Increasing Nitrogen Use Efficiency with Nitrification Inhibitors

This essay discusses the use of nitrification inhibitors to improve nitrogen use efficiency in agriculture. It covers the benefits and drawbacks of using these inhibitors and their impact on crop yield and fertilizer nitrogen recovery. The essay also explores the genetic basis of nitrogen use efficiency in crops and the potential for natural nitrification inhibitors. Subject: Agriculture, Course Code: N/A, Course Name: N/A, College/University: N/A

Running head: AGRICULTURE 1
Increasing nitrogen use efficiency with nitrification inhibitors
Name:
Institution Affiliation:

AGRICULTURE 2
Introduction
Nitrification inhibitors could possibly prevent conversion of the ammonium nitrogen to the
nitrate nitrogen via nitrifying the bacteria in the soil (Abalos et al 2014). Use of the inhibitor with
the ammonium or simply the ammonium forming fertilizers might restrict on the progression of
the nitrate which in contrast to ammonium, continues to be vulnerable to the loss from the soil
via leaching together with denitrification. There are several diverse substances that would inhibit
nitrification even though in relation to agricultural use certain are much more possible compared
to others (Alonso-Ayuso, Gabriel &Quemada, 2016). The outcomes from numerous fields of
experiments which cover variety of plants, soil kinds and cultivation methods reveal where
inhibitor utilize could be beneficial or just detrimental, with regards to the boost in the yield and
recovery of the fertilizer nitrogen by the crop ( Alonso-Ayuso , Gabriel &Quemada , 2016). The
commercial use of the inhibitors could possibly improve, due to the increase price of fertilizers,
regulation to limit nitrate inputs to the groundwater and nitrate concentration in the crops,
together with the increase use of fertilizers would be suitable to the application within the
inhibitors (Lam et al 2018). In this essay it would discuss on increasing nitrogen use efficiency
with nitrification inhibitors.
The use of the nitrification inhibitors continues to be an approach to improve the efficiency of
nitrogen in the agriculture systems (Alonso-Ayuso, Gabriel &Quemada , 2016 ). These types of
the chemical compounds on the holdup to the transformation of the ammonium to nitrate in the
soil depressing the activity of the nitrifiers bacteria (Ding et al 2015). Consequently , whenever
the fertilizers is pre-blended with the NI they might be provided and goal on this would be to
develop on the synchronization between the N supply and demand of the plant, enhancing on the
N utilize efficiency ( NUE ) and minimizing nitrate deficits (Lam et al 2018). In the various

AGRICULTURE 3
studies they have reported mitigation of the nitrous oxides emissions but when it comes to NUE
there is controversial. Without underestimating the ecological advantages, additionally it is vital
to deem economic expenses and profits of the NI use (Lam et al 2018). The prospects to
conserve N-fertilizer reduce on the variety of programs, or maybe boost in the productivity are
important and that might validate the higher price of the NI to the farmers as a viable option over
the conventional fertilizers (Lam et al 2018). Thus, verification of the cropping techniques or
perhaps the environmental conditions that NI improves NUE along with the yield in the crop
could contribute the ideal practice of the fertilizer technology.
Crop nitrogen use of efficiency
One definition of the N use efficiency to the cropping is the fraction of the N fertilizer that is
removed from the harvest crop biomass especially throughout the growing season to the ratio of
the crop yield per unit of the used N fertilizer (Wallace, 2016). With regards to practical
agriculture conditions, reduce NUE is related to the excessive N application amount, larger
spatial variability of elements managing NUE and the poor land management practices. The crop
yield usually increases with the increase in the plant N uptake (Wallace, 2016). This is based
with the law of the diminishing returns which increased plant N uptake and is associated to the
increased N supply (Ezzat, El-Awady& Ahmed, 2011). As a result of lack of the information,
farmers are unable to devise management techniques to improve their Nitrogen (N) practice to
large scale and estimate to amount of nitrogen fertilizers that are needed in order to improve on
the maximum NUE in the fields (Gilsanz, Báez, Misselbrook, Dhanoa& Cárdenas, 2016). It is
crucial to understand the contribution of the behaviors of the farmers to the current N application
practical issues.

AGRICULTURE 4
Nitrogen is regarded as the key inputs to increase in the agricultural productivity(Subbarao et al
2017). Prilled urea is the primary source of the nitrogen that is used on the soil. Urea nitrate
(NO-3). Whenever urea is used on the soil it will be hydrolyzed by the urease to form NH4 + and
subsequently developed to the nitrate NO- 3 via the action of nitrifying bacteria. The NO- 3 is
generally exposed to the losses either as the nitrogen gas or perhaps the nitrous oxide by the
action of denitrifying the bacteria and by percolation of the soil water. Extreme loss in the N due
to NO- 3 leaching might be an important problem with relation to the light textured soils,
specifically, during the course of the rainy season (Qiao, Liu, Hu, Compton, Greaver & Li,
2015). These results to very poor recovery of the used N that seldom supplies of N and develop
fertilizer utilize efficiency; there is certainly a necessity to manage the supply via reducing rate
of urea hydrolysis or perhaps nitrification.
In regard to this context, the slow release of the urea usually form sulphur coated urea, polymer
coated urea as well as urea super granules which has been widely investigated. There are
numerous chemical substances that retard hydrolysis that has already been tried (Nelson, 2017).
To have the ability to enhance the N-use performance of the crops, various synthetic chemicals
for example N-serve, sodium chlorate, and benzene hexachloride happen to be viewed for the
inhibition of the urea hydrolysis in the soils (Nelson, 2017). Many of these chemicalshave had
restriction to the experimental level due to their high cost, limited availability along with the
adverse effect they have on the beneficial soil microorganism (Nelson, 2017). Natural
nitrification inhibitors and nitrogen use efficiency
There has been experimentation done on the neem cake which has been coated with urea to
evaluate on the nitrogen use efficiency in India was initiated byRose et al (2018). Based on his
report it showed that there was 25-30% increase in the N recovery in the rice as a result of

AGRICULTURE 5
Neemcake coated urea (Lam et al 2018). Ever since Neem cake has been evaluated by various
employees both in the upland and the waterlogged condition, they developed various products by
extracting neem cake with ethanol and marketed as Nimin. They later reported an enhancement
of the apparent N recovery inhibitory features of the Karanj cake (Lam et al 2018). The research
has shown that its chemical fractionation showed enhancement in the N uptake and rice grain
protein content over the uncoated N source. Some of the other researches carried out have found
out that there is a higher nitrogen recovery to crop such as Mahua and castor which was treated
with urea and compared to the one not treated in wheat under the calcareous soil.
Deciphering the Genetic basis of nitrogen use efficiency in crops
There happen to be various studies that have been carried out on the model varieties of
Arabidopsis, in order to link the plant physiology to the whole genome expression to acquire an
incorporated look at with regards to exactly how genes might influence the overall plant
functioning (Rose et al 2018). At any time structural or even regulatory gene putatively is
involved in the control over the metabolic pathway or perhaps on the developmental practice ,
data might be obtained through producing over expressor or maybe choosing deficient mutants
of the gene in question( Wallace , 2016 ). It is accomplished by understanding the impact of the
genetic modification or even choosing mutation on phenotype or the physiology of the crop
(Wallace, 2016). It is likely you might decide whether an expression to a particular gene is the
limiting step to the progression of a specific organ or metabolic pathway. This method enables
identification of person decreasing impact, or even non limiting would not take into the
contemplation the various variations in the complex features for example regulating NUE, that
requires several genes and multiple enzyme reaction and regulatory factor.

AGRICULTURE 6
Currently, there have been few reports which have highlighted specific breeding to the organic
inputs system and particularly N (Wallace, 2016). An issue which could be addressed would be
regardless of whether or not the genetic control over the NUE under the organic or possibly
conventional fertilization conditions is a lot comparable or perhaps if perhaps there are several
genes or a combinations of the genes that are much more modified to one mode of the
fertilization as comparability to the other, contemplating organic material might be leased out
promptly up by the plant (Wallace, 2016). There is certainly much effort that is required to
identify whether other root, simply shoot enzymes or regulatory protein might perform a
particular role under the lower and the high N availability, in regardless of what the type of the N
fertilization conditions (Zhang et al 2015).
Conclusion
Soil N content has been as a result of the dynamic processes which include numerous elements.
Fertilization and land application to the natural wastes should offer N supply crops demand while
at the same time accounting to the existing residual soil N. nitrification inhibitors behavior as
well as persistence in the soil is determined by the diffusion into the atmosphere, differential
movement in the soils, or organic matter and the breakdown mechanism. The environmental and
the edaphic aspects, for instance, soil texture; temperature and moisture are the determinants
elements when it comes to understanding their behavior and the perspective in the soils. In this
essay, it has focused on increasing nitrogen use efficiency with the usage of nitrification
inhibitors.

AGRICULTURE 7
References
Abalos, D., Jeffery, S., Sanz-Cobena, A., Guardia, G., & Vallejo, A. (2014). Meta-analysis of the
effect of urease and nitrification inhibitors on crop productivity and nitrogen use
efficiency. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 189, 136-144.
Alonso-Ayuso, M., Gabriel, J. L., &Quemada, M. (2016). Nitrogen use efficiency and residual
effect of fertilizers with nitrification inhibitors. European journal of agronomy, 80, 1-8.
Coskun, D., Britto, D. T., Shi, W., & Kronzucker, H. J. (2017). Nitrogen transformations in
modern agriculture and the role of biological nitrification inhibition. Nature plants, 3(6), 17074.
Accessed At: https://cpb-ap-se2.wpmucdn.com/blogs.unimelb.edu.au/dist/3/262/files/2017/10/
nplants-1nqkx1p.pdf
Ding, W. X., Chen, Z. M., Yu, H. Y., Luo, J. F., Yoo, G. Y., Xiang, J., ...& Yuan, J. J. (2015).
Nitrous oxide emission and nitrogen use efficiency in response to nitrophosphate, N-(n-
butyl) thiophosphorictriamide and dicyandiamide of a wheat cultivated soil under sub-
humid monsoon conditions. Biogeosciences, 12(3), 803-815.
Ezzat, A. E. B. S., El-Awady, A. A., & Ahmed, H. M. (2011).Improving nitrogen utilization
efficiency by potato (Solanumtuberosum L.).Nat. Sci, 9, 34-42.
Gilsanz, C., Báez, D., Misselbrook, T. H., Dhanoa, M. S., & Cárdenas, L. M. (2016).
Development of emission factors and efficiency of two nitrification inhibitors, DCD and
DMPP. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 216, 1-8. Accessed At:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880915300943
Lam, S. K., Suter, H., Bai, M., Walker, C., Davies, R., Mosier, A. R., & Chen, D. (2018). Using
urease and nitrification inhibitors to decrease ammonia and nitrous oxide emissions and
improve productivity in a subtropical pasture. Science of the Total Environment, 644,
1531-1535.
Nelson, K. (2017). Management of nitrogen and nitrification inhibitors for corn and wheat
production on claypan soils (Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri--Columbia).
Rose, T. J., Wood, R. H., Rose, M. T., & Van Zwieten, L. (2018). A re-evaluation of the
agronomic effectiveness of the nitrification inhibitors DCD and DMPP and the urease
inhibitor NBPT.Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 252, 69-73.
Subbarao, G. V., Arango, J., Masahiro, K., Hooper, A. M., Yoshihashi, T., Ando, Y., ...& Peters,
M. (2017). Genetic mitigation strategies to tackle agricultural GHG emissions: The case
for biological nitrification inhibition technology. Plant Science, 262, 165-168.

AGRICULTURE 8
Qiao, C., Liu, L., Hu, S., Compton, J. E., Greaver, T. L., & Li, Q. (2015). How inhibiting
nitrification affects nitrogen cycle and reduces environmental impacts of anthropogenic
nitrogen input. Global Change Biology, 21(3), 1249-1257.
Wallace, A., Armstrong, R., Harris, R., Bellyaeva, O., Grace, P., & Scheer, C. (2016). Nitrous
oxide emissions from wheat grown in a medium rainfall environment in Se Australia are
low compared to overall nitrogen losses. Accessed at:
https://eprints.qut.edu.au/113119/1/INI2016_Wallace_Ashley.pdf
Zhang, M., Fan, C. H., Li, Q. L., Li, B., Zhu, Y. Y., &Xiong, Z. Q. (2015). A 2-yr field
assessment of the effects of chemical and biological nitrification inhibitors on nitrous
oxide emissions and nitrogen use efficiency in an intensively managed vegetable
cropping system. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 201, 43-50.