This nursing assignment explores the concepts of clinical reasoning, focused case analysis, and patient values. It discusses the art of clinical reasoning and the process of collecting data for differential diagnosis. It also examines the impact of value clash on data collection.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running Head: NURSING ASSIGNMENT Nursing Assignment Name Institution
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
NURSING ASSIGNMENT2 Nursing Assignment Question 1 Clinical Reasoning Clinical reasoning (CR) is a process in which nurses (plus other clinicians) collect cues, process the data collected, come to understanding of a patient or client problem or condition, plan and implement the appropriate interventions, assess outcomes, as well as reflect on plus learn from the reasoning process (Yazdani, Hosseinzadeh & Hosseini, 2017). Art of Clinical Reasoning Clinical reasoning is an art of a constant process, which does not end when the diagnosis has been performed on the patient. The process begins with the collection of data from the patient and reviewing the chart. The next stage will be for the clinicians to use their skills to distill the data collected into pertinent positive and negative findings followed by the creation of problem presentation regarding the relevant features of the positive and negative findings translated to appropriate medical terminology. The next process will be adopting a differential diagnosis framework, like the anatomic model, or physiologic model. The final process of CR is to apply the relevant positive and negative findings to a framework on the findings selected to generate the differential diagnosis (Yazdaniet al.,2017). Question 2a Focused case analysis is a general process of analysis through a diagnosis of a patient based on a specific case as presented at the clinical setting while complete analysis will entail the
NURSING ASSIGNMENT3 actual examination of both the history of the patient and physical examination. Both the focused case analysis and complete analysis is geared at collecting information from the patient for differential diagnosis. Question 2b The history of the present illness offers the original data to generate differential diagnosis towards identifying the medical problem of the patient. The effective interviewing process needs the clinician to avoid medical terminology and utilized a descriptive language, which is familiar to the patient. For those clinicians that favor mnemonics, the eight dimensions of a medical problem may easily be recalled utilizing OLDCARTS (Onset, Location, Duration, Character, Aggravating elements, Relieving elements, Timing, and Severity). This will entail the use of OLDCARTS during an interview to get an accurate history concerning the current illness of the patient. The content of the subsequent questions would rely both on what the clinician discovers and the knowledge base/understanding of the patient and the present disease that will dictate the success of the interview in promoting effective differential diagnosis (Alshenqeeti, 2014). Question 3a Patients’ inherent values make them believe that they are not worth living because of their current illness that affects their actions and perceptions regarding their value in life. These patients will feel that the illness make them be worthless and they consider being a burden to the society and their families. In many instances, their illness makes them to lose confidence and meaning of life (Kimmelman, 2012).
NURSING ASSIGNMENT4 Question 3 b My personal system is my act of caring where I just find myself assisting patients even not in my department. The act of caring just comes out voluntary and I find myself caring for people without my conscience (Kimmelman, 2012). Question 3c The potential value clash during the collection of data on the patient will affect the validity of the data collected. The clash will create an environment that will result in bias that will affect the accuracy and validity of the data collected. The patient may provide inaccurate information because of the class of the values during the interview session (Alshenqeeti, 2014).
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
NURSING ASSIGNMENT5 References Alshenqeeti, H. (2014). Interviewing as a Data Collection Method: A Critical Review. English ` Linguistics Research. 3(1):39-45. Kimmelman, J. (2012). Ethics, ambiguity aversion, and the review of complex translational clinical trials.Bioethics. 26(2):242–250. Yazdani, S., Hosseinzadeh, M., & Hosseini, F. (2017). Models of clinical reasoning with a focus on general practice: A critical review.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism,5(4):177–184.