Organizational Strategy & Leadership Assignment

1
Organizational Strategy & Leadership
Name:
Course
Professor’s name
University name
City, State
Date of submission

2
Introduction
BHP Billiton
BHP Billiton is an Anglo-Australian multinational mining company that is based in Melbourne,
Victoria, Australia. It is listed in the Australian stock exchange and the London stock exchange
and is the second largest mining company in the world based on revenues. In 2017, its revenue
hit $38.28 billion dollars while the operating income was $ 11.753 billion dollars. The net
income in the same years was $6.222 billion dollars. It operates in the mining and metal industry
and has been the dominant player in this industry since 2001 after the merger between BHP and
Billiton. Its parent organization is the BHP Billiton group and has employed more than 65,000
employees. Although its main operations and its headquarters are in Melbourne Australia
(Aarons, Ehrhart, and Hurlburt, 2015). It operates as a multinational in various other continent
like Europe and the Americas.
Notable people in the organization include; CEO, Andrew Stewart Mackenzie who was
appointed in 2013. Its stock and share operate under the tag BLT in both the London and the
Australian stock markets.
Organizational structure
BHP operates like any other organization that has structural hierarchy as an organization. It's led
by the board of directors who include both the executive and the non-executive directors. The
organizational operations is led by the CEO who is deputized by various managers and directors
in such departments as operations, finance, procurement and more. The managers head the

3
departments and have departmental heads and mid-level managers to oversee efficient operations
of the business. The flow of authority then ends down to normal business employees who
amount to over 65,000 worldwide. The company is one of the biggest in terms of employees in
Australia (Alvesson and Sveningsson, 2015).
Communication in Organization Structure
Communication is generally considered as a process that occurs between members of a social
community. Being a process, communication within organizations consists of dynamic activity,
in a certain way in constant flow, but that maintains a certain degree of structure identification.
However, it must be considered that this structure is not static but changing and that it adjusts
according to the development of the organizations. The collectivities in which communication
within organizations takes place are typically considered as systems. A system is composed of a
series of interdependent activities, which, when integrated, form a specific set of objectives
(Bolman, and Deal, 2017).
Therefore, communication in organizations is considered as a process that takes place within a
specific system of interrelated activities. The communication between the members of an
organization involves the creation, exchange (reception and sending), process and storage of
messages.
Organizational communication is understood as a set of techniques and activities aimed at
facilitating and streamlining the flow of messages that occur between the members of the
organization, between the organization and its environment, or influencing opinions, skills and

4
behaviors of the internal and external public of the organization, all in order that the latter meets
the objectives better and faster.
For the function of communication to be effective inside and outside the organization, it must be:
Open: Its main objective is to communicate with the outside world and send organizational
messages to the internal and external public.
Evaluative: It is the instantaneous communication that is generated within an organization.
Flexible: Its purpose is to allow a timely communication between formal and organized.
Multidirectional: Organizational communication must flow in all directions: top to bottom,
bottom to top, cross, internal, external among others.
Instrumented: The communication uses tools, supports, devices; the malfunction of organizations
is explained through the information circulating within it, and that does not arrive at the right
time, nor use the appropriate structures for communication to be effective.
Organizational communication is observed in five perspectives:
In BHP, the organization communication works in the following five perspectives,
Internal communication: It is the one that is carried out within an organization, to maintain the
good relations between the members of the company through the circulation of messages, which

5
are sent through the different media, to provide communication, union, and motivation, for the
fulfillment of the objectives and goals (Bortolotti, Boscari, and Danese, 2015).
External communication: It is the communication that is aimed at external audiences, to maintain
and increase public relations and project the corporate image of the company.
Public Relations: These are the activities and communication programs, which are executed to
maintain good relations with the different publics that make up the company.
Advertising: They are the messages issued by the mass media, which seek to increase the sale of
products or services of the organization.
Institutional publicity: It is a tool of public relations, used by the company to project in public a
favorable image of the organization.
All the elements mentioned above in the BHP Billiton communication must be contemplated by
the companies, to guide their efforts to increase their competitiveness and improve their
communication channels that allow them to reduce costs and increase their profit margin.
At present, competitiveness is one of the engines of progress for nations, according to the Oxford
Dictionary of Economics: it is "the ability to compete in markets for goods or services. It is an
economic factor that supports elements of rivalry and improvement, thus, we observe how the
search for new business opportunities is a constant at the dawn of the new millennium and has a
more accurate image of competitiveness: Competitiveness is a concept that it is defined as the
ability to gain participation in the internal and external markets in a sustained manner over time
and in such a way that it leads to an increase in the real income of its population. Under this
perspective, competitiveness is strongly related to the organizational communication that a

6
company has and its ability to link with other sectors or companies, allowing it to have a broad
panorama of market demands, as well as the supply of inputs and necessary goods for production
(Feldman, 2017).
Organizational culture
Organizational culture is the underlying assumptions, beliefs, ways of interacting and values that
contribute to the social and psycho-socio environment in an organization. It includes the
experiences, member's behavior, organizational expectations and future beliefs. It is also based
on written and unwritten rules of the organization, shared customs, and attitudes developed over
a period. It also includes the organization's visions, mission, values, norms, symbols, language,
and habits.
In BHP Billiton, the organizational culture has been set up by more than 65,000 employees. In its
headquarters, BHP uses English for communication. However, in its other offices like in Peru
and South America, workers can communicate with their most preferred method of
communication.
Its mission statement is to be the company of choice. It aims at creating sustainable value for
shareholders, contractors, employees, business partners, customers, suppliers and host
communities. We aspire to harm no one as we carry our mining activities (Hartnell, Fugate and
Doyle Corner, 2016).
Leadership

7
There are very many factors that affect the type of leadership a company has. Different
companies have different leadership styles. Few leaders exert more influence on an
organizational culture. The leaders in an organization like BHP base their leadership on a
combination of personal and organizational culture. The factors will then determine and affect
the leadership style that an organization has. There are different advantages and disadvantages of
each leadership style. The direction, influence and general success of a company boil down to
cultural factors and principles established in the existing organizational culture.
Origin of the culture
Organizational behavior and culture begin when the leaders in the company start operations of
the company. A series of agreements, explicit and implicit begins to change and govern the
behavior as the organization grows. Collective culture comes in when more people join the
organization. In BHP, all the 65, 000 practices the organization culture and the subsequent
incoming leaders follow the existing behaviors and values.
Strategy
Organization culture plays a fundamental role in decision making done by the leaders. Strategies
cannot be successful if the organization culture is contrary to the beliefs of the leaders. When
strategic decisions and initiatives try to change the culture of the organization too quickly, the
leadership fails miserably.
Personal culture

8
The global mindset point to the fact that leadership is more associated with organization culture,
however, personal culture plays a major role and an important one. A leaders personal
background such as their religion, ethnicity, history and geographical location plays a major role.
With a collective culture, leaders can implement more group-oriented practices and incentive
plans. Individualistic culture types of leadership are narrow and short-sighted. The personal
culture of leaders such as the background leads to the strategies that will be used. Some are more
aggressive while other are soft in approach. This is for profit and service-oriented leadership.
Personal culture also affects the promotion of a leader for participating in the organization
culture and sufficient effect on the organization.
Considerations
Improving the working and living condition depends on the leadership style. Although an
organization culture keeps on changing, leadership can set in motion consideration to change the
strategy of the business. Leadership points out to cultures and reflect on the attitude and energy
of the leaders. Currently, a competitive company is increasingly characterized by its dependence
on the provision of physical inputs, and increasingly, by its ability to exploit intangible assets,
such as their entrepreneurial skills, that is, their intellectual capital. "The transformation capacity
that a company can exhibit to move from the exploitation of physical inputs to the efficient
management of knowledge determines its true degree of competitiveness (Williams, Glisson, and
Green, 2017). Porter's competitiveness diamond shows the factors that determine the
organizational competitive advantages for a certain economic sect points out that the new
business competition implies the combination of four conditions: A business management,

9
capable of generating innovation in its products, productive processes and forms of internal
organization, New mechanisms of coordination in the phases of the productive chain , A more
efficient organization of the industry in terms of competition and cooperation, The design of
active industrial policies that encourage the creative and formative use of the market (Helms
Mills and Mills, 2017). The two variables described above (organizational communication and
competitiveness) are compatible only if there is a cohesive element: the linkage, through this
variable, organizations induce their actions and design models that give them competitive
advantages.
Does link come from the Latin vice ul? Re, which means: Tying or found something in
something else. Perpetuate or continue something or exercise it. In other words, to link in
organizational terms is to unite the objectives, with common goals. In this way we can
understand that organizational communication and competitiveness are linked through linking,
projecting the image and positioning of organizations, whether public or private. In order to
specify the type of linkage that the study addresses, it is defined to the Company relationship as:
"the means that allows the organization to interact with its environment, effectively and
efficiently coordinating its teaching, research and extension of culture and services, while
enhancing its ability to interact with the productive and social sectors in actions of mutual
benefit, which favors its strategic positioning (Kollenscher, and Farjoun,, 2017). In general, the
concept of organization-company relationship is given the exclusive connotation of agreements
that can be signed by universities and companies. However, the relations between businessmen
and organization researchers are of greater importance. Further, it can be said that a organization-
business linkage model must be focused on the use of applied research that is generated in

10
educational institutions. Superior, to convert projects with technical-economic viability into
productive and innovative companies, capable of inserting themselves into the productive chains.
Organizations in Decision making
In everyday life, we all make decisions every day, since we got up and decided to go to work. In
the case of the decision-making process in the organization, we refer to those decisions that are
relevant to the operation of the company.
The process of making decisions in an organization begins with the detection of a situation that
surrounds a problem. Next, come the analysis and definition of the problem. To do this, it is
necessary to have a reliable, timely, and up-to-date information system that makes it possible to
clearly understand the nature of the problem to be solved (Sagwa, and Martin, 2015).
Formal organization in Strategic Decision making
Formal organization is a fixed set of rules, structures, and procedures for ordering an
organization.
The formal organization aims to indicate what each one does, what relationship they have with
each of the members of the company and under whose orders they are. This is where the main
problem in small companies arises since this "formal organization" if it exists, is a mere
formalism that is not followed. The organization, on the other hand, is formed by the people and
relationships that exist between them, coexists with the formal organization, but often does not

11
pay attention to the effects it has on the efficiency of the formal organization. The formal
organization can either support the organization or hinder it.
On what is the BHP Billiton organization based?
It can be based on:
The friendship that develops between members of an organization, not always from the same
department or the same hierarchical level. In many occasions the employees of a company "use"
that friendship to obtain things that through the formal organization would be more complicated
or even impossible. To do this, hierarchical levels are often skipped, which not only creates
discomfort in those who are "skipped", but can create serious problems in the operation of the
company. On the other hand, if the organization prevails more frequently than the formal one, it
can be a sign that something is not right with the formal structure (Maria Stock,and
Schnellbaecher, 2017).
Power structure
We all know that associated with any work within a company there is a degree of authority, but it
is also true that this authority must coexist with what is called individual power. Contrary to
authority, this type of power is not associated to the position but the person and can be caused by
factors such as seniority in the company, knowledge, contacts, information, charisma, etc.

12
A person who has this individual power will be able to exert influence over others. Your opinion
is valued. There are also those people who have hands, that is, that their colleagues consider that
they have more power because they have "contacts" at the top level in the organization
(Meier,and O’Toole , 2017).
Decision structure According to the formal organization, each position has to make a series of
decisions to fulfill the functions assigned to it, but when the decision is made by another person,
it is organizationally annulled to whoever is responsible for executing it.
This usually happens a lot in companies, because the owners want to be the ones who make all
the decisions (centralization), with which the middle managers are somewhat canceled because
the rest of the staff knows that at the end who makes the decision He is the owner and not the
manager (Millar, and Allen, 2018).
The organization cannot and should not try to eliminate itself, it must coexist with it, but
measures must be taken so that they do not obstruct the formal organization, the formal
communication channels must be complied with as much as possible.
Summary
In the present essay, it is intended to analyze in a general way the communication that there must
be in the organizations, which is a key factor of success or failure of the same. It seeks to
emphasize the importance that communication has taken in recent years, as well as the forms of
communication: formal and organization that occur within a company. Likewise, the aim is to
raise awareness of the importance of communicating effectively and effectively, and of the

13
importance of communication in the employees and leaders of an organization, as well as taking
into account that there are different forms of communication that they are carried out within an
organization, as they are in a descending, ascending and horizontal manner, just as there is a
need for adequate feedback.
The importance of organizational communication
In the present work, the topic of communication in organizations is addressed in a general way as
a key factor for them. Since a long time ago, communication has played a very important role in
the daily life of the human being; man has always been in need of communicating with his peers
to express his feelings and wait for an answer, or opinion (Mills, 2017). It is a process so simple
but at the same time essential for human life, which involves known elements such as sender,
message, channel, receiver and feedback which takes place between two or more people, these
characteristics are the essence process dynamics. Communication is a fundamental part for
business success, which every business owner has to take into account, it is important to
communicate with workers and encourage them to act in the same way, for many it is a challenge
that is easy to hear and simple to make, but that involves different aspects to take into account
since each person is a different world and even more in the business field where the human
factor is the most difficult to overcome in companies, that is when communication plays a
fundamental role, since it has to be done correctly and effectively (Naranjo-Valencia, and Sanz-
Valle, 2016).

14
Development
It is important to know that communication is inevitable since one cannot stop doing it, the
human being constantly sends non-verbal messages even when we are silent, this can be
reflected in gestures, postures, the expression of the face and different behaviors in the that we
can identify certain attitudes. It is also important to mention that communication is irreversible,
that is, the words we say can no longer be returned, that is why it plays a very important role to
think before speaking, and more importantly the way we say the things.
Learning is based on communication, since the knowledge acquired is based on the interaction of
one person with another in which different information, ideas, thoughts, and experiences can be
transmitted, coupled with the practice of their work and the previous information that you have,
thus fulfilling a communication process. On the other hand, the organizational climate has to be
the right one in an organization, since it is an environment in which the worker has to unwrap on
a daily basis and once again the most important factor is communication since it depends on
whether a good performance is carried out within the organization. The skills to communicate
are also relevant, that is why large companies see communication as a very important factor.
Some research highlights the importance of communication skills, including collaborating as a
team; teach others; serve customers; lead; negotiate; work considering cultural diversity; to
interview; hear; lead work meetings, and resolve conflicts. The preceding explains why about 90
percent of US companies offer some type of skills training in common

15
This information reveals that knowing how to communicate is even more important, even, that of
aspects of knowledge. For an administrator, the development of communication skills is vital,
since one of their main tasks is communication, in addition to being a career that focuses on
people (Smith, K., 2016). Many companies do not give such importance to this concept, seeing
themselves involved in a lack of communication that diminishes job performance over time and
in this way the profits of organizations, including, for example, in educational institutions such
as Universities should be in constant communication with their students to know their concerns
or possible ideas for improvement to the institution and in this way to improve together, this
would raise the level of compliance and confidence of the student and of course the performance,
the same occurs in companies, is say, senior managers have to be in constant communication
with their work team, this to let the worker know that is important and is part of the organization,
this will help to not create communication barriers and that the employee is satisfied and the best
of itself (Lee, and Kramer, 2016). Communication can improve mistakes and thus improve the
road to success, if there is In communication, it is probable that the results are not what is
desired, just as if there is poor communication, the problems can be aggravated the more they are
discussed, in this way misunderstandings would be encouraged and could even generate some
resentment when the people do not communicate well. Another important factor that
organizations have to take into account is who will communicate with whom, so they have to
establish patterns or communication networks by which information can flow, there are formal
and organization (Rothaermel, 2015). The formal are those that are designed by the management
itself and establish who should speak with whom to carry out a task; these networks are
represented in what we know as an organizational chart which describes who is the immediate
boss and who is responsible Immediate of a given task.

16
References
Aarons, G.A., Ehrhart, M.G., Farahnak, L.R. and Hurlburt, M.S., 2015. Leadership and
organizational change for implementation (LOCI): a randomized mixed method pilot study of a
leadership and organization development intervention for evidence-based practice
implementation. Implementation Science, 10(1), p.11.
Alvesson, M. and Sveningsson, S., 2015. Changing organizational culture: Cultural change
work in progress. Routledge.
Bolman, L.G. and Deal, T.E., 2017. Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership.
John Wiley & Sons.
Bortolotti, T., Boscari, S. and Danese, P., 2015. Successful lean implementation: Organizational
culture and soft lean practices. International Journal of Production Economics, 160, pp.182-201.
Feldman, S., 2017. Memory as a moral decision: The role of ethics in organizational culture.
Taylor & Francis.
Hartnell, C.A., Kinicki, A.J., Lambert, L.S., Fugate, M. and Doyle Corner, P., 2016. Do
similarities or differences between CEO leadership and organizational culture have a more
positive effect on firm performance? A test of competing predictions. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 101(6), p.846.

17
Helms Mills, J.C. and Mills, A.J., 2017. Rules, Sensemaking, Formative Contexts, and Discourse
in the Gendering of Organizational Culture☆. In Insights and Research on the Study of Gender
and Intersectionality in International Airline Cultures (pp. 49-69). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Hogan, S.J. and Coote, L.V., 2014. Organizational culture, innovation, and performance: A test
of Schein's model. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), pp.1609-1621.
Kollenscher, E., Eden, D., Ronen, B. and Farjoun, M., 2017. Architectural Leadership: The
neglected core of organizational leadership. European Management Review, 14(3), pp.247-264.
Lee, Y. and Kramer, A., 2016. The role of purposeful diversity and inclusion strategy (PDIS) and
cultural tightness/looseness in the relationship between national culture and organizational
culture. Human Resource Management Review, 26(3), pp.198-208.
Maria Stock, R., Zacharias, N.A. and Schnellbaecher, A., 2017. How Do Strategy and
Leadership Styles Jointly Affect Co‐development and Its Innovation Outcomes?. Journal of
Product Innovation Management, 34(2), pp.201-222.
Meier, K.J. and O’Toole Jr, L.J., 2017. Isopraxis Leadership: Leader Confidence, Managerial
Strategy, and Organizational Performance. Chinese Public Administration Review, 8(1), pp.47-
64.
Millar, R.J., Hepburn, C., Beddington, J. and Allen, M.R., 2018. Principles to guide investment
towards a stable climate. Nature Climate Change, p.1.

18
Mills, A.J., 2017. Studying the Gendering of Organizational Culture over Time: Concerns,
Issues, and Strategies☆. In Insights and Research on the Study of Gender and Intersectionality
in International Airline Cultures (pp. 71-91). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Naranjo-Valencia, J.C., Jiménez-Jiménez, D. and Sanz-Valle, R., 2016. Studying the links
between organizational culture, innovation, and performance in Spanish companies. Revista
Latinoamericana de Psicología, 48(1), pp.30-41.
Rothaermel, F.T., 2015. Strategic management. McGraw-Hill Education.
Sagwa, E.V., K’Obonyo, P. and Martin, O., 2015. Joint and Individual Effects of Human
Resource Management Practices, Organizational Learning, Employee Outcomes and
Competitive Strategy on Performance of Firms Listed on the Nairobi Securities Exchange.
Shanafelt, T.D. and Noseworthy, J.H., 2017, January. Executive leadership and physician well-
being: nine organizational strategies to promote engagement and reduce burnout. In Mayo Clinic
Proceedings (Vol. 92, No. 1, pp. 129-146). Elsevier.
Smith, K., 2016. Brazil: BHP Billiton under pressure for Samarco compensation. Green Left
Weekly, (1119), p.18.
Williams, N.J., Glisson, C., Hemmelgarn, A. and Green, P., 2017. Mechanisms of change in the
ARC organizational strategy: Increasing mental health clinicians’ EBP adoption through
improved organizational culture and capacity. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and
Mental Health Services Research, 44(2), pp.269-283.