Climate Change Impacts on Biodiversity

This assignment examines the profound effects of climate change on biodiversity worldwide. It delves into the vulnerability of various plant and animal species to changing environmental conditions, highlighting specific examples like orchids and montane flora. The analysis considers the challenges posed by range contractions, habitat loss, and shifting climatic patterns. Furthermore, it explores the importance of sustainable development practices and international cooperation in mitigating these impacts.

CLIMATE CHANGE 1
UNIVERSITY
Climate Change and Biodiversity
Name
Instructor's Name
Institution
Institution's Location
Date

CLIMATE CHANGE 2
Abstract
The current paper expects to distinguish the connections between environmental change
as one noteworthy danger to biodiversity and its fundamental financial main thrusts and also the
subsequent effects on biological community merchandise and enterprises and human reactions.
The DPSIR framework has been used in order to find out the sequential and inter-related
connections among the driving forces, pressure, state, impacts, and reactions regarding the
climate change which ultimately affects biodiversity. It has been found out that human actions
and socio-economic developments are hugely contributing to climate change. Sever issues such
as rising of the sea level and increase in temperature are the results of irresponsible human
actions. As a result, many species are on the verge of being extinct or are gradually declining.
Various policies have been implemented in order to handle these issues. However, very few of
them has been of great use. In this regard, proper assessment of the scenario and evaluation of
the human conditions are required to formulate viable policies and strictly implement them both
locally and globally so that biodiversity is retained and environmental sustainability is
prolonged.

CLIMATE CHANGE 3
Table of Contents
Abstract.......................................................................................................................................................2
Table of Contents........................................................................................................................................3
List of Figures...............................................................................................................................................4
1.0. Introduction and Background...............................................................................................................5
2.0. Methods...............................................................................................................................................6
3.0. Literature Review.................................................................................................................................7
3.1. Drivers and Pressure.........................................................................................................................7
3.2. State...............................................................................................................................................10
3.3. Impacts...........................................................................................................................................10
3.4. Responses.......................................................................................................................................12
4.0. Conclusion..........................................................................................................................................13
References.................................................................................................................................................14

CLIMATE CHANGE 4
List of Figures
Figure 1: The DPSIR Diagram....................................................................................................................6

CLIMATE CHANGE 5
Climate Change and Biodiversity
1.0. Introduction and Background
Biodiversity incorporates all plants, creatures, microorganisms, the biological systems of
which they are a section, and the assorted variety inside species, amongst species, and of
environments (Thompson et al., 2009). Human prosperity and advancement firmly rely upon
biodiversity and, biological system administrations (UNEP, 2007). An extensive variety of
natural materials not just gives the assets we have to sustenance, attire, and safe house, yet in
addition add to different components of human prosperity, for example, wellbeing. These assets
are being lost because of harm to biological communities because of different and
communicating weights. Biodiversity is diminishing and biological system administrations are
lessened (Dangles et al., 2016). Some essential weights on biodiversity and biological system
administrations are living space change, (for example, arrive utilize changes, physical alteration
of waterways or water withdrawal from streams and loss of coral reefs), environmental change,
obtrusive species, over-abuse, and contamination. Main thrusts behind those weights are among
others statistic, monetary, socio-political, social, religious, logical, and innovative changes.
Despite the fact that biodiversity may likewise change because of normal causes, current change
is overwhelmed by the anthropogenic main impetuses (Dangles et al., 2016). Current
environmental or climate changes joined with other human advancements are focusing on
biodiversity long ways past the progressions caused by common worldwide climatic changes that
happened in the current transformative past (Eggermont et al., 2015). From atmosphere science,
one thinks about the distinctive potential outcomes and sweeping dangers of anthropogenic
environmental change, including temperature expands, the move of atmosphere zones, ocean
level ascent, dry spells, surges, and other extraordinary climate occasions (Steffen et al., 2015).

CLIMATE CHANGE 6
These dangers will possibly have far reaching consequences for the regular habitat and
additionally on human social orders. Therefore, there is an immediate need to assess the current
situation and find out how exactly the human actions are impacting the environment in order to
formulate proper strategies and policies both at the local as well as the global level in order to
preserve biodiversity and ensure environmental sustainability.
2.0. Methods
The analysis will be based on the DPSIR framework (Drivers–Pressures–State–Impacts–
Responses) in order to generate viable and proper results. This particular framework helps in
understanding the interaction amongst the human society and the environment.
Figure 1: The DPSIR Diagram
(Source: Gulfofmarine.org)

CLIMATE CHANGE 7
As per the framework, the socio-economic developments operate as the potential driving
forces which pressurize the environmental balance and lead to a state of different changes in the
environmental scenario in the form of concerning impacts. The goal has been not to build up all
components of the structure totally, however to outline each of the components with specific
reference to the environmental change suggestions for biodiversity.
3.0. Literature Review
3.1. Drivers and Pressure
Environmental changes or transformation are a weight that prompts biodiversity change.
Human monetary movement is a noteworthy hidden reason for fast changes in climatic synthesis
and changing the land cover and land utilizes. Financial improvement, coming about conduct,
strategies, activities and basic philosophies and religious, social or political convictions underlie
main impetuses of environmental change. Some financial exercises are specifically connected to
environmental change. Hidden the reasons for the environmental change are fundamental
societal patterns that can be impacted mostly by strategy, however just in the long haul. These
patterns incorporate statistic, monetary, socio-political, logical and mechanical, social and
religious variables (Thompson et al., 2009). They can be viewed as the fundamental main thrusts
for any human-incited advancement in normal and financial frameworks. Vitality utilizes,
transport hones, arrive utilize practices, exchange, and tourism emphatically decide the size of
environmental change as a weight on biodiversity. In Europe, the utilization of vitality is the
most noteworthy main impetus for environmental change: ozone harming substance (GHG)
discharges result principally from the burning of petroleum derivatives (oil, coal, characteristic
gas) for vitality use in the vitality creation, transport, industry and private divisions. As opposed

CLIMATE CHANGE 8
to talking about these areas, the attention here is on transport as an imperative vitality devouring
segment. Vitality utilization, transport hones, arrive utilize practices, exchange, and tourism
emphatically decide the size of environmental change as a weight on biodiversity. In Europe, the
utilization of vitality is the most noteworthy main impetus for environmental change: ozone
harming substance (GHG) discharges result principally from the burning of petroleum
derivatives (oil, coal, characteristic gas)3 for vitality use in the vitality creation, transport,
industry and private divisions. As opposed to talking about these areas, the attention here is on
transport as an imperative vitality devouring segment. disclosed to a huge degree by expanding
transport volumes (Vittoz et al., 2013). The quantity of autos has tripled over the most recent
three decades, with an increment of 3 million autos every year. In spite of the fact that the level
of auto a proprietorship is probably going to balance out in many nations of the EU15, this would
not be the situation in the new EU nations (European Commission, 2010). The adjustments in
transportation have prompted an expansion of GHG discharges and centralizations of these
gasses in the air, which is causing environmental change. Moreover, environmental change is
prompting changes in biodiversity, which affect biological systems capacities.
Worldwide environmental transformation or shift is occurring because of the expansion
in the air centralization of nursery gasses (GHGs). The gasses that contribute most to the
anthropogenic nursery impact are carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and fluorine mixes.
Albeit the greater part of these gasses happen normally in the climate, their current noteworthy
environmental amassing is the consequence of human exercises. The outflows of nursery gasses
have adjusted the arrangement of the Earth's air and this has changed the vitality adjust of the
earth framework, prompting warming at the world's surface. These progressions will likewise
affect future worldwide atmosphere (OECD, 2010). European Union (2015) has reasoned that

CLIMATE CHANGE 9
warming of the atmosphere framework is unequivocal. It is seen in increments in worldwide
normal air and sea temperatures, broad softening of snow and ice, and rising worldwide ocean
level. Moreover, the greater part of the watched increment in comprehensively arrived at the
midpoint of temperatures since the mid-twentieth century is exceptionally likely because of the
watched increment in anthropogenic ozone depleting substance focuses (IPCC, 2007).
Notwithstanding changes in midpoints or average measures of temperature, precipitation or
ocean level, anthropogenic environmental change is additionally connected to changes in the
recurrence and force of extraordinary occasions, which can likewise influence biodiversity. More
serious and longer dry spells have been seen over more extensive territories since the 1970s,
especially in the tropics and subtropics (IPCC, 2007). The situations likewise recommend that it
is likely that hot extremes, warm waves, and substantial precipitation occasions will keep on
becoming more continuous and it is likely that future tropical twisters will turn out to be more
exceptional, with bigger pinnacle wind rates and all the more overwhelming precipitation. These
adjustments in extremes would influence biodiversity. A further aberrant risk to biodiversity
because of environmental change is the expanding fermentation of the seas because of expanding
barometrical carbon dioxide focuses. A specific hazard related with environmental change is
supposed tipping focuses past which vast and quick changes in the conduct of regular and
financial frameworks can happen. Some of these potential nonlinear changes are identified with
positive criticisms in the atmosphere framework (Jaeger, 2007). If the situation goes past the
tipping focuses in the atmosphere framework, then it would have would have concerning results
for biodiversity.

CLIMATE CHANGE 10
3.2. State
It has been contended that the present standards of human effect on biodiversity are
exceptional, influencing the planet in general, and causing expansive scale loss of biodiversity
(Bellard et al., 2012). Numerous ensuing investigations have reported changes in biodiversity
because of environmental change. A portion of the watched transformations in biodiversity
ascribed to atmosphere change incorporate cases in the Arctic, mountain biological communities,
and coral reefs (Liu et al., 2010). In the Arctic, shorter times of ocean ice scope are imperiling
the polar bear's living space and presence by giving them less time to chase. Environmental
change has likewise been seen to impactsly affect mountain biological systems. For instance, in
the Alps, some plant species have been relocating upwards by one to four meters for every
decade and a few plants already just found on peaks have vanished (Bellard et al., 2012). An
imperative wellspring of biodiversity which is being influenced by environmental change is soil
biodiversity. It has been called attention to that environmental change modifies the natural
surroundings of soil biota, which changes the decent variety and structure of species and their
wealth (EEA, 2008). This is being expected that different natural surroundings of numerous
species may move toward pole regions from their present areas. On the off chance that, when,
where and how quick they move changes firmly among species. Species that live respectively in
a biological community are probably not going to move together, in this way the structure
(biodiversity) of numerous environments will change (Noroozi et al., 2011).
3.3. Impacts
Capacities, merchandise, and administrations related to biological communities are firmly
associated with the biodiversity of these frameworks and are a reason for human survival and
prosperity. These biological community capacities are partitioned into supporting, provisioning,

CLIMATE CHANGE 11
direction, and social capacities. In the event that species are lost or relocate to different zones
they can't give nourishment, water, fuel-wood, fiber, bio-chemicals or hereditary assets any
longer, or just to a restricted degree, in spite of the fact that the biological community overall
could keep on functioning (Füssel, 2007). Environmental change impacts the atmosphere control
capacity of a biological community straightforwardly, yet additionally by implication by means
of the change of the land cover and plants in a given territory. The atmosphere control capacity
of timberlands is another case of an administration debilitated by environmental change.
Backwoods have a higher evapotranspiration as contrasted with different biological
communities, for example, meadows. The decrease of backwoods because of changed
precipitation examples will extremely influence this directing administration. Other controlling
administrations, for example, the direction of illness, are likewise impacted and adjusted by
environmental change and by the change of land cover and plant creation. For instance, warming
and expanded precipitation bolster the spread of infection vectors, for example, the mosquito.
Social administrations of biological communities are emphatically associated with the species
living in such environments. On the off chance that they are lost or changed, such
administrations can't be offered any more or are given in another way, which may yet require not
generally prompt a lessening of human prosperity (Polsky, Neff and Yarnal, 2007). Supporting
administrations, for example, soil arrangement and supplement cycling are changed if species are
lost and if directing administrations are changed. The net essential profitability of a few animal
types will increment due to a higher centralization of carbon dioxide. It has likewise been
proposed that if various measurements of biodiversity are headed to low levels, both the level
and strength of strong administrations may diminish. Transformations and shifts in the
environments' capacities and misfortunes of biodiversity due to the weight of environmental

CLIMATE CHANGE 12
change would themselves be able to influence the territorial and worldwide atmosphere, for
instance through changes in take-up and arrival of nursery gasses; these criticisms can be
negative or positive (Peh et al., 2011).
3.4. Responses
There are fundamentally two primary methodologies for handling the issue of
environmental change: mitigating CGC and adjustment to impacts. Moderation exercises impact
biodiversity. Contingent upon the outline and execution of those techniques, their fleeting and
spatial scale and the biological system being referred to, they can have positive, unbiased or
negative effects (UNEP, 2007). Cases of such techniques incorporate land utilize, arrive utilize
change and ranger service exercises, for example, afforestation, reforestation, and land
administration hone, and in addition the utilization of sustainable power sources rather than
petroleum derivatives. Some of these systems may prompt loss of biodiversity, for example by
substituting quickly developing tree estates for differentiated backwoods keeping in mind the end
goal to expand carbon take-up, or by developing bio-fuel crops. Within the context of the
developing nations, adjustment or adaptation is frequently viewed as a need, as an extensive
extent of their populace is subject to assets that are atmosphere touchy and as their versatile limit
is lower (La Sorte and Jetz, 2010). As of late, in nations, for example, Ecuador and Nigeria, a
type of alleviation with positive effects on biodiversity started by common society is intensely
talked about. The European Union has effectively perceived that Europe must adjust to the
environmental change impacts that are now unavoidable notwithstanding keeping away from and
switching environmental change through alleviation. Be that as it may, up until now,
environmental change contemplations were not incorporated into key EU ecological strategies.
In the meantime, extraordinary arrangements on expanding the bio-fuel content in transportation

CLIMATE CHANGE 13
powers are outfitted to diminishing carbon dioxide discharges however despite everything they
introduce a hazard for biodiversity.
4.0. Conclusion
The current paper has utilized the DPSIR framework in order to assess different aspects
of climate change linked to biodiversity. Because of an extensive variety of human exercises, or
main impetuses, the centralizations of nursery gasses in the climate are expanding. This is
prompting worldwide surface air temperature increments. The potential results of additionally
expanded outflows are as yet not completely investigated, but rather encourage temperature
increments are normal, and also rising ocean levels, changes in precipitation, and more
continuous events of outrageous climate occasions, for example, surges and dry seasons. These
progressions are weights on biodiversity. Changes of atmosphere together with other human
exercises will prompt the elimination or relocation of species, loss of natural surroundings, and
discontinuity. Changes in biodiversity prompt changes of biological system administrations and
in this way have impacts on human prosperity. The reaction alternatives are to relieve
environmental change and to adjust to it. It is vital, in any case, to guarantee that atmosphere
alleviation and adjustment methodologies are produced and executed in light of the issue of
biodiversity. Atmosphere adjustment and alleviation techniques that disregard the issue of
biodiversity risk undermining social and regular strength.

CLIMATE CHANGE 14
References
Bellard, C., Bertelsmeier, C., Leadley, P., Thuiller, W. and Courchamp, F. (2012). Impacts of
climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecology Letters, 15(4), pp.365-377.
Dangles, O., Loirat, J., Freour, C., Serre, S., Vacher, J. and Le Roux, X. (2016). Research on
Biodiversity and Climate Change at a Distance: Collaboration Networks between Europe and
Latin America and the Caribbean. PLOS ONE, 11(6), pp.e0157441-e0157452.
EEA (2008). Impacts of Europe's Changing Climate – 2008 Indicator-based Assessment.
Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
Eggermont, H., Balian, E., Azevedo, J., Beumer, V., Brodin, T., Claudet, J., Fady, B., Grube, M.,
Keune, H., Lamarque, P., Reuter, K., Smith, M., van Ham, C., Weisser, W. and Le Roux, X.
(2015). Nature-based Solutions: New Influence for Environmental Management and Research in
Europe. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 24(4), pp.243-248.
European Commission. (2010). Towards the EU-LAC Knowledge area—Scientific and
technological cooperation between Latin America, the Caribbean and the European Union for
sustainable development and social inclusion. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European
Union.
European Union. (2015). A European research and innovation roadmap for climate services.
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Füssel, H. (2007). Vulnerability: A generally applicable conceptual framework for climate
change research. Global Environmental Change, 17(2), pp.155-167

CLIMATE CHANGE 15
IPCC. (2007). Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Summary for Policymakers.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
La Sorte, F. and Jetz, W. (2010). Projected range contractions of montane biodiversity under
global warming. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277(1699), pp.3401-
3410.
Liu, H., Feng, C., Luo, Y., Chen, B., Wang, Z. and Gu, H. (2010). Potential Challenges of
Climate Change to Orchid Conservation in a Wild Orchid Hotspot in Southwestern China. The
Botanical Review, 76(2), pp.174-192.
Noroozi, J., Pauli, H., Grabherr, G. and Breckle, S. (2011). The subnival–nival vascular plant
species of Iran: a unique high-mountain flora and its threat from climate warming. Biodiversity
and Conservation, 20(6), pp.1319-1338.
OECD (2010). Globalisation, transport and the environment. Paris: OECD Publications.
Peh, K., Soh, M., Sodhi, N., Laurance, W., Ong, D. and Clements, R. (2011). Up in the Clouds:
Is Sustainable Use of Tropical Montane Cloud Forests Possible in Malaysia?. BioScience, 61(1),
pp.27-38.
Polsky, C., Neff, R. and Yarnal, B. (2007). Building comparable global change vulnerability
assessments: The vulnerability scoping diagram. Global Environmental Change, 17(3-4),
pp.472-485.
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockstrom, J., Cornell, S., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E., Biggs, R.,
Carpenter, S., de Vries, W., de Wit, C., Folke, C., Gerten, D., Heinke, J., Mace, G., Persson, L.,

CLIMATE CHANGE 16
Ramanathan, V., Reyers, B. and Sorlin, S. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human
development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), p.1259855.
Thompson, I., Mackey, B., McNulty, S. and Mosseler, A. (2009). Forest resilience, biodiversity,
and climate change. Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
UNEP. (2007). Global Environment Outlook GEO-4: Environment for Development. Nairobi:
United Nations Environment Programme.
Vittoz, P., Cherix, D., Gonseth, Y., Lubini, V., Maggini, R., Zbinden, N. and Zumbach, S.
(2013). Climate change impacts on biodiversity in Switzerland: A review. Journal for Nature
Conservation, 21(3), pp.154-162.