Office | Memorandum of Law | Assessment

Office memorandum of law.
To:
From:
Date:30th March 2016.
Case: Wong vs Constable Ambrose.
Office fill no:
Docket no:
Re:

Assessment of the assignment.
Wendy wong vs consolable ambrose.
You have asked me to prepare a memorandum involving the case between wendy wong and
ambrose .wong who decided to sue constable Mr Ambrose, who was a member of a police
officer, Wendy was suing ambrose for assault which took place on 30th March 2016 according to
the filled case. The defense of constable ambrose will depend on the evidence from the two
witnesses who were in the scene at the time Wong was claiming she was allegedly assaulted by
ambrose, and the two witnesses were senior constable Smythe and constable Jago.
The case that wong petition that there was also a financial loss when she assaulted, was ignored
because it was a minor claim.
The defendant requested that plaintiff is to go medical examination so that it can be
recommended and the report from the doctor there was no evidence found at the time that wendy
was claiming that she was assaulted, no injury at all and the only evidence viewed from the x-ray
taken on 2017 shows minor damage that was a fractured left cheekbone and a broken nose and

just small soft tissue injuries. According to the report from the doctor, these injuries were
persistent and had a history.
The case was filled to be heard in the county court of VIC court of NSW which is located on the
11 court locations outside of Melbourne which is across Victoria the locations are Bairnsdale,
Ballarat, Bendigo, Geelong, Horsham, Latrobe Valley (Morwell), Mildura, Shepparton,
Wangaratta, Warrnambool, and Wodonga (Henry & Powell, 2016.p.397-418).
As I am for the accused or defendant, I have the below submissions.
The defendant's case.
The internal disciplinary continued with the case and filed the lawsuit against constable ambrose
because of the complaint from wendy wong. An inspector had Wendy's matter and dismissed her
complains the inspector relied on the statement made because he never received any tangible
evidence. The inspector referred her judgment to a civil stand of proving applies by Birkinshaw
vs. Birkinshaw (1938)60 CLR 336. The evidence that Wendy tried to produce does not satisfy
beyond a reasonable doubt, so I will dismiss the case as I based my judgment on the civil stand
(Alimardani & Chin, 2019.p.255-270).
STATEMENT OF CONSTABLE ALBERT AMBROSE.
The accused is serving as a constable of police at MEADOWVALE police station who has been
serving a constable for the eighteen months. My client has the first contact with Wong on 1st
march 2018 which my client saw Wong driving an old ford falcon sedan in river road, this car
was extremely noisy and producing a lot of smoke from the exhaust, this car was not roadworthy.
Mr. Ambrose stopped Wong to inspect her vehicle, which was not roadworthy in many
approaches, and it was dangerous for her and other road users, and he told Wong that she could