University Signage Project Proposal

This assignment outlines a proposal for a university signage project. It includes a breakdown of project activities such as removing old signage, selecting a theme, implementing sign boards, and integrating digital displays. The document also presents a detailed budget for the project, totaling $94,000, and specifies funding requirements for each activity. Additionally, it briefly touches upon vendor selection processes.

Running head: CASE STUDY: OUR LANGUAGE IS IMPORTANT
Case Study- Our language is important
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author’s Note

1
CASE STUDY: OUR LANGUAGE IS IMPORTANT
Table of Contents
1. Risk Register................................................................................................................................3
2. Cost Baseline...............................................................................................................................5
2.1 Funding requirements............................................................................................................6
Bibliography....................................................................................................................................7

2
CASE STUDY: OUR LANGUAGE IS IMPORTANT
1. Risk Register
PROJECT RISK & OPPORTUNITY REGISTER
Risk / Opportunity
Identification Risk & Opportunity Analysis
Post Treatment
Risk &
Opportunity
Analysis
N
u
m
b
e
r
D
a
t
e
L
o
g
g
e
d
R
a
is
e
d
B
y
S
t
a
t
u
s
Ty
pe
Descr
iption
(Caus
e/Eve
nt/Eff
ect)
P
ro
xi
m
it
y
C
at
eg
or
y
Li
ke
li
ho
od
Co
nse
qu
en
ce
L
ev
el
(p
re
tr
ea
t
m
en
t)
T
re
at
m
en
t
R
es
po
ns
e
Tre
at
me
nt
T
re
at
m
en
t
U
p
da
te
O
w
n
e
r
Re
sid
ua
l
Im
pa
ct
Li
ke
li
ho
od
(p
os
t
tr
ea
t
m
en
t)
Co
nse
qu
en
ce
(po
st
tre
at
me
nt)
L
ev
el
(p
os
t
tr
ea
t
m
en
t)
1
3
.
9
.
1
7
T
e
a
m
L
e
a
d
e
r,
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
a
n
d
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
O
w
n
e
r
A
c
t
i
v
e
Th
re
at
The
prom
otion
of the
traditi
onal
langu
ages
are
not
done
prope
rly
and as
a
result
the
peopl
e do
not
have
prope
r
infor
matio
n as
well
as
knowl
edge
about
the
camp
aign
1.
9.
1
7
Im
pr
op
er
pr
o
m
oti
on
Li
ke
ly
Ma
jor
Hi
gh
R
ed
uc
e
Pro
per
awa
ren
ess
ca
mp
aig
n
mu
st
be
arra
nge
d so
that
the
peo
ple
hav
e
info
rma
tion
or
kno
wle
dge
abo
ut
the
proj
ect
that
is
und
erta
ken
for
pro
mot
ing
the
trad
itio
nal
lan
gua
ges
16
.2.
18
P
ro
je
ct
M
a
n
a
g
er
cre
ate
s
im
pa
ct
on
the
pr
oje
ct
Po
ssi
bl
e
Cri
tic
al
Hi
gh
2
8
.
9
.
1
P
r
o
j
e
A
c
t
i
v
Th
re
at
Due
to
scarci
ty of
budge
4.
9.
1
7
Im
pr
op
er
pr
Po
ssi
bl
e
Ma
jor
Hi
gh
R
ed
uc
e
Pro
per
bud
get
esti
19
.2.
18
E
x
e
c
ut
Cr
eat
es
ma
jor
Po
ssi
bl
e
crit
ica
l
hi
gh

3
CASE STUDY: OUR LANGUAGE IS IMPORTANT
7
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
e
t the
projec
t
mana
ger
are
unabl
e to
hire
more
numb
er of
emplo
yees
for
compl
eting
the
projec
t
succe
ssfull
y
before
estim
ated
time
es
en
ce
of
re
so
ur
ce
s
mat
ion
mu
st
be
don
e
by
ana
lyzi
ng
the
proj
ect
nee
ds
pro
perl
y.
In
add
itio
n to
this
,
the
exp
erie
nce
d
proj
ect
ma
nag
ers
mu
st
ana
lyz
e
the
mar
ket
pro
perl
y to
get
an
ide
a
abo
ut
the
cost
s.
iv
e
S
p
o
n
s
or
im
pa
ct
on
the
su
cc
ess
of
the
pr
oje
ct
3 1
5
.
9
.
1
7
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
S
p
o
n
s
o
r
A
c
t
i
v
e
O
pp
ort
un
ity
The
CQU
univer
sity
set an
effecti
ve
align
ment
with
the
NAID
OC
for
creati
ng a
camp
aign
that
would
be
helpfu
l in
W
ee
k
be
fo
re
St
ak
eh
ol
de
r
po
ssi
bl
e
Mo
der
ate
M
ed
iu
m
E
xp
loi
t
The
uni
ver
sity
mu
st
utili
ze
inn
ova
tive
tec
hni
que
of
co
mm
uni
cati
on
in
spit
e of
21
.2.
18
P
ro
je
ct
M
a
n
a
g
er
it
pr
ovi
de
s
nu
mb
er
of
op
po
rtu
nit
ies
to
oth
er
gr
ou
p
of
sta
ke
U
nli
ke
ly
Mo
der
ate
L
o
w

4
CASE STUDY: OUR LANGUAGE IS IMPORTANT
prom
oting
the
differ
ent
langu
ages
that
were
used
traditi
onally
.
taki
ng
sup
port
of
ca
mp
aig
n
for
pro
mot
ing
the
trad
itio
nal
lan
gua
ges
hol
der
s

5
CASE STUDY: OUR LANGUAGE IS IMPORTANT
2. Cost Baseline
WBS Task Name Jan Feb March April May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1 Initiation of project
plan
2 Designing sign board
2.1 Determination of
content $ 1,300.00
2.2 Develop project plan $ 700.00
2.3 Development of project
scope $ 1,200.00
2.4 Approval of the project $ 7,000.00
2.5 Reviewing changes
within project $ 540.00 $ 800.00 $ 900.00
2.6 Identification of the
project changes $ 460.00 $ 1,200.00
3 Printing the signage
boards
3.1 Finding of proper
project theme $ 1,210.00 $ 1,760.00 $ 1,290.00
3.2 Vendor selection $ 25,000.00
3.3
Collecting proper
information about
vendor
3.4 Attachment of
appropriate model $ 15,000.00 $ 1,245.00 $ 1,245.00
4
Taking permission for
removing earlier sign
boards
$ 1,700.00
4.1 Removing the earlier
sign board $ 8,100.00
4.2
Reviewing the
significance of sign
board
$ 2,000.00
5
Implementing the sign
board with appropriate
information
$ 3,730.00 $ 5,270.00
5.1 Finding new
information $ 200.00 $ 2,000.00
5.2 Putting the information
properly $ 4,560.00
5.3 Checking the quality $ 5,000.00
5.4 Documentation $ 3,000.00
Total 15000 8540 800 900 460 1200 0 1300 3110 49490 14365 1245
Cumulative total 15000 23540 24340 25240 25700 26900 26900 28200 31310 80800 95165 96410

6
CASE STUDY: OUR LANGUAGE IS IMPORTANT
2.1 Funding requirements
The funding requirements of the project are mainly elaborated below:
Activities Funding required
old signage removal from the
university
$14,00
Finding appropriate theme for the
project
$16,00
Implementation of appropriate sign
board
$15,00
Fixing entire information on the
signage board
$12,00
Attaching appropriate model for
digital display
$18,00
selection of appropriate vendors $19,00
Total $94,00

7
CASE STUDY: OUR LANGUAGE IS IMPORTANT
Bibliography
Burke, R. (2013). Project management: planning and control techniques.New Jersey, USA.
Cooke, J.L., (2016). PRINCE2 Agile: an implementation pocket guide: step-by-step advice
for every project type.
Davis, K. (2014). Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project
success. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 189-201.
Eric Kirkland, C. (2014). Project Management: A Problem-Based Approach. Project
Management Journal, 45(1), e3-e3.
Karaman, E. and Kurt, M., (2015). Comparison of project management methodologies:
prince 2 versus PMBOK for it projects. Int. Journal of Applied Sciences and
Engineering Research, 4(5), pp.657-664.
Kerzner, H. R. (2013). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling,
and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
Kerzner, H. (2013). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and
controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
Lianying, Z., Jing, H., & Xinxing, Z. (2012). The project management maturity model and
application based on PRINCE2. Procedia Engineering, 29, 3691-3697.
Maier, E., & Branzei, O. (2014). “On time and on budget”: Harnessing creativity in large
scale projects.International Journal Of Project Management, 32(7), 1123-1133.
Matos, S., & Lopes, E. (2013). Prince2 or PMBOK–a question of choice. Procedia
Technology, 9, 787-794.