Courtroom Observation Report

Running Head: OBSERVATION 1
Courtroom Observation Report
Name
Affiliation
Instructor
Date

Observation 2
Courtroom Observation Report
Neutrality
During my court observation, I was able to identify that the judge was fair in his statements
and judgments. He was open and understanding. This leads to satisfaction in both the
defendants and the plaintiffs. The most important aspect also included his act of equality
where he served the interests of all parties equally. This was despite their prejudices against
each other. For example, the judge gave sufficient time for all lawyers to prepare their
presentations well. During the entire process, he was able to also listen to the presentations
carefully, (McManus, 2018). Judges must master the art if listening carefully so that they can
grasp all the details of the case. In the court, the judge kept asking questions for purposes of
clarification and this is what pleased me. However, he was able to maintain a mean
demeanor the entire time hence showing that he meant business. This helps in setting the
mood of the courtroom and also indicates that serious matters are being handled.
Proceedings in the courtroom were also open, transparent and clear, (McLoughin, 2017).
This gave the accused an opportunity to understand all procedures and events easily. Lastly,
the judge was patient with all parties and treated them equally.
Respect
Respect is improtant in all careers. In the courtroom, the judge respected all people equally
and accorded them respectful treatment. The judge did not also identify the accused as
thieves, rapists or murderer. Similarly, decisions that were not clear were clarified by the