Calculation of Payback Period and Net Present Value for S&P Plc Projects
Verified
Added on 2023/06/07
|7
|1374
|478
AI Summary
This report calculates the payback period and net present value (NPV) of two projects for S&P Plc to help make an informed decision. The report recommends investing in Project A due to its higher NPV.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3 MAIN BODY...................................................................................................................................3 Calculation of payback period.....................................................................................................3 Calculation of net present value (NPV).......................................................................................4 Analysis and discussions..............................................................................................................5 CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................6 REFERENCES................................................................................................................................7
INTRODUCTION This report specifically states information regarding the two projects in which the company S&P plc is not able to decide to invest in. the report basically calculates the payback period of both of the projects according to the information that is given and also the net present value (NPV) of either of the projects. MAIN BODY Calculation of payback period Payback period basically refers to the time within which the primary of the initial outlay of any investment is specifically expected to be recovered by enhancing the cash inflows that are generated through the investment that is made in the project in particular (Gorshkov. Murgul. and Oliynyk., 2016). Payback period calculation of synthetic leather bags- Project A YearAnnual cash flowCumulative cash flow 0(185, 000)(185, 000) 160, 000(125, 000) 268, 000(57, 000) 382, 00025, 000 4109, 000134, 000 5155, 000289, 000 Payback period = 2 + 57, 000/ 82, 000 Payback period = 2 + 0.69 = 2.7 years Payback period calculation of clothes bags- Project B YearAnnual cash flowCumulative cash flow 0(182, 000)(182, 000) 165, 000(117, 000) 269, 000(48, 000) 377, 00029, 000
4105, 000134, 000 5145, 000279, 000 Payback period = 2 + 48, 000/ 77, 000 Payback period = 2 + 0.62 = 2.6 years Calculation of net present value (NPV) Net present value basically refers to the difference amount between the present cash inflow value of the company and the present cash outflow value of the company over a particular period (Hopkinson., 2017). It is used for the purpose of evaluating the profitability that a projected investment is eligible to earn. Net present value (NPV) of Project A YearAnnual cash inflow (a) Discounting @ 11 % (b) Present value of cash inflow (a × b) 160, 0000.9054, 000 268, 0000.8155, 080 382, 0000.7359, 860 4109, 0000.6570, 850 5155, 0000.5991, 450 331, 240 Net present value (NPV) = present value of cash inflow – present value cash outflow. Net present value (NPV) = 331, 240 – 185, 000 Net present value (NPV) = 146, 240 Net present value (NPV) of Project B YearAnnual cash inflow (a) Discounting @ 11 % (b) Present value of cash inflow (a × b)
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
165, 0000.9058, 500 269, 0000.8155, 890 377, 0000.7356, 210 4105, 0000.6568, 250 5145, 0000.5985, 550 324, 400 Net present value (NPV) = present value of cash inflow – present value cash outflow. Net present value (NPV) = 324, 400 – 182, 000 Net present value (NPV) = 142, 400 Analysis and discussions As per the calculations that are particularly made in the above paragraphs through calculating the payback period as well as the net present value of the project A and also the project B in particular. The company basically it should opt for project A, instead of opting for project B in particular (Hopkinson., 2017). The major reason for doing so is that the payback period of the project B is 2.6 years which is less than that of the payback period of project A which is 2.7 years. Which would make project B sound good. But when it comes to the net present value which is a more important factor for the purpose of decision- making in particular the net present value in project A is more than that of the net present value in project B in particular. Hence, the better option which the company should particularly opt for is project A as it has a net present value of £146, 240 in particular (Putra., 2019). The net present value supports the company's decisions in a long run, therefore, the major decisions should be made in accordance of that. Hence, according to the calculations that are done above in the report, the company should particularly invest in the synthetic leather bags rather than the clothes bag to enhance the levels of profitability in the long run and in the present situations as well. There are many major factors that help in the process of decision- making in such situations and other key decisions made in the company in particular. The major two categories or factors through which these decisions can be taken are the financial factors as well as the non- financial factors within a company that affect or impact the working of the company in particular (Van der Zwan. and et.al., 2016). Financial factors basically consist of liquidity, firm size, firm
value, fixed asset intensity and leverage as well. The non- financial factors of the company that impact the working of the company are majorly factors or aspects such as, government ownership, independent board of the commissioners and the managerial ownership as well. Through better quality financial factors and strong as well supports the company in particular to make informed as well as better choices in regard to decisions like these and also help the people to weigh the options that are particularly or specifically available in particular. There are also non- financial factors that particularly affect or impact the decision-making procedure in a company. These factors also play a very relevant as well as crucial role. Financial factors such as the evaluations of the aspects such as the cash inflows and the overall cash flows happening in a company in either of the projects that the company has a choice to invest in. hence, analysis and evaluation of all the factors is necessary for the process of decision-making. CONCLUSION This report in particular helps the company to evaluate and analyse the cash flows of both of the projects. In accordance to the data that is provided in particular and then further recommend the most suitable and appropriate decision for the company. As per the information from the calculation of payback period and NPV as well.
REFERENCES Books and Journals Gorshkov, A., Murgul, V. and Oliynyk, O., 2016. Forecasted payback period in the case of energy-efficient activities. InMATEC Web of Conferences(Vol. 53, p. 01045). EDP Sciences. Hopkinson, M., 2017. Net present value and risk modelling for projects. Routledge. Hopkinson, M., 2017. The case for project net present value (NPV) and NPV risk models. In The Evolution of Project Management Practice (pp. 61-68). Routledge. Putra, Y.M., 2019. Analysis of factors affecting the interests of SMEs using accounting applications. Journal of Economics and Business. 2(3). Van der Zwan, P. and et.al., 2016. Factors influencing the entrepreneurial engagement of opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs. Eurasian Business Review. 6(3). pp.273-295.