Ask a question from expert

Ask now

Organisational Analysis Assignment

8 Pages2466 Words568 Views
   

Added on  2019-09-30

Organisational Analysis Assignment

   Added on 2019-09-30

BookmarkShareRelated Documents
Organisational Analysis Assignment 1Student Name:Student ID:
Organisational Analysis Assignment_1
Organisational Analysis Assignment 1Given Paper 1Question1In the works of Tata and Prasad (2015) it has been found that Organizations are implementing sustainability initiatives in different countries with varied socio-cultural systems. The literature on sustainability, however, does not present a clear picture of how national culture can influence interpretations of the meaning of sustainability and how these differences in interpretation can result in different sustainability practices. This is one of the major reasons for undertaking such research.The author has clearly demonstrated that there is a strong relationship amid organizational sustainability initiatives and national cultural values.2Using the critical analysis of the literature on the subject, the authors have very well examined and researched on the culture as well as sustainability practices that are conducted by organizations and thereby develops a theoretical model therebyidentifying the ways in which the cultural values influence the initiatives of the organizations towards sustainability. The author has identified a number of propositions that explicitly specifies the relationship among the constructs as well as the guidelines that are significantly provided to test the model.The author has used a review mechanism and practical approach towards researching the models that define and illustrates the relationship between culture and sustainability. The better the culture, the greater are the prospects for sustainability. The conclusions of the author are not opened for the challenge in futureresearch because the author has already made assumptions based on the subject of the research. Thus, though there is scope for future research, however, the conclusions of the author cannot be challenged, but form a foundation for the future researchers. 3The fundamental idea is the cultural expectations, social, legal system, concept of such system that once becomes accepted by people in terms of the social facts, thereafter, it has been considered to have strong power to restrain as well as to regulate behaviour of individuals or group. The rationale that best match with the concept as presented by Hirschheim and Klein (1989) is that information system development involves the number of explicit and implicit assumptions about the nature of human organizations, the nature of the design task, as well as the things thatare expected of them. Based on the assumptions that are adopted, diverse systems development approach can become recognizable as well as distinguishable, which as aresult, each of these might lead to dissimilar system outcomes. Tata and Prasad (2015) presented their view with respect to the impact of socio-cultural values illustrating the way in which diverse assumptions with regard to systems development become apparent in practice. The author has significantly constructed the matters with reference to the fact that there are regular patterns that are followed or general laws, which helps to explain as well as predict the realities. As the author Hirschheim and Klein (1989) pursues to capture the paradigms and assumptions altogether by means of recognizing and classifying the key organizational relationships along with the aspects in the concerned information system development that enables the performers to position themselves and thus, attain theirobjectives. The scholars Tata and Prasad (2015) in their work argue that none of the individuals have a privileged source of knowledge, they all see through their own pointof view concerning different parts. In addition to this, the role of people towards shaping reality has been considered to remain indistinct. What they subjectively
Organisational Analysis Assignment_2
Organisational Analysis Assignment 1experience as a willful choice of action may simply be a reaction induced by enculturated habits or by circumstances. The 2-story method of Hirschheim and Klein (1989) for analyzing the information system development within the boundaries of legitimacy, perceptions andfour paradigms construe the rationale behind the research. The four paradigms used in the research was functionalism which involved structured analysis and information engineering, Social Relativism involving Ethnographic approaches and FLORENCE project, Radical Structuralism such as trade union-led approach, UTOPIA and Neohumanism embracing critical social theory and SAMPO project.The inventiveness of the system developers matters the most while working on practical projects. This example is given using four paradigms. However, on the other hand, the rationale presented by Tata and Prasad (2015) provides a clear picture with regard to the legitimacy perceptions of organizations that national culture can influence interpretations of the meaning of sustainability as well as such differences in interpretation might also result in difference in the sustainability practices.
Organisational Analysis Assignment_3

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Organizational Analysis Assignment 1
|8
|2285
|99

National cultural values, sustainability beliefs, and organizational initiative
|9
|2831
|76

Organizational Analysis
|13
|2597
|43

Organisational Analysis Assignment 1
|5
|2142
|56

Organisational Analysis Assignment 1
|7
|2386
|65

Organisational Analysis Assignment 1
|6
|2488
|21