1NURSING RESEARCH Answer 1: In quantitative studies, rigor is known to increase the quality of research performed in clinical settings by allowing a freedom from the biases most commonly governing various clinical studies. It is essential to understand the design of the clinical experiment and study correctly and for the researcher to evaluate any underlying factor for the observed outcome. Rigor is widespread in conditions of strict conduct, acceptance of specialty standards and logical interpretation are available. Unlike this quantitative study, rigor may extend to qualitative and descriptive studies as well. Quantitative studies examine the hypothesis described for the determinationofacorrelationbetweentheoutcomeandtheexposure.However,in descriptive studies, observation is based on the individual, location and time. Quantitative studies can be both observational such as case-control and cohort and controlled such as randomized control trials. Bias may be defined as trends in collecting, analyzing, interpreting, publishing and reviewing the information to outline conclusions which systematically differ from the reality (Marquart, 2017). Bias is referred to as a dichotomous variable and is not interpreted in a limited way of presence or absence. As it is a tendency, which obstructs unprejudiced conclusion of the question in this study, it is inherently present in this as well as nearly all the studies published influencing the conclusions of the study. Answer 2: Validity may be defines as the strength of the proposition, conclusion and inference of the study. Quantitative studies rely on collecting and analyzing the data presented in statistical formatindescribing,explaining,predictingandcontrollingthevariablesandthe phenomenon of desire. Similarly, this quantitative study provides scope for greater validity and as the outcomes of the study are measurable and can be broadly generalized (Watson, 2015). Validity of quantitative studies are fundamentally affected by the method of analytical
2NURSING RESEARCH research adopted such as experimental, quasi-experimental, descriptive or relationship-based. Validity of a study is determined by its four types, namely, conclusion validity, internal validity, construct validity and external validity. Conclusion validity aims to determine the relationship between the method and the outcome observed. Internal validity focuses on the causalrelationbetweenthestudyanditsoutcome.Constructvaliditydeterminesthe correlation between the operationalization of the concept and the causal relationship. Lastly, external validity aims at the capacity of the study to be generalized with respect to the setting and standards of study applied. Reliability, on the other hand, refers to the consistency or degree of accuracy of the measurement or the method implemented in measuring the outcome. In other words, it is a measure of the repeatability of a results of a study. In such studies, sample population is chosen by a suitable sampling procedure. In general, the minimal sample size of 30 is considered reliable. Sample sizes smaller than 30 are not reliableinmostofthecases.Moreover,largesamplesizesarehighlyreliableand generalizable which increases the validity of the study as well. In cases with considerable small sample sizes, the researchers should be particular of the quality of the limited data collected such that it can be generalized and provide sound validity (Heale & Twycross, 2015). Thus, in this study, validity is more significant than reliability as the instrument of measurement does not have an essential part in determining the result. Answer 3: Adherence to the intervention refers to the degree to which the researchers involve or experience with the content of the method proposed. It is an essential parameter and neglecting to assess and report compliance interferes with the interpretation and conclusion of the findings in the study. Compliance in quantitative studies has been reported as a consistent problem irrespective of the process or method of design used. Compliance or adherence has
3NURSING RESEARCH gained significant attentions in the past few years due to its profound impact that limited compliance has on the sample size of the study (Beintneret al., 2019).
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4NURSING RESEARCH References Beintner, I., Vollert, B., Zarski, A. C., Bolinski, F., Musiat, P., Görlich, D., ... & Jacobi, C. (2019). Adherence reporting in randomized controlled trials examining manualized multisession online interventions: Systematic review of practices and proposal for reporting standards.Journal of medical Internet research,21(8), e14181. Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies.Evidence- based nursing,18(3), 66-67. Marquart,F.(2017).Methodologicalrigorinquantitativeresearch.Theinternational encyclopedia of communication research methods, 1-9. Watson, R. (2015). Quantitative research.Nursing Standard,29(31).