and Liability in Business Law: A Case Study
|7
|2341
|85
Suit for Negligence: Elements, Defences and Application
|6
|2401
|444
Can Cliff and Mary recover their damages by filing a suit of negligence against Susan?
|6
|2283
|397
Role of Foresight in the Neighbour Principle in Modern Negligence Law
|10
|3885
|439
Can Cliff and Mary sue Susan for negligence?
|7
|2387
|124