1 NEOLIBERLISM AND GLOBALIZATION Economic globalization refers to the developments of global financial integration which began in the late 20thcentury instigated by the neoliberal ideals (Vives-Cases et al., 2015). Entrenched in the traditional liberal economic thought, neoliberalism asserts that a chiefly free-for-all capitalist economy symbolizes the ideal of unrestricted individual choice as well as capitalizes on economic productivity and progress, technological development and distributive justice (Burn,2013). Feminist theorists claim that economic globalization should be comprehended in relation to the impacts it has made on women, who are positioned in a disproportionate proportion of the global poor. The essay will analyse ways in which economic globalisation and poverty intersect with other types of oppression. Also, it will explain ways in which women are directly impacted by neoliberalism and globalization. The key aspect of feminist approaches to economic globalization is an importance on feminist methodologies. Furthermore, these approaches are likely to represent three key methodological assurances. The first is linked to intersectionality, which chiefly upholds that systems of oppression tend to intersect with forms of oppressions like social injustices. As a result,genderinjusticescannotbecomprehendedsolelyinrelationtosexorsexual characteristics. According toVives-Cases et al. (2015), feminist theoretical understanding which posits justice on the domestic level claim that the experiences encountered by women of sexual oppression are mainly influenced by other forms of oppression related to ethnicity, class, disability as well as sexual orientation. Furthermore, as per feminist perspective of globalization, it is argued that gender oppression interrelates to these systems of oppression, in addition to other forms of systematic detriment that rise within the global context (Hobbs & Rice, 2018).Moreover, there is an increasing concern about the aspect of feminization of poverty as well as the impact that globalization is having on this vital social issue.Okşak and Koyuncu (2017)have claimed that gender inequality tends to persist in all regions wherein women and young girls continue to be over-represented amongst the poor population of the
2 NEOLIBERLISM AND GLOBALIZATION world. This puts forward that women are not constantly getting aided by the economic, political as well as social gains which globalization offers. On the other hand, it appears that economically deprived women, mainly those living in emerging countries, are experiencing high burdens by the expenses of these rapid alterations to the damage of their personal health conditions (Burn,2013). Furthermore, women tend to absorb significant portion of the consequential adversity as they usually remain to fill the care gaps the reorganizations through globalization tend to generate.Hughes (1987) mentions in Insight 2 that women the poverty which they experience is due to their own faults and seeks help to deal with this self- hatred. “I believe inside myself that I was (am) a bad person where I was (am) poor. I know better in my head.” On the other hand, the globalization of domestic and care work has led to an increasing number of women join the workforce. However, even though they experience decent work conditions, on a critical side they encounter extensive abuse which involved forced confinement, excessive level of work pressure in addition to physical, social as well as psychological and sexual abuse.Burn (2013) has claimed that globalization is not simply driven by trade openness and FDI. Several other aspects of globalisation linked to easier and low-priced travel and communication prospects have been increasing the rate of forced labour of women employees in the form of sexual as well as other trafficking to developed nation which has been termed as the ‘underside of globalisation’ by the ILO (Hobbs & Rice, 2018). Controlled choices as well as occasions potentially characterize the state of women who show resistance in accepting the immigration status. Although the UK asylum system claims to offer security, women revealed unsafe and persecutory situations to be part of the system. In consequence, the narratives of migrated women position the UK asylum system in a miserable and intolerant attacker of human rights (Smith, 2015).On the other hand,in the opinion ofHobbs and Rice (2018), completely stopping trafficking is challenging due to the
3 NEOLIBERLISM AND GLOBALIZATION growing demands and consistent supply of potential victims of poverty to give opportunities for sustenance. At this juncture, the only way to lessen the demand is through the fear and prosecution of perpetrators (Baru & Mohan, 2018). This method will need strong support and assistance from the governments of all the countries facing the issue. Neo-liberalism supports and endorses the free distribution of traded goods and of capital. According toHobbs and Rice (2018), neo-liberalism opposes rules and regulations of government of factors related to income, working conditions and health services as well as environmental protections.Neoliberalism intersects as well as redefines the role of state as well as commercialised health facilities resulting in creatingas an initiator of gender-based health discriminations.The rise of religious fundamentalisms is considered as a radical development of neoliberalism which is subjective to the dissatisfactions of liberalisation as well as globalisation.According toBaru and Mohan (2018), one of the highly extensive outcomes of religious intrusion towards gender-based wellbeing injustices is the preventable and stoppable death and illness that arise from unsafe abortion in spite of the accessibility of progressive medical expertise for harmlessly ending pregnancy. In several countries across the world, the use of abortion facilities are limited and forbidden on dutiful grounds, compelling women to use insecure and unlawful abortions, in that way threat their lives and health conditions (Hobbs & Rice, 2018). The discussion regarding access to abortion facilities arranges the religious consideration of choices of women. To conclude, as globalization will undoubtedly continue, the aforementioned issues show likelihood of increasing in the upcoming years.Thus, without improved and superior participation as well as representation, the awareness, opinions as well as involvements of several women in the entire world will continue to be mistreated as well as ignored. Most importantly, the constructive impact which globalization will have on the wellbeing, health as well as development of women will fail to be fully recognized.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4 NEOLIBERLISM AND GLOBALIZATION References Baru, R. V., & Mohan, M. (2018).Globalisation and neoliberalism as structural drivers of health inequities.Health research policy and systems,16(1), 91. Burn, S. M. (2013).Women and Globalization.Gender and Women’s Studies in Canada, 529. Hobbs, M., & Rice, C. (Eds.). (2018).Gender and Women's Studies: Critical Terrain. Canadian Scholars. Hughes, N. (1987). Why I Can't Write About Class.Fireweed, (25), 21. OKŞAK, Y., & Koyuncu, J. Y. (2017). Does globalization affect female labor force participation: Panel evidence.Journal of Economics Bibliography,4(4), 381-387. Smith,K.(2015).Storiestoldby,for,andaboutwomenrefugees:Engendering resistance.ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies,14(2), 461- 469. Vives-Cases, C., Eriksson, M., Goicolea, I., & Öhman, A. (2015). Gender and health inequalities:intersectionswithotherrelevantaxesofoppression.Globalhealth action,8.