1ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction......................................................................................................................................3 2.0 Discussion........................................................................................................................................3 2.1 In-depth and clear analysis of the problems and opportunities of change strategy.....................3 2.1.1 Problems...............................................................................................................................4 2.1.2 Opportunities........................................................................................................................5 2.1.3 Kotter’s 8 step Model of Change..........................................................................................6 2.1.4 The McKinsey 7-S Change Framework...............................................................................8 2.2 Justification for a change strategy...............................................................................................9 2.2.1 Leadership change strategy.................................................................................................10 2.2.2 Technological change strategies.........................................................................................10 2.2.3 Communication strategies..................................................................................................11 2.3 Analysis of the issues and barriers.............................................................................................12 2.3.1 Issues and Barriers..............................................................................................................12 2.3.2 Contingency plan to overcome the issues and barriers.......................................................13 2.4 Analysis of the ethical issues implied........................................................................................14 2.4.1 Missing some important aspects.........................................................................................14 2.4.2 Transparency of sharing organizational values..................................................................14 2.4.3 Representation wrong data to the stakeholders..................................................................15
2ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT 3.0 Conclusion.....................................................................................................................................15 4.0 Reference List and Bibliography...................................................................................................17
3ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT 1.0 Introduction Thisbusinessreporthighlightsin-depthandclearanalysisoftheproblemsand opportunities,justificationforachangestrategy,analysisoftheissuesandbarriersfor implementing the proposed change management plan along with ethical issues implied from the Case Study followed with strategies to address those issues and evaluating of the planned change management objectives.The two change strategy selected for the assignment are Kotter’s 8 step Model of Change and McKinsey 7-S Change Framework, which will be help the organization to lead change for attaining competitive advantage, forecasting the process change, measuring results, increasing confidence and reducing resistance to the existing system. 2.0 Discussion 2.1 In-depth and clear analysis of the problems and opportunities of change strategy Goetsch and Davis (2014) stated that when an organization implements tools and techniques for bringing suitable changes to the process of the organization for fulfilling the recent demand of the market and customers is known as change management. In some cases, changes are included in the company for re-structuring the managerial approaches; while, in some of the cases in order to meet the standardized methods and procedures comparative to the ongoing market principles (Cameron and Green 2015). Hayes (2014) on the other hand argued that change management leads to the problem of adopting the implemented changes among the employees; require more capital resources and choosing wrong change management solution. Van der Voet (2014) in this case presented a counterargument that, effective change management results in ease in tension and also lead to greater smooth process.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT 2.1.1 Problems The concerned organization, University of Hard Knocks (UHK) taken initiative for combining regional Institute of Technology (IT) and a college of advanced education (CAE) and also utilized the reputation of the former IT department, formulating new trendy course for attracting international students and developing low cost accommodation for those students. However, the organization faced several drawbacks like declination in number of local students due to structural changes to the local economy, assault by drunken local youths on international students for taking jobs from locals. The organization also faced problem in sharing the knowledge from one department to the other and the management system in the organization is also centralized that do not allow the lower staff to participate in the decision making sessions. Moreover, there are some ethical issues occurred in the organization that hiring of casual staffs for the work of giving education to Arts/Business students, providing pass certificates to the students in spite of failing grades, gender discrimination working environment, unresponsive nature of the HR and improper transparency of sharing organizational values and beliefs with the stakeholders. 2.1.2 Opportunities The opportunities that University of Hard Knocks can be attained by implementing the change management strategy is an effective working environment utilizing a de-centralized approach where staffs can share their concern directly to the managing authority (Pullen and Rhodes 2015). Another opportunity that can be obtained through the change management is HR should be more responsible towards their responsibility that is to hire educated and efficient teachers, diminishing gender discrimination and increasing transparency in the university (Van der Voet 2014). Lastly, University of Hard Knocks will be benefited by the opportunity that is
5ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT efficient teachers will judge the paper of the student effectively and will not provide then pass certifications even if the student get poor marks. 2.1.3 Kotter’s 8 step Model of Change Image: Kotter’s 8 step Model of Change (Source: Appelbaumet al.2012) Creating an Urgency- Appelbaum et al. (2012) stated that this step highlights the potential threats and the repercussions and examining the opportunities with the involvement of the stakeholdersoftheorganization.Issuesofcentralizedstructureofthemanagementand corruption among the teaching staffs are identifiedand it diminishes the organizational culture and reputation of the university. Forming Guiding Coalitions- UHK should target the administrative people for initiating the changes of adopting transformational nature among them.This will help the university to make thecommunicationapproachtransparentamongthemanagementpeopleand allowstrict
6ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT regulation for the paper assessment helps in diminishing the corruption in the university regarding provision for wrong pass certificates. Developing Vision and strategy-This aspects helps in identifying thatUniversity should implement effective communication media and regulation for knowledge sharing to overcome theproblemoforganizationalsilos;whereas,changesintheorganizationalpoliciesand development of transformational leadership skills should be implemented to overcome the challenge of centralized nature of the management. CommunicatingtheVision-Hornstein(2015)statedthatthisphaseemphasizedon communicating the requirement of the change and convince the stakeholder regarding the change implemented.Thus it is identified thatUniversity of Hard Knocks can use traditional media sources like office notice boards and news bulletins to update about the changes to the staffs. Conventional media like e-mails and group chats can also be utilized for communicating the change vision. Removing Obstacles-This step helps UHK to identifychallenges like incompetency of the employees to adopt the change and improper utilization of the tools brought in the system and also implements the rewarding system for adopting the change more quickly (Larkin, Bernardi and Bosco 2012). Formulating Short-Term goals- Thus, this part of the strategy helps University of Hard Knocks (UHK) to implement approaches like technological changes for effective communication and develop partnership with the local governing bodies and education minster for developing regulation for the University for diminishing corruption in the assessing examination papers (Fugate, Prussia and Kinicki 2012).
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT Consolidating Gains-This part of the strategy helpsUHKto identify the approach ofassessing those employees, who are performing well during the change process so that their success stories can be shared with the other people (Burke 2017). Anchoring Change- University of Hard Knocks (UHK) should list down the immediate and associated advantages of incorporating knowledge sharing culture along with development of transformational customs (Doherty, Horne and Wootton 2014). 2.1.4 The McKinsey 7-S Change Framework Image: McKinsey 7-S Change Framework (Source: Dohertyet al.2014) Strategy-This step thus help UHK to considerapproaches like developing university’s social chat portal where stakeholder from different department can share their concern and progress with others (Alvesson and Sveningsson 2015). Another strategy like making leaders aware of the benefits of the transformational style can be implemented for enhancing the collaborative culture in the organization.
8ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT Structure- In this case, the approach for developing de-centralized culture can be incorporated so that all the stakeholders can give suggestion in the decision making session for developing effective strategies (Booth 2015).This can be dome through removing the hierarchy between the staffs and the top level management and other strategy is to empowering the decision making ability of the Science, Education and a combined Arts/Business Faculty. System-Thus, this steps help in identifying the strategy ofpreparing the checklist based on daily analyses, weekly analysis and monthly analysis to evaluate whether or not the staffs are meeting their job responsibilities.The checklist should also evaluate whether the regulation developed by the education governing authority are fulfilled by the staffs (Dale and Latham 2015). Shared values- The transformational culture suggested to be implemented in the organization helps in developing the sense of holding shared value among the people of UHK. Style-UHK should implement transformational leadership style for adopting the changes which will allow the leaders to identify other opportunities like designing selection process of the merit students, valuing curricular activities of the students during the admissions to enhance the culture of the organization (Doppelt 2017). Skills- The utilization of the communication skills, technological knowledge of the newly introduced information systemis identified in this aspectfor implementing change in UHK. Staffs- The employees of the UHKare allowed to take decision which is identified in this step for diminishing the centralized structure of the organization.Strategy of proper training is also identified to adopt the change so that staffs cannot face any problem (Gorran Farkas 2013).
9ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT 2.2 Justification for a change strategy 2.2.1 Leadership change strategy The leadership strategies for the University of Hard Knocks (UHK) should incorporate participative strategies.Top management of the company need to provide the power of decision making ability of the staffs to suggest whet is required for the betterment of their respective department (Hornstein 2015).Alvesson and Sveningsson (2015) stated that in this case, the leader should listen about the problem that the followers are facing and then try to implement changes that diminishes those problems.UHK should also take help of outside consultants and experts to develop this participative strategy as they can utilize their knowledge base and develop effective strategies and regulations by analyzing existing organizational culture. These outside consultants should be from governing institutions and education ministry as they regulate the education system (Michaelsonet al. 2014). Justification for leadership change strategy This suggestion is justified as external experts always take unbiased decisions for developing approaches. Moreover they can suggest the leaders on how to adopt transformational changes as they know how leaders behave globally and for the development of the regulations, university staff started performing ethically. 2.2.2 Technological change strategies UHK can implement traditional and conventional mode of the communication tools for knowledge sharing.In order todiminish the organizational silos, UHK should share the change planning with their staffs through e-mails, office chat portal and social media group.The
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
10ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT formulation of the checklist should also be present in the database which will help to monitor the performance progress of the staffs. Justification for implementing technological change strategies Themethodofimplementingthetechnologicalchangesisjustifiedbecausethe management people can share the knowledge irrespective of their geographical locations. The performance evaluation through the technology implemented also provides the accurate and unbiased result, which also help the organization to identify which staff follows the regulation. 2.2.3 Communication strategies Grunig (2013) stated that in order make the change implemented in the organization without creating any chaos in the organization, it is recommend for the management people to communicate with all the stakeholders from the initial times. UHK can initiate this step by making people aware of the facts that changes are planned to be implemented and it is better to specify the area in which major changes is planned to be incorporated (Sharif and Scandura 2014). Moreover, the official of the university alsoimplement feedback systemfrom the staffs whether or not they face difficulty in accepting the changes.Regular presentation session, conferences and group discussion and meetingscan also be conducted for making the staffs realized that the organization is in need to adopt these listed changes (Doppelt 2017). Justification for implementing communication strategies This approach is justified as organization here maintains transparency in the organization and staffs can also develop the sense of being valued from this strategy. Moreover, the staffs can start taking the business requirement of the university more seriously and suggest valuable suggestion that can improve the functionalities of the UHK University.
11ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT 2.3 Analysis of the issues and barriers 2.3.1 Issues and Barriers Lack ofConsensus Some of the staffs might not agree with the implemented changesand the main reason for not agreeing on the change management is that these employee do not always interested to learn new things as it hampers their time during the office hours and this problem is witnessed especially among aged people (Schnackenberg and Tomlinson 2016). Employee Resistance UHK already faces the problem of hiring untrained casual staffs for providing education to university’s students. Thus, the probability of the adaptation of the new techniques for providing knowledge to students can impacts their performance. This will furthermore give rise to dissatisfaction among the employees. Training Issue In case of UHK, the managing people have to focus more time on the core changes like improving the accommodation of the university, improving the facility of the infrastructure and implementing tools for communication system (Fernandezet al. 2012). Another problem raised if not all the employees opted for the training session as they are more concerned towards their productivity. UHK also face the same issue as people do not like to get trained as some of them can sense the feeling of insecurity that they may not be able to perform efficiently compared to others.
12ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT 2.3.2 Contingency plan to overcome the issues and barriers The problem of making every staff convinced for adopting change managementcan be overcome through one to one session and through meeting where these employees can tell about the problem that restricted them to adopt the change in the organizational culture (Grunig 2013). Through this approach not only the exact problem of the people can be identified but a mutual strategic step can also be taken that help them to adopt the changes. This problemof hiring untrained causal teaching staffscan be addressed through the trainingregardingtheeffectiveknowledgeandtherecenttechniquethroughwhichthe knowledge is given to the students. External experts can also be hired and regular practical assessments should also be implemented for the teaching staffs (Goetsch and Davis 2014).These experts can assess the knowledge test of the staffs prior recruiting them for the university. This plan is helpful for the university to recognize whether or not the person is eligible for teaching the university international student. The problem of adopting the change for training among the staffs can be addressed through analyzingindividual’sneed and then developed approachesthat can make them conformable for enrolling themselves for the training session (Okfalisaet al.2012). The management of the UHK should also develop the system of paid raining so that people can feel motivated to get the training. 2.4 Change Management- Action Research Identified Problem Declinationinnumberoflocalstudentsduetostructural changes Assault by drunken local youths on international students for taking jobs from locals Sharing the knowledge from one department to the other Management system in the organization is also centralized Hiring of casual staffs for the work Providing pass certificates to the students in spite of failing
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
13ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT grades ï‚·Gender discrimination working environment Effect of the Problem ï‚·Low profitability of the University ï‚·Lesser student intention to enrolled in the university ï‚·Lack of transparency and misalignment of the departmental progress ï‚·Staffs are not able to share the exact solution requited for the betterment of the organization ï‚·Ineffectiveteachersleadstopooreducationsysteminthe University ï‚·Poor knowledge base among the students ï‚·Female employee get unsafe working environment Feedback Process ï‚·The feedback is taken from the governing people and education ministersregarding formulation of strict university regulation so that not staffs can opt for unethical works like provide pass certificates in spite of low marks ï‚·The staffs should also plan to be included in the decision making sessions so that centralized structure of the organization can be reduced. Proposed Action ï‚·Top management of the company need to provide the power of decision making ability of the staffs ï‚·Take help of outside consultants and experts to develop this participative strategy ï‚·Share the change planning with their staffs through e-mails, office chat portal and social media group ï‚·Formulation of the checklist should also be present in the database to monitor the performance progress ï‚·Regular presentation session, conferences and group discussion and meetings can also be conducted to share the need for adopting the change Desired Outcome ï‚·Proper transparency among the staffs and effective planning to implementchangemanagementthatisrequiredfor implementing change. ï‚·Ethical education system from efficient teachers ï‚·Formulated rules by experts and government helps in ethical proceeding of the university 2.5 Analysis of the ethical issues implied 2.5.1 Missing some important aspects Overlooking of inclusion of the regulation of gender equality in the working environment in UHK can be occurred.The HR should maintain and strictly follow the equality regulations
14ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT while developing policies and regulation. It is also suggested them to take consultancy with the local governing bodies and other experts to develop organizational policiesin accordance with the nation’s discrimination regulations (Mowdayet al. 2013).The breaching of this regulation can occur if the person liable for hiring staffs follows favoritism and hire only those people, whom they prefer irrespective of the fact of their incompetency to teach students. This will affect students the most as incompetent teachers cannot make the concept of the syllabus. The hiring of the unprofessional teaching staffs also hampers the reputation of the university. 2.5.2 Transparency of sharing organizational values The problem of transparency of sharing organizational values occurred as there as the organization does not want any kind of stress in the employees and they also avoid the disagreement attitude of the working personnel.Moreover the lack of transparency occurs when the management of the organization intends to implement the strategy without wasting much time (Singh 2013).The staffs of the organization are mostly affected as they do not have proper knowledgeofthechangeimplementedinthefunctionalitieswhichonbeingsuddenly implemented affects the performance of the staffs. 2.5.3 Representation wrong data to the stakeholders Pullen and Rhodes (2015) stated that this process not only develops the sense of betrayal in the employees but it also gives rise to the problem of not meeting the standards of the organizational culture.The data are manipulated manually in order to change the outcome of the result that the organization successfully manages with the change implemented; whereas, in reality, the organization is struggling in overcoming the changed process.The stakeholders that are mostly affected through this ethical problem are the higher management and associated external experts.
15ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT 3.0 Conclusion University of Hard Knocks (UHK) faced several drawbacks like declination in number of local students due to structural changes to the local economy, assault by drunken local youths on international students for taking jobs from locals. The ethical issues that is associated with the organization are hiring of casual staffs for the work of giving education to Arts/Business students,providingpasscertificatestothestudentsinspiteoffailinggrades,gender discrimination working environment, unresponsive nature of the HR and improper transparency of sharing organizational values with the stakeholders. Kotter’s 8 steps Model of Change and McKinsey 7-S Change Framework is utilized for identifying and overcoming the issues of organizational silos and centralized nature of the management. The three changes proposed for the organization is to implement leadership change strategy, technological change strategies and communication strategies.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
16ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT 4.0 Reference List and Bibliography Alvesson, M. and Sveningsson, S., 2015.Changing organizational culture: Cultural change work in progress. Routledge. Appelbaum, S.H., Habashy, S., Malo, J.L. and Shafiq, H., 2012. Back to the future: revisiting Kotter's 1996 change model.Journal of Management Development,31(8), pp.764-782. Booth, S.A., 2015.Crisis management strategy: Competition and change in modern enterprises. Routledge. Burke, W.W., 2017.Organization change: Theory and practice. Sage Publications. Cameron, E. and Green, M., 2015.Making sense of change management: A complete guide to the models, tools and techniques of organizational change. Kogan Page Publishers. Dale, K. and Latham, Y., 2015. Ethics and entangled embodiment: Bodies–materialities– organization.Organization,22(2), pp.166-182. Doherty,T.L.,Horne,T.andWootton,S.,2014.Managingpublicservices-implementing changes: a thoughtful approach to the practice of management. Routledge. Doppelt, B., 2017.Leading change toward sustainability: A change-management guide for business, government and civil society. Routledge. Fernandez, S., COMMENTATORS, H.G.R., CONNOR, P.E., THOMPSON, F., MIHM, J.C. and TSCHIRHART, M., 2012. Managing successful organizational change in the public sector. InDebating Public Administration(pp. 33-52). Routledge. Fugate, M., Prussia, G.E. and Kinicki, A.J., 2012. Managing employee withdrawal during organizational change: The role of threat appraisal.Journal of Management,38(3), pp.890-914. Galliers, R.D. and Leidner, D.E. eds., 2014.Strategic information management: challenges and strategies in managing information systems. Routledge.
17ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT Goetsch, D.L. and Davis, S.B., 2014.Quality management for organizational excellence. Upper Saddle River, NJ: pearson. Gorran Farkas, M., 2013. Building and sustaining a culture of assessment: best practices for change leadership.Reference services review,41(1), pp.13-31. Grunig, J.E., 2013.Excellence in public relations and communication management. Routledge. Hayes, J., 2014.The theory and practice of change management. Palgrave Macmillan. Hornstein, H.A., 2015. The integration of project management and organizational change management is now a necessity.International Journal of Project Management,33(2), pp.291- 298. Larkin,M.B.,Bernardi,R.A.andBosco,S.M.,2012.Boardgenderdiversity,corporate reputation and market performance.International Journal of Banking and Finance,9(1), p.1. Michaelson, C., Pratt, M.G., Grant, A.M. and Dunn, C.P., 2014. Meaningful work: Connecting business ethics and organization studies.Journal of Business Ethics,121(1), pp.77-90. Mowday, R.T., Porter, L.W. and Steers, R.M., 2013.Employee—organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. Academic press. Okfalisa, Alias, R.A., Wong, K.Y. and Chong, S.C., 2012. A knowledge management metrics modelformeasuringstrategyimplementationsuccess.InternationalJournalofBusiness Excellence,5(4), pp.305-322. Pullen, A. and Rhodes, C., 2015. Ethics, embodiment and organizations.Organization,22(2), pp.159-165. Schnackenberg,A.K.andTomlinson,E.C.,2016.Organizationaltransparency:Anew perspectiveonmanagingtrustinorganization-stakeholderrelationships.Journalof Management,42(7), pp.1784-1810.
18ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT Sharif, M.M. and Scandura, T.A., 2014. Do perceptions of ethical conduct matter during organizationalchange?Ethicalleadershipandemployeeinvolvement.Journalof Business Ethics,124(2), pp.185-196. Singh, A., 2013. A study of role of McKinsey's 7S framework in achieving organizational excellence.Organization Development Journal,31(3), p.39. Van der Voet, J., 2014. The effectiveness and specificity of change management in a public organization: Transformational leadership and a bureaucratic organizational structure.European Management Journal,32(3), pp.373-382. Weiss, J.W., 2014.Business ethics: A stakeholder and issues management approach. Berrett- Koehler Publishers.