This article discusses the ethical dilemma faced by Bob Moore, the project manager, and provides alternatives to mitigate the risks associated with the project. It also covers PM leadership, execution, and risk analysis.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head:NETWORK PROJECT MANAGEMENT Network Project Management Name of the Student Name of the University Author Note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
2 NETWORK PROJECT MANAGEMENT 1. PM Leadership Bob Moore is an experienced superintendent of the organization yet he has shown an autocratic leadership in tackling the problem. Bob did not consult the other team members while taking a decision of sending the carpenters for his own personal work. Although his intention behind the decision of sending the carpenters to his home was to keep them motivated and not to pay them for doing nothing, paying the carpenters from the project’s budget was not a good decision.From the employees’ perspective, the leadership style shown by Bob Moore is that of a motivator however, his leadership skills proved to be not beneficial for the organization. Jim Ray being an assistant project manager tried to work for the company and has shown a transformational leadership [5]. He tried to talk to Bob at first before talking any decision considering his experience in the firm. 2. PM Execution There are some serious problems associated with execution of the project. This is mainly because the winter rains have put a break on the normal operations of the project. This signifies an improper project management plan that has been prepared in the initiation phase of the project. The project might not have faced these problems if the carpenters are hired on a contractual basis and not on daily wage basis. Furthermore, it was the responsibility of the project manager to consider the time loss due to rains while preparing the project plan since winter and spring rains are a natural phenomenon. 3. PM Risk Analysis The project management plan must have identified and analysed the schedule risk that the project faced due to winter and spring rains. The outdoor works should have not been scheduled during the rains in the project plan. [4] The current condition gives rise to schedule risk as well as budget risks in the project [3]. These risks should have been identified in the project plan. As a mitigation plan for the identified risk, either the carpenters should have been paid and hired on a contractual basis that could have mitigated the budget risk or the outdoor works could have been scheduled either before or after the rains. 4. Ethics Assessment Bob in order to keep the carpenters motivated and engaged assigned them some tasks in his own house. However, he continued to pay the carpenters from the project cost which was unethical [6].
3 NETWORK PROJECT MANAGEMENT This ethical dilemma does not abide by the law. According to the code of ethics and professional conduct, respect, responsibility, honesty and fairness are certain values and characteristics that drive the ethical conduct a project should acknowledge [8]. Bob has not been honest with the organization while paying the carpenters for the project. This therefore does not align with the PMI code of ethics and Professional Conduct. 5. Ethics Alternatives In the current situation there are very less alternatives present. Bob does not want to lose the resources of the project and therefore has engaged the carpenters in his own works. As an alternative to the following condition, it is recommended that the carpenters should be engaged in the other works of the project or should work for the organization and not in the house of Bob [7]. Furthermore, it is recommended that if the carpenters are engaged with the works in the house of Bob, the carpenters should be stopped paying from the budget of the project. If the carpenters are involved with the internal works of the organization then they can be paid from the project cost. The benefit of the carpenters remaining involved in certain other works of the organization is that the situation will not be unethical. However, this option will not mitigate the schedule risk of the project [9]. There is another alternative for the current situation which is to prevent the carpenters to work during the rains. Although the advantage of this alternative is that it will mitigate the identified budget risk from the project, it will result in the loss of the project resources which may not be afforded by the project team. 6. Ethics Analysis According to the PMI ethical decision making framework, there are a number of steps that is involved with the ethical decision making. These steps are assessing the ethical dilemma, considering the alternative choice of the project, analysing the candidate decision, applying the ethical principles and making the final decision [10]. In the current situation, all the steps of assessing and considering the alternative choices have already been performed. On assessing the alternatives, it has been found out that the key decision is to involve the carpenters in internal works of the project which will not only keep them motivated but also will stop the unethical wastage of the resources of the project by eliminating the need of paying the carpenters for doing the works in Bob’s house [2]. 7. Ethics Application
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4 NETWORK PROJECT MANAGEMENT The choice of involving the carpenters in certain other works of the organization will surely result in greatest good mainly because it is ethical. This decision will keep the carpenters motivated and they will not lose their jobs as well. Although the decision will do very little to address the schedule risk, the decision is found to be beneficial for all the concerned parties. With this decision, Jim will not have to take any step against one of the most experienced employees of the organization that is Bob. Furthermore, the decision of Bob to keep the carpenters engaged and motivated will be acknowledged as well. 8. Ethics Action On analysing the situation from an ethical perspective, it can be said that the choice of keeping the carpenters engaged will be of greatest good. This proves that there was no wrong in the leadership style of Bob although the path he chose was unethical [1]. The decision removes the ethical dilemmas associated with the project and with the situation and therefore the choice of involving the carpenters and the workers in certain other works of the project or the organization seems to be well justified.
5 NETWORK PROJECT MANAGEMENT References [1]. Yukl, Gary, Rubina Mahsud, Shahidul Hassan, and Gregory E. Prussia. "An improved measure of ethical leadership."Journal of leadership & organizational studies20, no. 1 (2013): 38-48. [2]. Burke, Rory. "Project management: planning and control techniques."New Jersey, USA(2013). [3]. Parker, Marla, and Eric W. Welch. "Professional networks, science ability, and gender determinants of three types of leadership in academic science and engineering."The Leadership Quarterly24, no. 2 (2013): 332-348. [4]. Harrison, Frederick, and Dennis Lock.Advanced project management: a structured approach. Routledge, 2017. [5]. F. Vito, Gennaro, George E. Higgins, and Andrew S. Denney. "Transactional and transformational leadership: An examination of the leadership challenge model."Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management37, no. 4 (2014): 809-822. [6]. Remley, Theodore Phant, and Barbara Herlihy.Ethical, legal, and professional issues in counseling. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, 2014. [7]. Phillips, Joseph.PMP, Project Management Professional (Certification Study Guides). McGraw-Hill Osborne Media, 2013. [8]. Durkheim, Emile.Professional ethics and civic morals. Routledge, 2013. [9]. Wang, Danni, David A. Waldman, and Zhen Zhang. "A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness."Journal of applied psychology99, no. 2 (2014): 181. [10]. Kerzner, Harold, and Harold R. Kerzner.Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons, 2017.