Professional Values Ethics And Attitudes: Detailed facts of Olympus and Toshiba corporation scandals
Verified
Added on 2023/06/08
|13
|3388
|338
AI Summary
This article discusses the scandals of Olympus and Toshiba corporations, their stakeholders, and the ethical, accounting, legal, and corporate governance issues involved. It also provides recommendations for changes and improvements.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Professional Values Ethics And Attitudes1 PROFESSIONAL VALUES ETHICS AND ATTITUDES By (Student’s Name) Professor’s Name College Course Date
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Professional Values Ethics And Attitudes2 PROFESSIONAL VALUES ETHICS AND ATTITUDES Detailed facts of Olympus and Toshiba corporation scandals Olympus Corporation: Olympus Corporation famously known for its Cameras all over the world became a topic of discussion in 2011when it was exposed to the universe that the Company top executives had concealed losses of approximately 1.7 billion dollars. Ironically, the person who revealed this secrecy was the newly appointed CEO of non-Japanese origin known as Michael Woodford. Surprisingly this tendency of hiding the Company losses began in the year 1999. The Company tactics of hiding losses have been occurring for more than 10years; this was possible because the organization was capable of making superlative profits. However, a particular incident of the Enron paves the way for the use of new accounting techniques which was to be adopted by all Companies in the year 2017. This new method of accounting completely brought changes and improvement in the standard of accounting procedures being followed by then, and it became a major setback to the management’s ventures of covering up losses (Coney and Coney 2016 p.26). Soon, individuals that are at the forefront of such deplorable deeds came with an invention that they could use costs and fees associated with the organization acquiring the Gyrus, a firm from the British medical equipment and other three small firms from the Japanese as a place of hiding money. The management of Olympus Corporation paid a total of US2.2 for purchasing Gyrus, a Firm whose yearly earnings was 1 /10 of the consideration paid by Olympus in dollars. The amount paid by Olympus for the advisory of the acquisition was a total of US687 million.
Professional Values Ethics And Attitudes3 Immediately after the transaction, the Company acquired another three firms and spent a total of US773 for the purchase. The strength of the employees of the three firms acquired by Olympus was less than 50 each. The company Auditor during that time raised their concerns over the Firm’s financial dealing to the public that there is critical information the company never provided for their auditing work. This was the time when the company appointed Michael Woodford as the Company president. Michael came up with many altercations and deliberations with the Media over potential falsification of the company books of accounts. This made Michael appoint new auditors to check the books of accounts once again to trace any elements of suspicion or discrepancy (Utz 2018 p.25) Michael had to resign as the president of the Company after questioning the falsification of the books of account. Toshiba On December 2015, Tanaka who was the CEO of Toshiba announced his Resignation due to accountingscandalin which theorganizationoverstatedprofitsof approximately 151.8billion. This scandal also made eight other officials of the Company resign, including the other two previous Chief executive officers (CEO) who were still operating at the firm in different roles. The investigative board released a report describing the details of the scandals which primarily relate to corporate culture and lack of internal control driven to exaggerate profits. Improper accounting has been taking place in the company for seven years. Upon investigation, it was found that the company CEOs of Toshiba put pressure on the employee to meet the targets set on sales (Hoang 2018 p.24). The influence on the subordinates often came right before the end of fiscal or a quarter year, which pressed employees to bring forward sales. The top management of the company set impossible targets with the intention of meeting the sales target. They also relied on the corporate culture of the Japanese of loyalty and obedience
Professional Values Ethics And Attitudes4 that restrict individuals lower in the rank to do anything possible to meet the targets of the company. There are also manipulations of the accounts to achieve sales targets (Khondaker and Marc 2016 p.72). The investigative board also pointed to week internal control and corporate governance as the cause of the scandal. The corporate auditing department, internal control in the accounting and finance division and the risk management department did not operate properly to stop and identify the inappropriate behaviors. 2 Stakeholders involved and Affected in the scandal: Olympus Corporation The first stakeholder was Michael Woodford, the appointed president of the company; he was then sacked following this corporate scandal. Michael resigned as the CEO of the company because the Japanese institutional investor refused to support his bid. Olympus Corporation compromised their ethical and moral values, and this made its investors lose their faith and confidence in the organization (Askary 2017 p.102). This incident made the company board officials to convene a special meeting for the shareholders to act as a damage control mode. The second stakeholder is the Japanese media: the media in Japan exposed Woodford as someone who has mismanaged the organization. The media also claimed that Woodford was unable to adapt to the Japan working culture (Morris 2018 p.57). The third stakeholder is KPMG and Ernst and Young: This accounting firm also came under investigation for undertaking lawless activities of the organization for years. Different Lawyer criticized the reputation of KPMG and Ernst and Young. Toshiba Corporation
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Professional Values Ethics And Attitudes5 The top executives at Toshiba Corporation were found to be guilty of the accounting scandal that occurred in the company. They were involved in improper accounting practices and falsification of the books of accounts (Mehta and Bhavani 2017 p.10). Some of the Top executives involved in the scandal include 1) Tanaka, 2) Norio Sasaki who was the former president and Vice Chairman, and 3) former president and adviser Atsutoshi Nishida. These Top executives strongly pressured different departments in the organization in meeting and emails to meet budget targets as a cover-up of the losses that the company incurred. Masaaki Oosumi was also a stakeholder in the scandal. He resigned as the executive of the company after an independent board found that he participated in improper accounting practices at the organization’s television and PC businesses. Similarities between the two scandals The two cases were similar in their objectives of deceits and financial irregularities. The intentions and motives of the two scandals were identical in that they both cause losses to the public exchequer. In the case of Toshiba and Olympus, the Top executives have been recognized to be responsible for the improper accounting and fraudulent activities. They are similar in that the misdeeds and fraud originated at the top management in the organization and the officials accountable knew for sure that it was for their interest and not for public benefit. The media also played an essential role in all the two cases of scandals. The media exposed the accounting malpractices in all the two cases. It exposed to the public one disclosure to another in all the two cases.Olympus case, in which the top executives uncover losses of approximately US1.7 dollars, was named as the biggest fraud of all time. Similarly, the Toshiba case was also big such that the management arranged the meeting for the shareholders with the intention of covering up for the damages lost in the Company.
Professional Values Ethics And Attitudes6 Another similarity between Olympus and Toshiba is that there is manipulation of the books of accounttohidethecompanylosses.Inbothcases,theexecutivesandofficialsinthe organization knew that the organization was breaking the regulations and law relating to accounting standard. In the two cases, the people at the Top management tried to put their effort into evading the law. Ethical, Accounting, legal and Corporate Governance issue Issues involved and the way they occurred in: Olympus Corporation The ethical issue of deception and fraud with the organization was that the organization had tried to cover up losses amounting to US1.7 dollars with the Olympus’ acquisition activities. Michael Woodford began following the ethical course in the organization by sending letters to the compliance officers (Valentine and Fleischman 2008 p.45). His concerns were to inquire about the inflated acquiring value of the company properties. The top management also tried to sue the president of the company known as Woodford for leaking the confidential information of the company to the public. The legal issue of sly and guile on the part of the Board of directors was that the newly selected Chief executive officer was fired following his questioning as well as ultimately revealing to the unlawful public activities of the company. The accounting issue, in this case, was the misrepresentation of the book value of the Company investment. The Corporate governance issues in Olympus were that BOD did not perform as an independent team (Tsai 2015 p.122). The BOD was made up of 15 members, and twelve of them were the employees of the Olympus leading to a conflict of interest in the organization. The auditors of the Company also said that they had forwarded their concerns about the acquisitions processes, but the organization assumed them.
Professional Values Ethics And Attitudes7 Toshiba Corporation The ethical issues involved were disloyalty, dishonesty and unethical culture. This is because the top officials engaged in corrupt deals such as hiding of losses to meet their sale targets (Doyle, Miller and Mirza 2009 p.26). The culture promoted by the top management is unethical because it encourages corruption and criminal activities in the organization.The accounting issues that affect Toshiba include cookie jar and no disclosure. The company top officials engaged in fraudulent accounting through their subordinates and junior employees. The Cooperate governance issues involved in Toshiba are the issues of utilitarianism and practice of shaky internal control. Another corporate governance issue in Toshiba was that the top officials engaged in illegal activities in that they collaborate with the auditing firm to hide the financial information the business (Bogle 2018 p.67). They also promoted and encouraged bribery in the organizationformorethantenyears.ToshibaCorporationcarriedoutaninappropriate accounting standard which leads to the reduction of the company pretax income. The Legal issue involved in Toshiba Company is that the top officials misinterpret the financial information of the business (Elam, Barrera and Jackson, 2016 p.30) Comparison with Enron Olympus Corporation and Enron There appears to be a linkage in the financial irregularities in what occurred in Olympus and Enron. The top executives of both the companies had complete knowledge that the model of a corrupt business deal which they were creating was unreliable and shaky. The top officials in both Olympus and Enron were also being helped by their audit firms which covered up their financialirregularities.TheauditorofEnronknownasAndersenbythenwasdeclared dissolution. While the auditor in Olympus came under criticism for not revealing the firm’s
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Professional Values Ethics And Attitudes8 hiding losses for a decade, the differences between Olympus and Enron are that the CEO exposed the accounting fraud in Olympus by the name Woodford. The event of the Olympus was an outcome of Enron exposure. The Enron scandal brought up tougher rules and regulation. It also brought the tougher method of the accounting system to companies. Toshiba and Enron In both cases, the similarity was that these companies had accounting irregularities. Both the two firms engaged in fraudulent accounting practices. The auditors at Enron admitted to manipulating the accounts of the organization. In the case of Toshiba, the accounting problems arise due to understating of cost by the employees of the company (Aizawa 2018 p.74). This enabled the organization to cover up losses by overstating operating profit. Another similarity is that the top executives are the fraud makers in both the two companies.The CEOs of Toshiba put strong pressure on lower officials and subordinates to meet their sales target. The differences in the two cases of the scandal are that they both took place at a different time of the year (Lehmberg and Hicks 2018 p.63). Recommendation for changes and improvements Recommendation for: Legislation:The legislative body of the two countries should develop procedures of enacting tougher penalties and laws against malpractices as well as mismanagement of the company books of accounts. The legislation should also specify possible penalties to companies that did not meet the requirements on deadlines and laws. The legislative body should also ensure that there is the implementation of higher standards of ethics and morals for financial experts especially on audit committee (Strauss, Lepoutre and Wood 2017 p.65). The legislation
Professional Values Ethics And Attitudes9 should necessitate that the companies should have senior management responsible for signing a code of ethical conduct. These officials should affirm their faith on agency duties and financial reporting obligations while overseeing the assets of the corporation. An independent body should also be put in place to handle the grievance of workers. The government should establish a committee to oversee the functioning of the organizations to ensure that they operate the business according to the set laws and regulations. The companies should also submit their report which should be made public to attract the investors. Accounting standards:The employees should be given a chance to voice their concerns and grievances over any issue. Such a mechanism should incorporate the orientation and training of the employees. A restriction that governs the appointment of tax partner and engagement officer from the external auditors should be put in place in the organization. Financial reporting of the organization should be modernized to establish the practice of management analysis and discussion (Visser 2017 p. 130). The company should also train and educate members of the audit committee on the ethical issues of their profession. The government should appoint an independent external body to oversee the operation of the organizations. Codes of conduct:this is more than IC process with administrative and financial requirements; they tend to show agency’s value as well as philosophy. It also shows how the organization planned to operate its business. The company should encourage whistleblowing, lower discretionary power and develop stronger ethical guideline. The company should also establish the committee of independent directors to undertake the appraisal of the company’s performance (Wright and Nyberg 2017 p.125). The company should provide a detailed report on current best practices and corporate governance practices. The upgrade and revised financial
Professional Values Ethics And Attitudes10 code of conduct should restrict the financial executives to accept their duties in writing to encourage and promote ethical behavior in the organization.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Professional Values Ethics And Attitudes11 References Aizawa, A., 2018. Snow Brand Milk crossed the divide between institutional and competitive isomorphism.Annals of Business Administrative Science,17(4), pp.171-182. Askary, S., 2017. Can Accounting Regimes Protect the Public Interests?.Middle East Review of Public Administration (MERPA),3(3), p.2756. Bogle,J.C.,2018.TheModernCorporationandthePublicInterest.FinancialAnalysts Journal,74(3), pp.1-10. Coney, P. and Coney, C., 2016. The Whistleblower Protection Act (Japan) 2004: a critical and comparative analysis of corporate malfeasance in Japan.Monash UL Rev.,42, p.41. Dewan, S. and Ronconi, L., 2018. US Free Trade Agreements and Enforcement of Labor Law in Latin America.Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society,57(1), pp.35-56. Doyle, O.Z., Miller, S.E. and Mirza, F.Y., 2009. Ethical decision-making in social work: Exploring personal and professional values.Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics,6(1), pp.1-36. Elam, D., de Barrera, M.M. and Jackson, M., 2016. Olympus Imaging Fraud Scandal: A Case Study.American Journal of Business Education (Online),9(1), p.15. Hoang, T., 2018. The Role of the Integrated Reporting in Raising Awareness of Environmental, SocialandCorporateGovernance(ESG)Performance.InStakeholders,Governanceand Responsibility(pp. 47-69). Emerald Publishing Limited. Khondaker, R. and Marc, B., 2016. Accounting Irregularities at Toshiba: An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Problem and Its Impact on Corporate Governance in Japan.Global Advanced Research Journal of Management and Business Studies,5(4), pp.88-101.
Professional Values Ethics And Attitudes12 Lehmberg, D. and Hicks, J., 2018. A ‘glocalization’approach to the internationalizing of crisis communication.Business Horizons,61(3), pp.357-366. Mehta, A. and Bhavani, G., 2017. Application of forensic tools to detect fraud: The case of Toshiba.Journal of Forensic and Investigative Accounting,9(1), pp.692-710. Morris, N., 2018. Developing a Sustainable Legal System for the Belt and Road Initiative. InNormative Readings of the Belt and Road Initiative(pp. 43-58). Springer, Cham. Strauss, K., Lepoutre, J. and Wood, G., 2017. Fifty shades of green: How microfoundations of sustainabilitydynamiccapabilitiesvaryacrossorganizationalcontexts.Journalof Organizational Behavior,38(9), pp.1338-1355. Susanto,Y.K.andPradipta,A.,2016.Corporategovernanceandrealearnings management.International Journal of Business, Economics and Law,9(1), pp.17-23. Tsai, C.H., 2015. The Failure of Corporate Internal Controls and Internal Information Sharing: A Conceptual Framework for Taiwan.Hong Kong LJ,45, p.469. Utz, S., 2018. Corporate scandals and the reliability of ESG assessments: evidence from an international sample.Review of Managerial Science, pp.1-29. Valentine,S.andFleischman,G.,2008.Professionalethicalstandards,corporatesocial responsibility, and the perceived role of ethics and social responsibility.Journal of Business Ethics,82(3), pp.657-666. Vanhala, L., 2018. Is legal mobilization for the birds? Legal opportunity structures and environmental nongovernmental organizations in the United Kingdom, France, Finland, and Italy.Comparative Political Studies,51(3), pp.380-412. Visser, M.A., 2017. A floor to exploitation? Social economy organizations at the edge of a restructuring economy.Work, employment and society,31(5), pp.782-799.
Professional Values Ethics And Attitudes13 Wright, C. and Nyberg, D., 2017. An inconvenient truth: How organizations translate climate change into business as usual.Academy of Management Journal,60(5), pp.1633-1661.