This paper discusses the fundamentals of project management, including project leadership, risks in designing and executing major projects, and management ethics. It also explores the leadership styles and factors contributing to project success. The case study of NASA is used as an example throughout the paper.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
NETWORK PROJECT MANAGEMENT1 The best project managers are emotionally driven a case study of NASA Name of student Name of institution Date
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
NETWORK PROJECT MANAGEMENT2 Executive summary Leadership skills that leaders should have plays a critical role in the growth and development of an organization. Leadership is the process by which leaders of an organization may influence people’s behavior in a way that they enthusiastically and willingly strive towards achieving the objectives of an organization. The primary purpose of writing this paper is to develop an understanding of the fundamentals of project management. It will expressly reflect on project leadership, risks that are associated with new projects designing and current research theories and management ethics. Introduction Project management fundamentals identifiers, the major process and the needs of project management. These are scope, quality, budget and schedule. For company to attain its objectives, there is need to have leaders with adequate skills and knowledge to control business process effectively and efficiently. To understand the fundamentals of project management, I will discuss risk in designing and executing major projects, leadership issues, management ethics, leadership style, project success factor and ethical issues based on the case NASA case study. Risk in designing and executing major projects Regardless of a well-planned project, it encounter some troubles. A risk is a uncertain condition or event that may affect a planned project. The risk that may affects the design and execution of major projects involves, weather, technical issues, cost, political issues, environment, clients etc. Some of the basic ways that a company may use to handle this risk involves: Avoidance- the best thing that can be done is to avoid, it is possible to prevent the risk occurrence.
NETWORK PROJECT MANAGEMENT3 Mitigation – if risk can be avoided, it should be mitigated, this means taking appropriate action to minimize damages that would be caused by the risk. Transfer- transfer risk to someone else, e.g. it can be transfer to an insurance company. Leadership issues Leadership issues are problems that arise from ineffective management of a project. Leadership is not just a title; a leader must be capable of guiding a team and motivating it toward accomplishing the goals of the organization. The unmet goal is as a result of bad leadership whichmightcomealongwithsomeproblemswhichinclude:lackofmorale,lossof coordination and teamwork as well as lack of direction. If a leader is not competent, he/she cannot lead a team and therefore they all lack vision due to lack of clear instructions, they don’t have a guide on how to carry out their task and will, therefore, work with no direction which most likely leads to failure of the project [1].There also lack coordination and teamwork among the team members because the leader has failed in bringing them together; everyone works alone and is likely to make mistakes that may affect the whole project. The team members also lack morale as the project leader tend to care less about the project as well as the wellbeing of his/her team members; this may cause a high employee turnover. Leadership styles A leadership style is a way of directing, implementing strategies and motivating workers by the leader.
NETWORK PROJECT MANAGEMENT4 Charles’ leadership models are based on two continuums axes which are: emotional- logical decision-making process and the intuited- sensed data preference. These two continuums give rise to four types of leadership which are: Cultivating emotional-intuitive leader- this kind of leader is useful in appreciating people and cares much about them; he/she can build strong loyalty. Emotional- sensing leader: this kind of a leader is able to make workers feel that they are part of the project, he/she is successful in building peaceful teams and can work with the most challenging people, and they are all able to work as a team. Visionary logical-intuitive leader: this type of a leader who is creative and innovative, always focused on getting new ideas that lead to research in the early stages of a project. The directing logical-sensing leader: this type of leader who is appropriately organized and with a high level of discipline, he/she is a system builder who puts the tasks first and achieves the goals passionately. Project success Having a good project leader is a key to the success of the project, a leader should be able to properly plan and effectively communicate to his/her team members for a project to succeed. The team has to work together to implement the plans; they also have to plan smart where all participants should be present during planning to know the direction the project is to take. Proper planning does not only help in achieving goals on time but also keeps the team on focus. Proper communication is another necessity for a successful project. It is necessary that the manager updates the team on the specific tasks and goals to be accomplished [2].
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
NETWORK PROJECT MANAGEMENT5 In case of a problem arising it should be communicated immediately to avoid affecting the whole project negatively. This can only be achieved if the leader can develop and maintain food teamwork and therefore, the best leadership style that can lead a project to success is the emotion-sensing leader. This is because such a leader is able to build a harmonious team and even draw those members that are very difficult to deal with so that they can also participate and together work as a team which is very important for a project to be successful [3]. Ethical issues Ethical issues are situations where organizations or individuals are stuck between two options, one which is right while the other is wrong. Hubble telescope had a situation in which they experienced the ethical issue of conflict of interest and also duties of the society. In both cases, they acted unethically [4]. During its launch where NASA was pressured politically for timely launch and was answering to the executive branch, similarly Morton Thiokol was experiencing the same pressure, and therefore the decision made for launching may have been made under the wrong interest rather than the ethical interest of the wellbeing of the crew and the morality of the system [5]. The company would have avoided the ethical issue on conflict of interest by being aware of all interested parties and be open about them, this way they could be able to prevent future disgrace and also avoid preferences made due to conflict of interest. They have also had an ethical issue of duties to society, with the launch of the Hubble telescope there were obviously environmental consequences through contamination of air by the rockets which caused global warming and affect the entire community through climate change. It
NETWORK PROJECT MANAGEMENT6 brought along religious conflict where Catholics could not admit that earth is at the center of the solar system. By considering the duties of the social issues, they should have tried to avoid matters that could affect the society though not all that could be avoided they should seek for a smooth progress [6].
NETWORK PROJECT MANAGEMENT7 References [1] Koepsell, D. (2010). On genies and bottles: scientists’ moral responsibility and dangerous technology R&D. Science and engineering ethics, 16(1), 119-133. [2] Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2012). Ethical decision-making and internet research: Version 2.0. recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee. Available online: aoir. org/reports/ethics2. pdf. [3] Müller, R., & Jugdev, K. (2012). Critical success factors in projects: Pinto, Slevin, and Prescott–the elucidation of project success. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(4), 757-775. [4] Müller, R., & Turner, R. (2010). Leadership competency profiles of successful project managers. International Journal of project management, 28(5), 437-448. [5] Rolston, H. (2012). Environmental ethics. Temple University Press. [6]Dang, J., Yuan, K., Shi, J., Huang, H. and Wang, L., 2019. Monitoring System Design Based on Kingview Sewage Treatment.Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, pp.1-11.