Nursing Research 2022

Running head: NURSING RESEARCH
NURSING RESEARCH
Name of the Student
Name of the university
Author’s note

NURSING RESEARCH1
1. Search strategy for literature to support the proposal
(P) Key terms and MESH terms
1. Nurses
2. Health Attendant
3. Caregivers
4. Carer
5. Nurses OR health workers OR Caregivers OR Carer
(I) Key terms and MESH terms
1. Electronic health records
2. Electronic prescription
3. Electronic medical records
4. e- documentation
5. Electronic health records OR HER OR Electronic medical records OR e-
documentation
(C) Key terms and MESH terms
1. Paper prescriptions
2. Paper documents
3. Medicine instruction
4. Paper prescriptions OR Paper documents OR Medicine instruction
(O) Key terms and MESH terms
1. Patient outcome
2. Patient expectation
3. satisfaction
4. Empowerment
5. Positive outcome OR Patient expectation OR satisfaction OR empowerment

NURSING RESEARCH2
Part A: Background research
1. PICO (Quantitative analytic studies )
Key terms Alternatives
How would you describe your patients or the patient group?
Patient or
population
Nurses Caregivers, carers
What intervention are you interested in?
Electronic health
record
Electronic medical
record
What alternative or different options do you want to compare your intervention to?
Comparison Paper prescription Paper health records
What measurable outcomes are you interested in?
Outcome Patient satisfaction Patient experience
2. PICO question
Does use of electronic health records (I) in clinical settings increases patient satisfaction (O) in
comparison to the paper prescriptions (C)?

NURSING RESEARCH3
Part B: Characteristics of Study Table
No. Article
reference
Countr
y
Participants Study type
and the
Methods
Main
results
/findings
Author’s
conclusion
1. Gildon, B.
L.,
Condren,
M., &
Hughes, C.
C. (2019,
June).
Impact of
Electronic
Health
Record
Systems on
Prescribing
Errors in
Pediatric
Clinics. In
Healthcare
(Vol. 7,
No. 2, p.
57).
Multidiscip
linary
Digital
Publishing
Institute.
USA 3 paediatric
clinics
representing
three
different
EHR systems
and practice
settings.
139
prescriptions
were
considered
A cross
sectional
descriptive
study
design,
quantitative
study
The
prescribing
error in
clinic 1 is
higher than
the two
clinics as it
did not
comply to
the AAP
(American
academy of
paediatrics )
requirements
The HER
system
present in the
clinics does
not meet the
requirements,
thus the
medication
error rates are
high
2. Maillet, É.,
Mathieu,
L., &
Sicotte, C.
(2015).
Modeling
factors
explaining
the
Canada Medical
surgical
wards of four
hospitals
ranked at
Quantitative
study, A
multicentre
cross
sectional
The
variables
explained
33.6% of the
variance of
The research
highlighted
the
importance of
effort