The Allocation of New Types of Parcels: An Organizational Report

This report examines the allocation of new types of parcels within an organization, focusing on the ethical and management challenges that arise. The report begins with an overview of the organizational issue, highlighting the role of the government and the allocation committee. It then delves into the ethical analysis, discussing consequentialist and non-consequentialist theories and their implications. The report further explores the management analysis, detailing the strategies implemented to address unethical behaviors and prevent future occurrences. Recommendations for solving the issues are provided, including the need for strict regulations, stakeholder engagement, and the use of technology to improve efficiency and accuracy. The report emphasizes the importance of ethical conduct, transparency, and effective management practices in the parcel allocation process, to achieve desired outcomes and ensure fairness and integrity.

THE ALLOCATION OF NEW TYPES OF PARCELS 1
ISSUES TAKING PLACE WITHIN AN ORGANIZATION
By (Name)
Name of the Course
Name of the Instructor
Name of the University
City and state
Due date

THE ALLOCATION OF NEW TYPES OF PARCELS 2
THE ALLOCATION OF NEW TYPES OF PARCELS
A brief overview of the organizational issue
The government, specifically the planning department that is found within the
municipality decided to bring this issue on board with an intention of addressing quite a number
of parameters within the surrounding community. The organization has gained popularity over a
wide range of population where it has been recognized for dealing with various issues within the
society most so the ones that affect most of the individuals together with several other
organizations in their daily operations. For quite a long time now, it has been dealing with issues
along the line of parcel allocation that is always conducted by a group of well trained and
experienced personnel who have got a vast knowledge in a wide category of fields that ranges
from the engineering field to the management field. The allocation of new types of parcels is one
of the important procedures that is intended to carry out quite a number of objectives with its
main objective being an appropriate allocation of different types of new parcels by carrying out a
thorough evaluation of various suggested locations through an adequate application of the
relevant allocation criteria. It is an issue that has gained popularity over the past due to different
positive outcomes that it has been able to attain in real time (Fayyazi and Aslani 2015). This
issues are known to have involved people of all sorts who originate from different backgrounds
where some of them are also known to have a different, it portrays quite a number of issues that
are carried out under certain circumstances with most of the operations revolving around ethical
issues within the organizations together with the individuals involved in it (Carter, Ellram and
Ready 2012). mindset pertaining the entire allocation process, On the other hand, it is a process
that is governed by different rules and regulations that were brought into consideration
specifically with an intention of bringing different issues in order (Čierna 2015). Apparently, this

THE ALLOCATION OF NEW TYPES OF PARCELS 3
issue emerged as a result of various factors that were being encountered by various individuals
together with the surrounding environment. One of the major factors that led to the emergence of
the issue was the need to adequately minimize the occurrence of any form of wrangles among
individuals and organizations who might be having some form of disagreement attached to a
particular parcel (Coupland and Brown 2012). This could only be achieved by bringing on board
an important body consisting of various professionals like the civil engineers who are well
versed with different issues associated with new parcels with the capability of applying various
allocation procedures in order to meet some of the targeted objectives in real time and in an
appropriate manner (Khalid et al. 2015). Different personalities and institutions are known to
have been showing a lot of interest when it comes to the allocation process since it is a procedure
that is equipped with a lot of positive outcomes where most of them tend to be friendly to the
surrounding environment. On the other hand, the subsequent development of allocation
procedures within the planning department is a procedure that has been slowly scaling up over
the past with various individuals and organizations coming on board equipped with quite a
number of ideas that are geared towards bringing a positive outcome (Dežmar-Krainz 2015). The
stakeholders, on the other hand, have been able to play a crucial role as far as this issue is
concerned, they have been able to offer strong support whenever there is the need to do so (Mort,
et al). The government is one of the key stakeholders involved in the entire process where it has
been able to carry out quite a number of issues to ensure that most of the future goals are attained
in real time (Carey, Shaw and Shiu 2008). On the other hand, the allocation committee is also
another key stakeholder that has been able to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that they are
capable of delivering different services associated with allocation procedures.
The ethical analysis that is attached to the issue

THE ALLOCATION OF NEW TYPES OF PARCELS 4
As far as the issue appears to be important under various conditions, it is also ethically
problematic due to quite a number of issues that were able to be experienced under various
circumstances (Ahmad, Hamid and Hamzah 2015). The temple was among the new parcels that
needed to be allocated by following appropriate allocation procedures through the help of
relevant civil engineers who are well equipped with various issues dealing with the allocation
process, however, this was not as expected (Remišová, Lašáková and Kirchmayer 2016). In as
much as it did not meet the allocation criteria that were set under the appropriate rules and
regulations, the allocation committee went ahead to accept it thereby going against the rules of
ethics which was as a result of the influence that originated from the higher position. According
to consequentialist theory, it has the capability of providing a judgment as to whether the entire
situation is right or wrong depending on the circumstances. The decision made by the allocation
committee by accepting the allocation process that did not meet the required allocation criteria,
they are likely to face quite a number of consequences with the major one entailing a condition
of being blamed and held responsible by various organizations and stakeholders who are against
issues that are unethical (Bell and Bryman 2007). One of the major types of consequentialism
that is known as hedonism strongly supports this condition by perfectly showing that it is ‘good'
under an argument that totally avoids any condition that is related to pain. On the other hand,
when dealing with the non-consequentialist theory, it always reaches a number of decisions on
the basis of a particular issue. It brings on board issues pertaining virtue ethics that clearly
explains some of the characters who were involved in the entire situation, it, therefore,
recognizes the higher position in government to be very unethical when it comes to making
decisions and following appropriate rules and regulations.
Management analysis that is associated with the issue

THE ALLOCATION OF NEW TYPES OF PARCELS 5
Upon realization of this situation, the management of the entire organization clearly came
off the board with a series of strategies that were meant to address this issue and eradicate
conditions that are associated with unethical behaviors. One of the first steps that were taken into
account by the management team as far as the issue is concerned was to call upon different who
were involved in the situation and are known to be serving in the senior government position
together with the allocation committee, after that, they were informed of the consequences that
are likely to emerge by not following the exact rules and regulations that were enforced as a
result of the allocation of various parcels. After that, they were taken to the court of law that was
given the mandate to determine whether they were guilty or not. Actually, the main reason as to
why the management decided to take this action is because is because the government
discourages any form of unethical behaviors or even corruption where the law clearly states that
anyone involved in such like scenarios is to be subjected to the court of law. On the other hand,
the management is also planning to discourage this issue from occurring in the near future by
coming up with strict rules and regulations where an official of the organization who is involved
in such a situation is to be terminated immediately from his position even without providing him
or her with a prior notice. Another step that the management decided to bring on board. The
management team also decided to bring on board an ethics and anticorruption team who are well
versed with carrying out an analysis regarding each and every that entails any form of unethical
issues. Their main aim was to deeply analyze the situation in order to pinpoint those parties that
were either directly or indirectly involved in the whole scenario that was against the rules and
regulations that were set at the initial stage. After conducting the analysis, they were to present
appropriate documentations to the management team who were then to decide the next course of
action to deal with the situation and even minimize as much as possible any form of its

THE ALLOCATION OF NEW TYPES OF PARCELS 6
occurrence in the coming future.This aims towards maintaining ethics to the highest standard at
all time. On the other hand, the management decided to take action of creating awareness across
each and every individual within the organization pertaining some of the effects that are brought
about by unethical behaviors. They were trained in how to avoid encountering any condition that
might lead them towards any form of unethical behavior within the organization.
Recommendations for solving the issue that involves the organization
As far as the above unethical issues are concerned, the entire organization needs to come
clear on the issue and be ready to accept that there is a problem before taking any step (Kivunja
2015). There is the need for the organization to come up with strict regulations that will be able
to govern most of the operations most so when it comes to allocation of various parcels through
the use of the right procedures from the beginning up to the end. Additionally, the organization
should also be able to set up a specific sector that is reliable and responsible for issues dealing
with ethics, this will allow them to come up with some appropriate conclusion regarding such
situations by making appropriate decisions that are that will not affect any part of the
organization (Shaw and Barry 2015). On the other hand, the management should fully engage the
stakeholders for them to have a chance of overseeing various scenarios and be able to make
appropriate decisions at an early stage before any problem moves to an advanced stage.
Additionally, the government should also be involved fully in order to attain most of the
objectives of the organization (Milne 2009). It should be highlighted on the roles that it should
play by creating awareness to its senior officials who are known to be involved in various
activities that are attached to the organization itself. Finally, the allocation committee should not
be given all the powers to accept each and every decision that is made by the organization
instead, a special body should also be made to ensure that there is an appropriate evaluation of

THE ALLOCATION OF NEW TYPES OF PARCELS 7
various issues that have been approved by the allocation committee and in case there is anything
that is not in accordance with the rules and regulations, then a special meeting is to be called to
engage each and every member by giving them an equal opportunity to present their opinions.
All the above mentioned will help to come up with an appropriate and reliable outcome towards
meeting each and every goal that has been set aside for future progress in the entire sector
(Markman and Krause 2016). There is the need to strategize and make good use of modern forms
of technology that will be able to increase the efficiency and accuracy in the entire allocation
process thus coming up with the desired outcome. Once these forms of technology are clearly
presented on board, they should be well equipped with a specific password that is only accessible
by the administrator who is in charge of each and every crucial activity that is carried out in the
entire allocation process. This will totally minimize the occurrence of any influence that is likely
to emerge either from a higher position of from any other position that might totally lead to the
manipulation of different activities taking place within the allocation process. Additionally, there
should be the employment of a special task force that is in charge of various procedures by
ensuring that appropriate rules and regulations are followed in a reasonable manner, this task
force too should be able to oversee various processes and come up with reasonable
recommendations geared towards bringing development activities within the organization and
even be able to meet different demands that have been placed on board within a particular set of
time. Engineers from different fields should also be placed on board since they have the
capability of presenting essential information during ay process of decision making, their
recommendations will be able to determine whether a particular decision is capable of bringing
either a positive outcome or a negative outcome depending on the situation at hand thus

THE ALLOCATION OF NEW TYPES OF PARCELS 8
minimizing as much as possible any form of influential parameters that might occur either
internally or externally.
References
Ahmad, I.F., Hamid, N.A.A. and Hamzah, M.I.M., 2015. Human Governance Management in
Islamic Higher Education Institutions. Asian Journal of Management Sciences & Education Vol,
4, p.3.
Bell, E. and Bryman, A., 2007. The ethics of management research: an exploratory content
analysis. British Journal of Management, 18(1), pp.63-77.

THE ALLOCATION OF NEW TYPES OF PARCELS 9
Čierna, H., 2015. Corporate social responsibility and its theoretical solutions (Process of ethical
and social responsibility). Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie/Politechnika Śląska,
(84), pp.49-64.
Carey, L., Shaw, D. and Shiu, E., 2008. The impact of ethical concerns on family consumer
decision‐making. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(5), pp.553-560.
Dowell, J. and Merrylees, N., 2009. Electives: isn’t it time for a change?. Medical education,
43(2), pp.121-126.
Carter, C.R., Ellram, L.M. and Ready, K.J., 2012. Environmental purchasing: benchmarking our
German counterparts. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 34(3),
pp.28-38.
Coupland, C. and Brown, A.D., 2010. Constructing organizational identities on the web: A case
study of Royal Dutch/Shell. Journal of management studies, 41(8), pp.1325-1347.
Dežmar-Krainz, K., 2015. Enhancing wellbeing of employees through corporate social
responsibility context. Megatrend revija, 12(2), pp.137-153.
Du Bois, W.E.B. and Marable, M., 2015. Souls of black folk. Routledge.
Fayyazi, M. and Aslani, F., 2015. The impact of work-life balance on employees’ job satisfaction
and turnover intention; the moderating role of continuance commitment. International
Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 51, pp.33-41.

THE ALLOCATION OF NEW TYPES OF PARCELS 10
Khalid, K., Azmi Ghani, A.I., Omar, M.W., Jani, R. and Anuar, M.M., 2015. The Millennial
Researchers’ Ethical Decision Model: A Psychoanalytic Approach. Advanced Science Letters,
21(5), pp.1256-1260.
Kivunja, C., 2015. Unpacking the information, media, and technology skills domain of the new
learning paradigm. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(1), p.166.
Milne, G.R., 2009. Privacy and ethical issues in database/interactive marketing and public
policy: A research framework and overview of the special issue. Journal of Public Policy &
Marketing, 19(1), pp.1-6.
Markman, G.D. and Krause, D., 2016. Theory building surrounding sustainable supply chain
management: Assessing what we know, exploring where to go. Journal of supply chain
management, 52(2), pp.3-10.
Mort, M., Roberts, C., Pols, J., Domenech, M., Moser, I. and EFORTT investigators, 2015.
Ethical implications of home telecare for older people: a framework derived from a multisited
participative study. Health Expectations, 18(3), pp.438-449.
Remišová, A., Lašáková, A. and Kirchmayer, Z., 2016. Relevance of Ethics Program
Components in Slovakia. SGBED wishes to recognize the following sponsors, p.742.
Shaw, W.H. and Barry, V., 2015. Moral issues in business. Cengage Learning 7(2), p.156.

THE ALLOCATION OF NEW TYPES OF PARCELS 11